From convenience to consciousness: Environmental ethics in the consumptive lifestyles of urban University students

Authors

  • Achmad Adam Azzuri Department of Environmental Science, Graduate School of Sustainable Development, Universitas Indonesia, Central Jakarta, Special Capital Region of Jakarta 10430, Indonesia., Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/crsusf.v2i2.2366

Keywords:

anthropocentrism, convenience, consciousness, ecocentrism

Abstract

Background: Daily lifestyles of urban university students are increasingly influenced by a consumption culture centered on convenience, often at the expense of environmental sustainability.This study aims to explore the environmental ethics paradigms of anthropocentrism, biocentrism, and ecocentrism underlying the consumptive behaviors of university students in Indonesia. Previous research has mostly emphasized technical aspects of waste management or quantitatively measured environmental attitudes, but rarely has it examined the moral values influencing individual consumption choices. The central hypothesis of this study is that students' consumptive behaviors are strongly shaped by normative value systems, rather than merely by environmental knowledge. Methods: This research adopts a qualitative case study approach, involving seven undergraduate students from Universitas Indonesia, Depok, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through four weeks of participant observation at major consumption points on campus and semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed thematically using Braun & Clarke’s method, based on five consumption parameters: food packaging, drinking habits, online shopping behavior, waste management, and ethical awareness. Findings: Reveal that the majority of students still operate within a utilitarian-anthropocentric mindset, prioritizing practicality, price, and prevailing social norms. Only two participants consistently exhibited ecocentric behaviors, such as bringing reusable food containers and avoiding impulsive purchases. A clear knowledge-action gap was identified, reinforced by social norms, emotional dissonance, and the lack of structural support such as incentives or institutional role models. Conclusion: This study concludes that transitioning from a convenience-based to a conscious lifestyle requires value-based interventions through ethical education, sustainability-oriented incentives, and moral leadership within the campus environment. Novelty/Originality of this article: The main contribution of this study lies in its philosophical approach to understanding student consumption as a reflection of environmental ethical reasoning.

References

Alisha, & Kumar, S. (2024). Identification of the Impact of Social Norms on Environmental Decision Making. In Nudging Green: Behavioral Economics and Environmental Sustainability (pp. 105-122). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65972-0_6

Begum, A., Jingwei, L., Marwat, I. U. K., Khan, S., Han, H., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2021). Evaluating the impact of environmental education on ecologically friendly behavior of university students in Pakistan: The roles of environmental responsibility and Islamic values. Sustainability, 13(18), 10188. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810188

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, M. G., & Smith, R. A. (2024). Campus ecological networks: Understanding patterns of relationships in learning, identity, and equity in college. Journal of College Student Development, 65(2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2024.a923525

Cafaro, P. J., & Primack, R. B. (2024). Environmental Ethics. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, 1(7), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822562-2.00229-2

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2155979

Dijoo, Z. K., & Khurshid, R. (2022). Environmental degradation as a multifaceted consequence of human development. In Environmental Biotechnology (pp. 39-56). Apple Academic Press.

Guan, Y., Wei, F., Liu, S., Tan, Q., & Li, J. (2023). Consumer perceptions and behaviors toward take-out food plastic packaging reduction: A case study of college students in China. Circular Economy, 2(3), 100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2023.100052

Gursoy, D., Başer, G., & Chi, C. G. (2025). Corporate digital responsibility: navigating ethical, societal, and environmental challenges in the digital age and exploring future research directions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 34(3), 305-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2025.2465634

Handayani, S., Forijati, F., & Subagyo, S. (2024). Promoting Eco-Friendly Consumption Behavior in Vocational High School Students: A Comprehensive Case Study of Educational Approaches. Health Dynamics, 1(2), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.33846/hd10202

Hoelscher, V., & Chatzidakis, A. (2021). Ethical consumption communities across physical and digital spaces: An exploration of their complementary and synergistic affordances. Journal of Business Ethics, 172(2), 291-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04477-6

Igini, M. (2024). The Truth About Online Shopping and Its Environmental Impact. https://earth.org/online-shopping-and-its-environmental-impact/

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Mamada, R. (2024). Societal norms and the shadow of the mind: Averting the tragedy of the commons through a new understanding of cooperation. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101009

Mongabay, M. (2020). Kampus sumber sampah plastik: Syaharani berbagi cara mengatasinya. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2020/07/21/kampus-sumber-sampah-plastik-syaharani-berbagi-cara-mengatasinya/

Mooney, M. E., Middlecamp, C., Martin, J., & Ackerman, S. A. (2022). The Demise of the Knowledge–Action Gap in Climate Change Education. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(10), 2265–2272. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0256.1

Morais, A. C., & Ishida, A. (2024). Ethical consumption and food recovery hierarchy behaviors: a clustering analysis in Japan. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 744–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00896-3

Ozanne, L. K., Ballantine, P. W., & McMaster, A. (2022). Understanding Food Waste Produced by University Students: A Social Practice Approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710653

Sandhu, S., Lodhia, S., Potts, A., & Crocker, R. (2021). Environment friendly takeaway coffee cup use: Individual and institutional enablers and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125271

Schild, R., Ibrahim, N., & Seow, T. (2022). The demise of the knowledge–action gap in climate change education. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(10), E2434–E2442. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0256.1

Schneider, T., & Eli, K. (2023). The digital labor of ethical food consumption: a new research agenda for studying everyday food digitalization. Agriculture and Human Values, 40(2), 489-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10390-7

SIPSN. (2024). Data Timbulan Sampah Nasional 2024. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan: Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Sampah Nasional (SIPSN). https://sipsn.menlhk.go.id/sipsn/public/data/timbulan

UI GreenMetric. (2023). About UI GreenMetric. https://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/about

Wang, D., Chen, W., Zheng, X., & Li, Y. (2022). Mechanism of Undergraduate Students’ Waste Separation Behavior in the Environmentally Friendly Higher Education Mega Center of Guangzhou. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2022(2). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4475245

Weiss, M., Barth, M., & von Wehrden, H. (2021). The patterns of curriculum change processes that embed sustainability in higher education institutions. Sustainability Science, 16(5), 1579-1593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00984-1

Yang, S., & Yan, Q. (2023). Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management Study on Consumption Behavior of Campus Student in E-commerce Models under Big Data. 12(1), 204. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v12i1.14098

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2196587

Zhang, M., Zhang, R., Li, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Knowing green, buying green: University students green knowledge and green purchase behavior. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03243-7

Downloads

Published

2025-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check