Hegemony and counter-hegemony in the narrative of nickel downstreaming in Indonesia: A critical theory study

Authors

  • Fadhila Nurul Laili Romadhonia Department of Sociology and Anthropology Education, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Gunungpati, Semarang, Central Java 50229, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/spms.v2i2.2025.2769

Keywords:

counter-hegemony, critical theory, hegemony, nickel downstreaming

Abstract

Background: Nickel downstreaming policy represents Indonesia’s national development ambition in response to the global energy transition discourse. The state deploys political strategies through legal regulations and ideological strategies through dominant narratives to sustain the nickel downstreaming project. The emergence of counter-narratives articulated by subordinate groups indicates an ongoing struggle over the meaning of development within the nickel downstreaming agenda. Methods: This study employs a qualitative descriptive approach, with data collected through documentation and literature review. Data were analyzed using data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. Finding: The findings reveal that within a hegemonic system, the state functions as the organizer of consent, acting as an extension of capitalist interests to disseminate capitalist logic through mass media. Economic and development narratives are predominantly employed by the state to construct public consent. Conversely, subordinate groups, organized by organic intellectuals, resist and challenge the state’s dominant narratives by advancing social and ecological narratives. These counter-narratives seek to generate new forms of consent by offering alternative interpretations of nickel downstreaming as a destructive and exploitative practice. Conclusion: Mass media, as a communication institution, has become a key arena for the contestation between hegemony and counter-hegemony through narrative struggles between ruling groups and subordinate groups. This contestation reflects a crisis of state hegemony, wherein the ideological legitimacy of development is challenged by counter-narratives that demand social and ecological justice. Novelty/Originality of this article: The originality of this article lies in its application of Antonio Gramsci’s theory of hegemony to analyze narrative struggles surrounding nickel downstreaming in Indonesian mass media.

References

Altheide, David. L. (2015). Media Hegemony : A failure of perspective. American Association for Public Opinion Research, 48(2), 476–490. https://doi.org/10.1086/268844

Althusser, L. (2017). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses: Notes towards an investigation. In New Critical Writings in Political Sociology: Volume Two: Conventional and Contentious Politics (pp. 299–340). https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003572923-18/ideology-ideological-state-apparatuses-althusser

Baeg, H. I. (1991). Hegemony and counter-hegemony in gramsci. Asian Perspective, 15(1), 123–156. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.1991.a921265

Belolon, H. K. (2024). From collective identity to counter-hegemony. PCD Journal, 11(2), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.v11i2.11504

Carpentier, N., & Cammaerts, B. (2006). Hegemony, democracy, agonism and journalism. Journalism Studies, 7(6), 964–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600980728

Carroll, W. K. (2009). Hegemony, counter-hegemony, anti-hegemony. Socialist Studies/Études Socialistes, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.18740/S44G7K

Carroll, W. K., & Ratner, R. S. (2010). Social movements and counter-hegemony: Lessons from the Field. 4(1), 7–22. https://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/newproposals/article/view/1876

Chagnon, C. W., Durante, F., Gills, B. K., Hagolani-Albov, S. E., Hokkanen, S., Kangasluoma, S. M. J., Konttinen, H., Kröger, M., LaFleur, W., Ollinaho, O., & Vuola, M. P. S. (2022). From extractivism to global extractivism: the evolution of an organizing concept. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 49(4), 760–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2069015

Chung, J. (2025). The Mineral Industry of Indonesia in 2023. https://pubs.usgs.gov/myb/vol3/2023/myb3-2023-indonesia.pdf

Cornwall, A. (2010). Deconstructing development discourse: Buzzwords and fuzzwords. deconstructing development discourse, Development in Practice, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469302

Cox, R. H., & Schilthuis, A. (2012). Hegemony and counterhegemony. In the wiley‐blackwell encyclopedia of globalization. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog265

Cukier, W., Bauer, R., & Middleton, C. (2004). Applying Habermas’ Validity Claims as a Standard for Critical Discourse Analysis. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_14

Das, M. (1981). Social Movements, Social Change, and Mass Communication. International Journals, 11(1), 127–143. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41420783

Durniev, O., & Nekhaienko, O. (2023). Internet as an ideological state apparatus. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 59(4), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.23856/5920

Dwinh, & Sari, A. P. (2024). Dampak nyata kebijakan hilirisasi di bawah kepemimpinan jokowi. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/10/21/12190211/dampak-nyata-kebijakan-hilirisasi-di-bawah-kepemimpinan-jokowi?page=all

Egan, D. (2016). Gramsci’s war of position as siege warfare: Some lessons from history. Critique, 44(4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2016.1236486

Fajriadi, A. I. (2025). Kiara: Tambang nikel ancam nelayan dan lingkungan pesisir. https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/kiara-tambang-nikel-ancam-nelayan-dan-lingkungan-pesisir-1755542

Femia, J. (1975). Hegemony and consciousness in the thought of antonio gramsci. Political Studies, 23(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1975.tb00044.x

Goswami, M. P. (2018). Social media and hashtag activism. In Liberty Dignity and Change in Journalism. Kanishka Publisher.

Greenpeace Indonesia. (2025). Kritik industrialisasi nikel, aktivis greenpeace gelar aksi di konferensi nikel internasional jakarta. https://www.greenpeace.org/indonesia/siaran-pers/63070/aktivis-greenpeace-aksi-di-konferensi-nikel-internasional/

Greenpeace Indonesia. (2025). Lindungi Raja Ampat secara penuh dan permanen. https://www.greenpeace.org/indonesia/siaran-pers/63103/lindungi-raja-ampat-secara-penuh-dan-permanen/

Haddad, H., Novianty, H., & Adolf, H. (2022). Larangan ekspor bijih nikel indonesia diantara stabilitas perdagangan internasional. Mimbar Hukum, 34(2), 559–588. https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v34i2.2686

Happer, C., & Philo, G. (2013). The role of the media in the construction of public belief and social change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v1i1.96

Herawan, J., & Susilo, Y. S. (2024). Impact of nickel downstreaming in North Maluku: Input-output analysis. journal of business and information systems, 6(2), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.31316/jbis.v6i2.261

Holdo, M. (2019). Cooptation and non-cooptation: elite strategies in response to social protest. Social Movement Studies, 18(4), 444–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1577133

Hutagalung, D. (2004). Hegemoni, kekuasan, dan, ideologi. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosial, Politik Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 74(12), 1–17.

Riady, I. K. (2024). Dampak kebijakan hilirisasi nikel terhadap peningkatan ekspor komoditas besi dan baja indonesia. RELASI: JURNAL EKONOMI, 20(1), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.31967/relasi.v20i1.973

Indainanto, Y. I., Fatharani, R. B., & Halim, R. (2024). Digital activism of wahana lingkungn hidup indonesia (walhi) hashtag in voicing environmental issues on social media. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v3i12.12500

Intan, G. (2024). Hilirisasi nikel, siapa yang untung dan siapa yang ‘buntung’?. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/hilirisasi-nikel-siapa-yang-untung-dan-siapa-yang-buntung-/7445312.html https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/kiara-hilirisasi-nikel-abaikan-ekologi-dan-hak-masyarakat-pesisir-1674027

JATAM. (2024). Hilirisasi Nikel: Setan yang Merongrong Kehidupan Warga. https://jatam.org/id/lengkap/Setan-Hilirisasi-Nikel

JATAM. (2025). Vonis 11 Warga Maba Sangaji: Polisi dan Korporasi Bersekongkol, Negara Melegitimasi Kriminalisasi Pembela Lingkungan. https://jatam.org/id/lengkap/Vonis-11-Warga-Maba-Sangaji-Kriminalisasi-Pembela-Lingkungan

Jordy. (2025). Untangling Nickel Downstreaming: A Political Economy Analysis of Indonesia’s Morowali Industrial Park Article. International Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 2(1), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.69812/ijsps.v2i2.136

Kementerian ESDM. (2019). Bijih Nikel Tidak Boleh Diekspor Lagi per Januari 2020. https://www.esdm.go.id/id/media-center/arsip-berita/bijih-nikel-tidak-boleh-diekspor-lagi-per-januari-2020

Kementerian ESDM. (2020). Nickel Downstreaming an Obligation. https://www.esdm.go.id/en/media-center/news-archives/hilirisasi-nikel-demi-nilai-tambah-bangsa-indonesia

Kementerian ESDM. (2020). Hilirisasi Nikel Ciptakan Nilai Tambah dan Daya Tahan Ekonomi. https://www.esdm.go.id/assets/booklet/tambang-2020/Booklet-Nikel-FA.pdf

Kementerian ESDM. (2025). Pemerintah Cabut Empat Izin Perusahaan Tambang di Raja Ampat. https://www.esdm.go.id/id/media-center/arsip-berita/pemerintah-cabut-empat-izin-perusahaan-tambang-di-raja-ampat

Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. (2025). Pemerintah Resmi Cabut IUP Empat Perusahaan Tambang di Raja Ampat. https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/pemerintah_resmi_cabut_iup_empat_perusahaan_tambang_di_raja_ampat

Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Verso.

Lahadalia, B., Wijaya, C., Dartanto, T. & Subroto, A. (2024). Into Sustainable and Equitable Nickel Downstreaming in Indonesia: What Policy Reforms are Needed? Migration Letters, 21(3), 620–631. https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/6759

Landy, M. (2008). Gramsci, Passive Revolution, and Media. Boundary 2, 35(3), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-2008-013

Lawrence, P. (2019). Corporate Power, the State, and the Post-Capitalist Future. In Land, the State and the Unfinished Decolonisation Project in Africa. Langaa RPCIG. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvmd84q7.6

Liguori, G. (2021). Common Sense / Senso comune: Gramsci Dictionary. International Gramsci Journal, 4(2), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.14276/igj.v4i2.4111

Lipsitz, G. (1988). The Struggle for Hegemony. The Journal of American History, 75(1), 146. https://doi.org/10.2307/1889660

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). Manifesto of the Communist Party.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Editions 3). Universitas Indonesia Press (UI-PRESS).

MPR.go.id. (2023). Pidato Presiden Republik Indonesia. https://mpr.go.id/dokumen/unduh/file/1808954264.pdf?utm

Randrikasari, O., Suwardi, O., P., & Islamiyah, N. (2025). Strengthening Indonesia’s Nickel Downstream Industry through Green Energy-Based Smelter Technology. Jurnal Pengelolaan Lingkungan Pertambangan, 2(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.70191/jplp.v2i1.60898

Pearce, C., & Komaromy, C. (2022). Recovering the body in grief: Physical absence and embodied presence. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 26(4), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459320931914

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2024). Presiden Jokowi: Hilirisasi Nikel dan Sumber Daya Alam Jadi Kunci Peningkatan Ekonomi Nasional. https://www.presidenri.go.id/siaran-pers/presiden-jokowi-hilirisasi-nikel-dan-sumber-daya-alam-jadi-kunci-peningkatan-ekonomi-nasional/

Project Multatuli. (2023). Serial #HilirisasiOligarki. https://projectmultatuli.org/serial/hilirisasioligarki/

Purcell, M. (2009). Hegemony and Difference in Political Movements: Articulating Networks of Equivalence. New Political Science, 31(3), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393140903105959

Putra, A. T., & Samputra, P. L. (2023). Analysis of nickel export restriction and downstream policy in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 3(3), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i3.749

Rynaldi, A., Sinaga, E. H., & Sitorus, J. R. (2024). Kajian Kriminologi Hijau Terhadap Studi Kasus Hilirisasi Tambang Nikel. Jurnal Lingkungan Kebumian Indonesia, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.47134/kebumian.v1i3.2572

Ritzer, G. (2012). Teori Sosiologi: Dari Klasik sampai Perkembangan Terakhir Postmodern. Pustaka Belajar.

Salomon, M., Simanjutak, F., Shafaie, A., & Heller, P. (2025). Indonesia’s Energy Transition Ambitions: Nickel Downstreaming and Beyond . https://resourcegovernance.org/articles/indonesia-energy-transition-ambitions-nickel-dow

Sardar, N. (2024). Understanding Hegemony: A Critical Analysis through the Lens of Antonio Gramsci. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.15796

Savitri, P. I., & Firdaus, A. (2025). Menteri ESDM Dorong Hilirisasi Hijau agar Diterima Pasar Internasional. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4889289/menteri-esdm-dorong-hilirisasi-hijau-agar-diterima-pasar-internasional?utm

Sekretaris Kabinet Republik Indonesia. (2025, June 10). Empat izin tambang dicabut, pemerintah tegaskan komiten jaga kawasan konservasi Raja Ampat. https://setkab.go.id/empat-izin-tambang-dicabut-pemerintah-tegaskan-komitmen-jaga-kawasan-konservasi-raja-ampat/

Setiawan, R., & Maudy Noor Fadlhia. (2025). Green But Extractive: Diplomasi Hilirisasi Nikel Indonesia Dan Politik Eksklusi Sosial Di Weda Bay. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.51622/jispol.v5i1.2721

Shiddiq. (2025). ESDM: Tingkatkan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dengan Genjot Hilirisasi. https://nikel.co.id/2025/02/20/esdm-tingkatkan-pertumbuhan-ekonomi-dengan-genjot-hilirisasi/

Siswati, E. (2018). Anatomi teori hegemoni antonio gramsci. Translitera: Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Dan Studi Media, 5(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.35457/translitera.v5i1.355

Soe’oed, D. V. (2024). Analisis Kebijakan Ekstraktivisme Sumber Daya Alam: Studi Kasus Freeport dan Ketimpangan Ekonomi Papua. Jurnal Ilmiah Pemerintahan, 12(2), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.55678/prj.v12i3.1712

Sousa, J. W. (2022). Liberating Community-based Research: Rescuing Gramsci’s Legacy of Organic Intellectuals. Engaged Scholar Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning, 8(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v8i3.70755

Suhardi. (2024). Bentuk-Bentuk Counter-Hegemoni Media Era Internet. Jurnal Media Public Relations, 4, 1–8.

Tangkudung, A. G., & Kaseger, J. Y. (2024). Hilirisasi Nikel sebagai Nilai Tambah dalam Penguatan Perekonomian Indonesia. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 5(10), 3946–3955. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i10.1591

Tela, I. A., & Yu, Z. (2025). Examining the Global Perception of Nickel Mining Environmental Impact: A Case Study of China-Indonesia Public Opinion on Earth’s Sustainability (pp. 22–42). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-646-8_3

Wijaya, A. A. (2025). Pemberian dan Pencabutan Izin Usaha Pertambangan Nikel di Raja Ampat dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum dan Demokrasi. Jurnal Media Akademik, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.62281/v3i6.2104

Downloads

Published

2025-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check