Discursive construction of environmental sustainability in the 2024 Indonesian presidential debate: Critical discourse and ecolinguistic analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/crsusf.v3i1.3240Keywords:
critical discourse analysis, ecolinguistics, Indonesian Presidential Debate, political discourse, sustainability governanceAbstract
Background: Environmental sustainability has emerged as a contested discursive arena within Indonesia’s contemporary political communication, particularly during the 2024 presidential debates where competing visions of development, ecological ethics, and national progress converge. This study examines how sustainability is linguistically constructed and ideologically negotiated through an integrated framework combining Critical Discourse Analysis and ecolinguistics. Drawing on a corpus of official debate transcripts, the research analyzes lexical patterns, metaphors, narrative structures, and discursive strategies that shape competing sustainability imaginaries. Methods: Quantitative corpus mapping identifies the prominence of key environmental lexemes, while qualitative interpretation reveals how technocratic and justice-oriented discourses legitimize divergent pathways toward ecological transition. Findings: The findings indicate that sustainability is predominantly framed through technocratic modernization narratives, with hilirisasi functioning as a master signifier that aligns environmental rhetoric with economic rationality. In contrast, agrarian and ethical discourses introduce counter-narratives grounded in stewardship, moral accountability, and socio-ecological justice. These discursive tensions demonstrate how political language actively shapes sustainability governance by influencing policy legitimacy, public imagination, and the perceived boundaries of environmental action. Conclusion: The study concludes that sustainability within the debates operates simultaneously as ideological performance and governance narrative, reflecting broader struggles between neoliberal developmentalism and ecological ethics in the Global South. Novelty/Originality of this article: By integrating CDA and ecolinguistic perspectives, this research advances critical sustainability discourse studies and highlights the importance of linguistically informed approaches to environmentally responsible political communication.
References
Alexander, S., Aronson, J., Whaley, O., & Lamb, D. (2016). The relationship between ecological restoration and the ecosystem services concept. Ecology and Society, 21(1).
Anderson, Z. R., Kusters, K., McCarthy, J., & Obidzinski, K. (2016). Green growth rhetoric versus reality: Insights from Indonesia. Global Environmental Change, 38, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.02.008
Apriliyanti, I. D., Nugraha, D. B., Kristiansen, S., & Overland, I. (2024). To reform or not reform? Competing energy transition perspectives on Indonesia’s monopoly electricity supplier Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN). Energy Research & Social Science, 118, 103797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103797
Atanasova, D. (2022). How Constructive News Outlets Reported the Synergistic Effects of Climate Change and Covid-19 Through Metaphors. Journalism Practice, 16(2–3), 384–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1968311
Ballew, M. T., Thomas-Walters, L., Goldberg, M. H., Verner, M., Lu, J., Marshall, J., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2025). Climate change messages can promote support for climate action globally. Global Environmental Change, 90, 102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102951
Bappenas. (2021). A Green Economy For A Net-Zero Future: How Indonesia can build back better after COVID-19 (I, Issue LLCDI). Kementrian Bappenas.
Bellehumeur, C. R., & Carignan, L. M. (2024). On proposing relational environmental metaphors to stimulate engagement and foster well-being in the midst of climate change. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15(May), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1377205
BNI. (2025). BNI Supports the Construction and Operation of PT Geo Dipa Energi (Persero)'s 500 MW Geothermal Energy Plant. Bank Negara Indonesia. https://www.bni.co.id/id-id/beranda/kabar-bni/berita/articleid/25632
Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Bloomsbury Publishing.
CCPI. (n.d.). Indonesia. Climate Change Performance Index. https://ccpi.org/country/idn/
Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. OUP Oxford.
Ellison, K. (2017). Book review: Arran Stibbe, Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. Discourse Studies, 19(1), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616683588a
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.) (Routledge (ed.)). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Ferreira, J. J., Lopes, J. M., Gomes, S., & Dias, C. (2023). Diverging or converging to a green world? Impact of green growth measures on countries’ economic performance. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02991-x
Hussain, Z., Mehmood, B., Khan, M. K., & Tsimisaraka, R. S. M. (2022). Green Growth, Green Technology, and Environmental Health: Evidence From High-GDP Countries. Frontiers in Public Health, 9(January), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.816697
Jackson, J. (2024). Trading-off or trading-in? A critical political economy perspective of green growth’s policy framing. Globalizations, 21(7), 1309–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2348259
Johnstone, C., & Stickles, E. (2024). Navigating the climate change minefield: the influence of metaphor on climate doomism. Frontiers in Communication, 9(May), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1380092
Kevin van Langen, S., Vassillo, C., Ghisellini, P., Restaino, D., Passaro, R., & Ulgiati, S. (2021). Promoting circular economy transition: A study about perceptions and awareness by different stakeholders groups. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128166
Kurniawan, T. A., Avtar, R., Singh, D., Xue, W., Dzarfan Othman, M. H., Hwang, G. H., Iswanto, I., Albadarin, A. B., & Kern, A. O. (2021). Reforming MSWM in Sukunan (Yogjakarta, Indonesia): A case-study of applying a zero-waste approach based on circular economy paradigm. Journal of Cleaner Production, 284, 124775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124775
Kurniawati, W., Ekoyanantiasih, R., Yulianti, S., Hardaniawati, M., Sasangka, S. W., & Firdaus, W. (2022). Kekuasaan Semantik dalam Analisis Wacana Kritis Debat Capres-Cawapres. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 11(1), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v11i1.4966
Laclau, E., & Mouffe C. (2001). Hegemony and Social Strategy. In Hegemony and Socialist Strategy.
Liu, F. H. M., Ganesan, V., & Smith, T. E. L. (2020). Contrasting communications of sustainability science in the media coverage of palm oil agriculture on tropical peatlands in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. Environmental Science & Policy, 114, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.004
Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). Review of How to do critical discourse analysis. In Sage (p. 242).
Montgomery, A. Wren, Lyon, Thomas P, & Barg, Julian. (2023). No End in Sight? A Greenwash Review and Research Agenda. Organization & Environment, 37(2), 221–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266231168905
Muazam, A. R. (2025). Hari Tani 2025: Kuasa Tanah Timpang, Konflik Agrarian Terus Terjadi. Mongabay. https://mongabay.co.id/2025/09/24/hari-tani-2025-kuasa-tanah-timpang-konflik-agrarian-terus-terjadi/
Nemes, N., Scanlan, S. J., Smith, P., Smith, T., Aronczyk, M., Hill, S., Lewis, S. L., Montgomery, A. W., Tubiello, F. N., & Stabinsky, D. (2022). An Integrated Framework to Assess Greenwashing. In Sustainability (Vol. 14, Issue 8, p. 4431). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084431
Nuh, S. K., & Prawira, I. (2023). An ecolinguistic analysis of climate change news in Indonesia: The case of Mongabay. E3S Web of Conferences, 426. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342602119
Nurkaidah, Anas, A., & Baharuddin, T. (2024). Implementation of environmental policies on the development of a new capital city in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2297764
Pratama, R., Hannany, Z., & Rosdiana, N. (2025). INCO focuses on downstreaming, nickel production to rise 12% in the first half of 2025. IDN Financials. https://www.idnfinancials.com/id/news/57196/inco-fokus-hilirisasi-produksi-nikel-semester-i-2025-naik-12
Purwaramdhona, A. B. (2025). Penggunaan analisis korpus melalui aplikasi AntConc dalam penelitian karya sastra. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 8(2), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v8i2.1198
Radtke, J., & Renn, O. (2024). Participation in Energy Transitions: A Comparison of Policy Styles. Energy Research & Social Science, 118, 103743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103743
Rahro, H. R., Jebelli, P., & Azimfard, F. (2024). Critical discourse analysis of presidential candidates TV debates between Ebrahim Raisi and Abdolnaser Hemmati in Iran’s 2021 presidential election. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101040
Resosudarmo, B. P., Rezki, J. F., & Effendi, Y. (2023). Prospects of Energy Transition in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 59(2), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2023.2238336
Shaw, C., & Nerlich, B. (2015). Metaphor as a mechanism of global climate change governance: A study of international policies, 1992–2012. Ecological Economics, 109, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.001
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. Taylor & Francis.
Sumarno, T. B., Sihotang, P., & Prawiraatmadja, W. (2022). Exploring Indonesia’s energy policy failures through the JUST framework. Energy Policy, 164(June 2021), 112914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112914
van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press.
van Hulst, M., Metze, T., Dewulf, A., de Vries, J., van Bommel, S., & van Ostaijen, M. (2025). Discourse, framing and narrative: three ways of doing critical, interpretive policy analysis. Critical Policy Studies, 19(1), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2024.2326936
Wodak, R. (2021). The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-right Discourse. Sage.
Zhou, W. (2021). Book review: Arran Stibbe, Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. Discourse Studies, 23(3), 420–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445621998094c
Zizek, S., Abercrombie, N., Adorno, T., Althusser, L., & Barrett, M. (2012). Mapping Ideology. Verso Books.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Saiyidinal Firdaus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
