Beyond human interests: An ecocentric critique of Indonesia’s environmental legal framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/crsusf.v3i1.3158Keywords:
anthropocentrism, ecocentrism, ecological justice, environmental law, IndonesiaAbstract
Background: Anthropogenic climate change has intensified ecological degradation globally, including in Indonesia. While frameworks such as the Paris Agreement promote sustainability, their effectiveness depends on how national legal systems translate ecological commitments into practice. As a country situated within the Global South, Indonesia’s environmental legislation—covering environmental protection, forestry, mining, energy, and coastal management—continues to exhibit an anthropocentric orientation that subordinates ecological integrity to economic and developmental priorities. Previous studies have focused mainly on governance and enforcement, leaving the philosophical foundations of environmental law underexplored. This study addresses that gap by examining how anthropocentrism shapes Indonesia’s environmental legal framework and proposing an ecocentric alternative as a more coherent foundation for ecological justice. Methods: Using a qualitative doctrinal approach adapted from ecolinguistic methodology, the analysis operationalizes four dimensions—core textual formula, dominant linguistic pattern, analytical category, and structural orientation—to identify how statutory language frames the human–nature relationship. Findings: The findings show that Indonesia’s environmental laws embody a weak anthropocentric orientation, framing nature primarily as a state-controlled resource for human welfare. Economic logic linguistically shapes concepts like sustainability and ecosystem protection, reinforcing human-centered values. Conclusion: To overcome this, the study introduces an ecocentric paradigm grounded in the concept of the ecological community, which affirms the intrinsic value of all living and non-living entities and repositions humans as participants within the web of life rather than its rulers. Novelty/Originality of this article: By integrating ecocentric principles into Indonesia’s legal philosophy and institutional framework, environmental law may be reframed from a tool of resource management into a moral and juridical foundation for sustaining the community of life.
References
Aggestam Pontoppidan, C., Bisogno, M., Caruana, J., & Dabbicco, G. (2024). Safeguarding our roots: Natural resources accounting and reporting in the public sector. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(7), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2023-2106
Aidonojie, P. A., Aidonojie, E. C., Antai, G. O., Ekpenisi, C., & Ayuba, D. (2025). Constitutional and legislative frameworks for green and sustainable environmental governance in Uganda. International Journal of Constitutional and Administrative Law, 1(1), 1–20. https://ijcal.profesionallegal.com/index.php/ijcal/article/view/1
Alves, F., Costa, P. M., Novelli, L., & Vidal, D. G. (2023). The rights of nature and the human right to nature: An overview of the European legal system and challenges for the ecological transition. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1175143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1175143
Azam, U., Miraj, R., Zerin, S. A., & Alabi, F. F. K. (2025). The Rights of Nature Movement: Legal, Cultural, and Policy Challenges in Implementing Eco-Centric Laws. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y, 5, 87. https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp050104
Beau, R. (2023). The Ecological Community: The Blind Spot of Environmental Virtue Ethics. Philosophies, 8(6), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies8060112
Begon, M., & Townsend, C. R. (2020). Ecology: From individuals to ecosystems. John Wiley & Sons.
Berros, M. V. (2021). Challenges for the Implementation of the Rights of Nature: Ecuador and Bolivia as the First Instances of an Expanding Movement. Latin American Perspectives, 48(3), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211004898
Bieluk, J. (2020). River as a legal person. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 29(2), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.2.11-23
Buitendijk, T., Cahillane, A., Brannigan, J., & Crowe, T. P. (2024). Valuing plurality: Environmental humanities approaches to ecosystem services and Nature’s Contributions to People. Environmental Science & Policy, 162, 103907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103907
Chen, Y., Teo, F. Y., Wong, S. Y., Chan, A., Weng, C., & Falconer, R. A. (2024). Monsoonal Extreme Rainfall in Southeast Asia: A Review. Water, 17(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17010005
Cinner, J. E., & Barnes, M. L. (2019). Social dimensions of resilience in social-ecological systems. One Earth, 1(1), 51–56. https://www.cell.com/one-earth/fulltext/S2590-3322(19)30007-7
Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador, Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador § Ch. 1 (Art. 10); Ch. 7 (Arts. 71–74) (2008). https://www.garn.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Rights-for-Nature-Articles-in-Ecuadors-Constitution.pdf
Fensterseifer, T., & Leite, J. R. M. (2024). Towards ecological law? Environmental law on the threshold of a new ecocentric legal paradigm in the anthropocene: Verso un diritto ecologico? Il diritto ambientale alla soglia di un nuovo paradigma giuridico ecocentrico nell’Antropocene. DPCE Online, 64(2). https://doi.org/10.57660/dpceonline.2024.2173
Frantz, P., Rego, F., & Barbas, S. (2025). Ecocentrism vs. Anthropocentrism: To the Core of the Dilemma to Overcome It. The Linacre Quarterly, 00243639251339844. https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639251339844
Gabric, A. J. (2023). The Climate Change Crisis: A Review of Its Causes and Possible Responses. Atmosphere, 14(7), 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071081
Gonzalez, C. G. (2021). Racial capitalism, climate justice, and climate displacement. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Symposium on Climate Justice in the Anthropocene, 11(1), 108–147. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3626490
Guayasamin, J. M., Vandegrift, R., Policha, T., Encalada, A. C., Greene, N., Ríos-Touma, B., ... & Roy, B. A. (2021). Biodiversity conservation: local and global consequences of the application of “rights of nature” by Ecuador. Neotropical Biodiversity, 7(1), 541-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2021.2006550
Guggisberg, S. (2024). Rights of nature and non-use of nature for environmental protection in Antarctica. The Polar Journal, 14(2), 446–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2024.2414645
Himes, A., Muraca, B., Anderson, C. B., Athayde, S., Beery, T., Cantú-Fernández, M., González-Jiménez, D., Gould, R. K., Hejnowicz, A. P., & Kenter, J. (2024). Why nature matters: A systematic review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values. BioScience, 74(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biad109
Houle, J. R. (2024). Ecocentric Environmental Justice: Why We Should Go There and How We Can Get There. Pace Environmental Law Review, 42(3), 1. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr/vol42/iss3/1/
IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report; p. 2391). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
Jabbar, A. R. A. A., & Angraeni, U. (2024, April). Review of Environmental Political Theory on Environmental Policy in Indonesia. In World Conference on Governance and Social Sciences (WCGSS 2023) (pp. 20-27). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-236-1_4
Kanwal, P. (2023). Ecocentric Governance: Recognising the Rights of Nature. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 69(2), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/00195561221141457
Kanyama, M. C. (2025). Ecological restoration in rights-of-nature laws and restoration as a substantive right of nature: Challenges and opportunities. Restoration Ecology, e70100. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70100
Kopnina, H., Washington, H., Taylor, B., & Piccolo, J. (2021). Anthropocentrism: More than just a misunderstood problem. The International Journal of Ecopsychology (IJE), 3(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.55671/2767-1380.1043
Kramm, M. (2020). When a River Becomes a Person. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 21(4), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2020.1801610
Kriswandaru, A. S., & Lubis, A. F. (2024). Implementation of environmental law and environmental preservation efforts in Indonesia. ANAYASA: Journal of Legal Studies, 1(2), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.61397/ays.v1i2.93
Laastad, S. G. (2020). Nature as a Subject of Rights? National Discourses on Ecuador’s Constitutional Rights of Nature. Forum for Development Studies, 47(3), 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2019.1654544
Le Duc, A. (2020). The Multiple Contexts of the Environmental Crisis. Asian Research Center for Religion and Social Communication; Saengtham College. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3812050
Maruf, A. (2021). Legal aspects of environment in Indonesia: An efforts to prevent environmental damage and pollution. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i1.4
Mbeva, K., & Makomere, R. (2025). “Embedded developmentalism”: Normative and institutional responses to the global catastrophic risk of underdevelopment. Development in Practice, 35(6), 972–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2025.2505737
Moyano-Fernández, C. (2023). Rethinking the environmental virtue of ecological justice from the interdependencies of non-human capabilities and synergetic flourishing. Philosophies, 8(6), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies8060103
Natarajan, U. (2021). Environmental justice in the Global South. The Cambridge handbook of environmental justice and sustainable development, 39. Cambridge University Press.
Nurkaidah., Anas, A., & Baharuddin, T. (2024). Implementation of environmental policies on the development of a new capital city in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2297764. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2297764
O’Donnell, E. (2020). Rivers as living beings: Rights in law, but no rights to water? Griffith Law Review, 29(4), 643–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2020.1881304
Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Anderson, C. B., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Christie, M., González-Jiménez, D., Martin, A., Raymond, C. M., Termansen, M., & Vatn, A. (2023). Diverse values of nature for sustainability. Nature, 620(7975), 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9
Petel, M. (2025, June 11). Beyond the critique of anthropocentrism: Rethinking the rights of nature. Open Global Rights. https://www.openglobalrights.org/beyond-the-critique-of-anthropocentrism-rethinking-the-rights-of-nature/
Proedrou, F., & Pournara, M. (2025). Exploring representations of climate change as ecocide: Implications for climate policy. Climate Policy, 25(2), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2024.2368859
Putro, W. D., & Bedner, A. W. (2023). Ecological Sustainability from a Legal Philosophy Perspective. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(2), 595–632. https://doi.org/doi:10.15294/jils.v8i2.71127
Raiser, K., Kornek, U., Flachsland, C., & Lamb, W. F. (2020). Is the Paris Agreement effective? A systematic map of the evidence. Environmental Research Letters, 15(8), 083006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab865c
Saha, S. (2025). A call for transitioning to an ecocentric approach to further the sustainability paradigm focusing on nature–human relationship. Jindal Global Law Review, 16(1), 335–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-025-00270-6
Sánchez, N. A. A., & Ruiz, L. M. M. (2025). The rights of nature in the constitution of Ecuador: A pillar of good living. Centro Sur, 9(2), 100–128. https://doi.org/10.37955/cs.v9i2.384
Senko, P. (2021). Foundations of ecocentric Law. Russian Law Journal, 9(4), 72–98. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2021-9-4-72-98
Siraj, A., & Budhiartie, A. (2025). Natural Resource Governance in Indonesia and Pakistan: A Comparative Review. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v7i2.25037
Soytas, U., & Sari, R. (2025). Societal well-being and resource use. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05162-7
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315718071/ecolinguistics-arran-stibbe
Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017, Public Act 2017 No 7 (2017). https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2017/0007/latest/whole.html
Valladares, C., & Boelens, R. (2017). Extractivism and the rights of nature: Governmentality, ‘convenient communities’ and epistemic pacts in Ecuador. Environmental Politics, 26(6), 1015–1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1338384
Washington, H., Piccolo, J. J., Kopnina, H., & Simpson, F. O. (2024). Ecological and social justice should proceed hand-in-hand in conservation. Biological Conservation, 290, 110456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110456
Wassie, S. B. (2020). Natural resource degradation tendencies in Ethiopia: A review. Environmental Systems Research, 9(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-020-00194-1
Wegener, L. (2020). Can the Paris agreement help climate change litigation and vice versa? Transnational Environmental Law, 9(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102519000396
Wijaya, T., & Sinclair, L. (2025). An EV-fix for Indonesia: The green development-resource nationalist nexus. Environmental Politics, 34(2), 252–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2024.2332129
World Meteorological Organization. (2025). State of the Climate in Asia 2024 (WMO-No. 1373). https://wmo.int/publication-series/state-of-climate-asia-2024
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ratri Ayu Bethari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
