Komunikasi interpersonal pasangan suami istri yang berpoligami dalam mempertahankan rumah tangga: Studi kasus di Kabupaten Lombok Tengah

Authors

  • Aprilyaningrum Dwi Lestari Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Jawa Timur, 65145, Indonesia;, Indonesia
  • Bayu Karunia Putra Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Jawa Timur, 65145, Indonesia;, Indonesia
  • Suci Lestari Program Studi Hubungan Internasional, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Jawa Timur, 65145, Indonesia;, Indonesia
  • Ananda Desiani Fitri Program Studi Pendidikan Sosiologi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Mataram, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat, 83115, Indonesia;, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/ghde.v1i2.2024.1244

Keywords:

household; husband and wife; interpersonal communication; polygamy.

Abstract

Background: Effective and efficient interpersonal communication can create all forms of superior human relationships and emphasize the quality of openness, empathy, supportive attitudes, positive attitudes, and equality. As is appropriate with the concepts listed in other social sciences, interpersonal communication has many definitions expressed directly by experts regarding the concept of interpersonal communication. As social beings, humans must have the desire to talk, exchange ideas, send and receive messages or information, and share experiences through cooperation to meet each other's needs. Findings: Highlights how tensions in social interactions can be constructive and inhibiting in achieving sustainable collaboration, depending on how well the plans and main objectives of the partnership can be aligned within the organization. Effective leadership pays attention to every problem of achieving targets. Target achievement refers to a priority scale that requires certainty of time. Methods: The method used in this study is descriptive qualitative. The researcher is the key instrument, the data collection technique is carried out by triangulation (combination), and data analysis is inductive/qualitative. Qualitative data is data expressed in the form of sentences or descriptions, the data used in this study, namely qualitative data consisting of primary data and secondary data. Conclusion: The author found that the interpersonal communication process of the informants was always marked by the exchange of information when talking to each other, but this did not happen to informant III. All informants always limited the topics they wanted to discuss with their partners in order to maintain the relationship well, except for the wife of informant IV. In the interpersonal communication process, all informants tried to reveal something they did not like about their partners in order to improve their behavior for a quality relationship, except for the husband of informant V. The obstacles or disturbances that occurred in the interpersonal communication process of all informants consisted of physical, psychological, and conflict obstacles. Although the conflict was only experienced by the wife of informant II. Process obstacles and semantic obstacles were not found in the communication process of the informants. Furthermore, the quality of communication possessed by the informants consisted of openness, empathy, supportive attitude, positive attitude, honesty, trust, and equality. However, the supportive attitude aspect was not possessed by informants III and IV.

References

Abetz, J., & Moore, J. (2018). Welcome to the Mommy Wars Ladies. Making Sense of the Ideology of Combative Mothering in Mommy Blogs, 11(6), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcy008

Adjei, S. B. (2019). Conceptualising personhood, agency, and morality for African psychology. Theor. Psychol, 29, 484–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319857473

Afifah, E., Triyono, T., & Hotifah, Y. (2016). Pengembangan Media Letter Sharing Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Komunikasi Siswa Introvert. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 1(2), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.17977/um001v1i12016p027

Akresh, A., Richard, R., Chen, C., Joyce, J., Moore, M., & Charity, T. (2016). Altruism, cooperation, and efficiency: agricultural production in polygynous households. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change, 64(4), 661–696. https://doi.org/10.1086/686668

Arwan, A. (2018). Efektivitas Komunikasi Interpersonal dalam Mewujudkan Keharmonisan Keluarga di Masyarakat Nelayan Meskom Bengkalis. Jurnal Dakwah Risalah, 29(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.24014/jdr.v29i1.5887

Bhave, A. G., Conway, D., Dessai, S., & Stainforth, D. A. (2016). Barriers and opportunities for robust decision making approaches to support climate change adaptation in the developing world. Climate Risk Management, 14, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2016.09.004

Bobonis, G. J., Gonzalez-Brenes, M., & Castro, R. (2013). Public transfers and domestic violence: the roles of private information and spousal control. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy, 5(1), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.5.1.179.

Bove, R., Vala-Haynes, E., & Valeggia, C. (2014). Polygyny and women’s health in rural Mali. J. Biosoc. Sci., 46(1), 66–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0021932013000059.

Condit, C. M. (2019). Laypeople are strategic essentialists, not genetic essentialists. Hastings Cent. Rep., 49, S27–S37. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1014

de Menil, V., Hoogenhout, M., Kipkemoi, P., Kamuya, D., Eastman, E., & Galvin, A. (2019). The NeuroDev study: phenotypic and genetic characterization of neurodevelopmental disorders in Kenya and South Africa. Neuron, 101, 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.12.016

Faure, M. C., Matshabane, O. P., Marshall, P., Appelbaum, P. S., Stein, D. J., & Engel, M. E. (2019). Does genetics matter for disease-related stigma? The impact of genetic attribution on stigma associated with rheumatic heart disease in the Western Cape, South Africa. Soc. Sci. Med., 243, 112619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112619

Harahap, S. R., & Lestari, Y. I. (2018). Peranan Komitmen dan Komunikasi Interpersonal dalam Meningkatkan Kepuasan Pernikahan pada Suami yang Memiliki Istri Bekerja. Jurnal Psikologi, 14(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.24014/jp.v14i2.5603

Hendrayani, M. (2019). Keterampilan Komunikasi Interpersonal Pekerja Sosial dalam Menangani Pengemis di LPSM Yogyakarta. Jurnal Dakwah Risalah, 30(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.24014/jdr.v30i1.6877

Hirigoyen, G., & Villeger, A. (2017). Women and Power: A Theoretical Approach Using the Example of Copreneurial Businesses. Palgrave Communications, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.100

Indahyani, I. (2013). Memahami Komunikasi Antar Pribadi dalam Pernikahan Beda Agama dalam Upaya Mempertahankan Hubungan yang Harmonis. THE MESSENGER, 5(5), 47–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v5i2.153

Juditha, C., & Darmawan, J. J. (2018). Use of Digital Media and Political Participation Milenial Generation. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Opini Publik, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.33299/jpkop.22.2.1628

Jurczyk, K., Jentsch, B., Sailer, J., & Schier, M. (2019). Female-Breadwinner Families in Germany: New Gender Roles? Journal of Family Issues, 40(18), 1731–1754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19843149

Kapiga, S., Harvey, S., Muhammad, A. K., Stockl, H., Mshana, G., Hashim, R., Hansen, C., Lees, S., & Watts, C. (2017). Prevalence of intimate partner violence and abuse and associated factors among women enrolled into a cluser randomised trial in northwestern Tanzania. BMC Public Health, 17(190), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.01.015.

Kurniawati, D. (2013). Pola Komunikasi Interpersonal dalam Konflik Antara Pasangan Suami Istri Beda Budaya yang Baru Menikah. Jurnal The Messenger, 5(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v5i1.143

Latupono, B. (2020). Kajian Juridis Dampak Poligami Terhadap Kehidupan Keluarga Barzah Latupono. Bacarita Law Journal, 1(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.30598/bacarita.v1i1.2788

Livingston, B. A. (2014). Bargaining Behind the Scenes: Spousal Negotiation, Labor, and Work Family Burnout. Journal of Management, 40(4), 949–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311428355

Mbazima, M. (2016). The lived experiences of Black African mothers following the birth of a child with down syndrome: implications for indigenisation of social work. Soc. Work, 52, 167–187. https://doi.org/10.15270/52-2-499

Millum, J., Campbell, M., Luna, F., Malekzadeh, A., & Karim, Q. A. (2019). Ethical challenges in global health-related stigma research. BMC Med., 17, 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1317-6

Moseson, H., Ouedraogo, R., Diallo, S., & Sakho, A. (2019). Infanticide in Senegal: results from an exploratory mixed-methods study. Sex. Reprod. Health Matt., 27, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1624116

Naibaho, S. L., & Virlia, S. (2017). Rasa Percaya Pada Pasutri Perkawinan Jarak Jauh. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 3(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu12016-54

Parens, E., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2019). On what we have learned and still need to learn about the psychosocial impacts of genetic testing. Hastings Cent. Rep., 49, S2–S9. https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fhast.1011

Ramsay, M., de Vries, J., Soodyall, H., Norris, S., & Sankoh, O. (2014). Ethical issues in genomic research on the African continent: experiences and challenges to ethics review committees. Hum. Genom., 8(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-014-0015-x

Shirol, S. (2018). Sociocultural beliefs and perceptions about cleft lip-palate and their implications in the management, outcome, and rehabilitation. J. Cleft Lip Palate Craniofacial Anomal, 5, 4–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/jclpca.jclpca_41_17

Sugiyono, S. (2017). Medote Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.

Tiffin, N. (2019). Potential risks and solutions for sharing genome summary data from African populations. BMC Med. Genom, 1(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-019-0604-6

Tora, A., Ayode, D., Tadele, G., Farrell, D., Davey, G., & McBride, C. M. (2016). Interpretations of education about gene-environment influences on health in rural Ethiopia: the context of a neglected tropical disease. Int. Health, 8, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1093%2Finthealth%2Fihw016

Tyler, I., & Slater, T. (2018). Rethinking the sociology of stigma. Socio. Rev., 6(6), 721–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118777425

Utamidewi, W., Mulyana, D., & Rizal, E. (2017). Pengalaman Komunikasi Keluarga Pada Mantan Buruh Migran Perempuan. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v5i1.7901

Velotti, P., Balzarotti, S., Tagliabue, S., English, T., Zavattini, G. C., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotional Suppression in Early Marriage: Actor, Partner, and Similarity Effects on Marital Quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(5), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515574466

Widyastuti, D. A. (2018). Potret Interpersonal Communication Skill Mahasiswa Calon Konselor. Counsellia: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 8(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.25273/counsellia.v8i1.2027

Downloads

Published

2024-08-27

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check