Strengthening rural food security and community welfare through ICLS 5.0: A socio-biological approach to circular agriculture

Authors

  • Kaylila Dalta Fawwaza Departement Industrial Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Vocational Studies, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, East Java 60111, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Emirsyah Rasyad Departement Industrial Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Vocational Studies, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, East Java 60111, Indonesia
  • Moh Fatichul Yaqin Rizqi Mahesa Putra Departement Industrial Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Vocational Studies, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, East Java 601111, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/jek.v3i2.2026.2556

Keywords:

fermented forage, integrated crop–livestock system, livestock manure

Abstract

Background: Nutritional disparities remain a major challenge in Indonesia’s human resource development, as the prevalence of stunting and wasting continues to vary widely across regions despite measurable national progress. These inequalities highlight the need for integrated and sustainable agricultural innovations that improve both food quality and availability while maintaining ecological balance. This study aims to analyze the potential of the Integrated Crop–Livestock System (ICLS) 5.0 as an innovation that strengthens food security and enhances nutritional value through sustainable resource management. Method: A quantitative descriptive approach based on a comprehensive literature review was conducted using secondary data from scientific journals and national databases. The ICLS 5.0 framework emphasizes circular resource use, converting agricultural residues such as rice straw, corn stalks, and dry leaves into fermented forage, while livestock manure is processed into organic fertilizer through bioactivation and composting. Data were analyzed to assess improvements in productivity, soil fertility, and resource efficiency. Finding: Implementation of the ICLS 5.0 model can increase agricultural and livestock productivity by 30–40%, enhance soil carbon and nitrogen content, and reduce production costs by 30–50% through the substitution of chemical fertilizers and industrial feed. The system also reduces greenhouse gas emissions and improves food self-sufficiency in rural areas by promoting local feed and fertilizer production. Conclusion: The ICLS 5.0 approach provides a low-cost, scalable, and knowledge-based innovation that aligns with national efforts to strengthen food and nutrition security. By integrating crops and livestock within a circular economy framework, this model supports sustainable agricultural intensification and contributes directly to achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 2 Zero Hunger, SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production, and SDG 13 Climate Action), while enhancing the resilience and welfare of rural farming communities. Novelty/Originality of this article: This innovation introduces an adaptive crop–livestock integration model suitable for various land scales, complemented by a localized ICLS framework. It also provides simple technical guidelines for converting organic waste into fertilizer, feed, or energy, along with the development of micro-scale circular economy systems for farmer and livestock groups.

References

Agbeja, A. O., Olaifa, K. A., Akindolu, D. R., Salau, H. O., & Akinlade. (2021). Climate change and livestock production: A review. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 2021(4), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.51791/njap.v48i4.2991

Amalia, T. A., Adibrata, J. A., & Setiawan, R. R. . (2022). Strategi Ketahanan Pangan di Masa Pandemi Covid-19: Penguatan Potensi Desa Melalui Sustainable Farming di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 18(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.20956/jsep.v18i2.13733

Barokah, A. S., & Soetono, B. (2024). Article in The Social Perspective Journal. The Social Perspective Journal, 3(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.53947/tspj.v3i1.795

Badan Pangan Nasional. (2024). Indeks Ketahanan Pangan (IKP) Tingkat Kabupaten/Kota Tahun 2024 (12 Indikator) [Dataset]. Badan Pangan Nasional.

Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. (2024). Rata-Rata Konsumsi Kalori dan Protein per Kapita per Hari Menurut Provinsi, 2007-2024. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia.

Bueno, I. T., Antunes, J. F. G., Dos Reis, A. A., Werner, J. P. S., Toro, A. P. S. G. D. D., Figueiredo, G. K. D. A., Esquerdo, J. C. D. M., Lamparelli, R. A. C., Coutinho, A. C., & Magalhães, P. S. G. (2023). Mapping integrated crop-livestock systems in Brazil with planetscope time series and deep learning. Remote Sensing of Environment, 299, 113886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113886

Colazo, J. C., Herrero, J. de D., Sager, R., Guzmán, M. L., & Zaman, M. (2022). Contribution of integrated crop-livestock systems to climate smart agriculture in Argentina. Land, 11(11), 2060. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11112060

Domínguez-Hernández, A., Juárez-Velázquez, A., Domínguez-Hernández, E., Zepeda-Bautista, R., Hernández-Aguilar, C., & Domínguez-Hernández, M. (2025). Impact of the integration level in crop–livestock systems on biomass production, nutrient recycling, and energy efficiency. Biomass, 5(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass5020019

Hapsari, N. I., & Rudiarto, I. (2017). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kerawanan dan ketahanan pangan dan implikasinya di Kabupaten Rembang. Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan, 5(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.5.2.125-140

Hida, D. A. N., Rachmina, D., & Rifin, A. (2023). Optimizing the integrated farming system of coffee and goat to maximize farmers’ income in North Sumatra, Indonesia. Agro Bali: Agricultural Journal, 6(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.37637/ab.v6i1.1147

Ibrahim, & Hadiana, M. H. (2023). Farm resources utilization on the integrated system of Bali cattle–palm oil. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak Universitas Padjadjaran, 23(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.24198/jit.v23i1.44401

Laber, M., Klimek, P., Bruckner, M., Yang, L., & Thurner, S. (2023). Shock propagation from the Russia–Ukraine conflict on international multilayer food production network determines global food availability. Nature Food, 4, 771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00771-4

Ramlah, U. (2021). Gangguan kesehatan pada anak usia dini akibat kekurangan gizi dan upaya pencegahannya. Ana’Bualava: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 2(2) https://doi.org/10.24239/abulava.Vol2.Iss2.40

Risvenjaya, E., Yuliawan, D., & Andrian, T. (2024). Analisis indeks ketahanan pangan di Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Journal on Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v7i1.7690

Sari, E. N. (2022). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kejadian Wasting pada Balita Umur 1-5 Tahun. Jurnal Kesehatan Poltekkes Kemenkes RI Pangkalpinang, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.32922/jkp.v10i1.433

Sarwono, K. A., Rohmatussolihat, R., Watman, M., Ratnakomala, S., Astuti, W. D., Fidriyanto, R., Ridwan, R., & Widyastuti, Y. (2022). Characteristics of fresh rice straw silage quality prepared with addition of lactic acid bacteria and crude cellulase. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 7(3), 481–499. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2022030

Sekaran, U., Lai, L., Ussiri, D. A. N., Kumar, S., & Clay, S. (2021). Role of integrated crop-livestock systems in improving agriculture production and addressing food security – A review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 5, 100190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100190

Soares, S., Souza, W., Homem, B., Ramalho, I., Borré, J., Pereira, M., Pinheiro, É., Marchao, R., Alves, B., Boddey, R., & Urquiaga, S. (2024). The use of integrated crop–livestock systems as a strategy to improve soil organic matter in the Brazilian Cerrado. Agronomy, 14(11), 2547. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112547

Soares, J. P. G., Werner, J. F., Pradère, J. P., Matheus, J. R. V., Kichel, A. N., & Favareto, R. (2024). Integrated crop–livestock systems as circular economy strategies for sustainable agri-food systems. Circular Economy, 6, 100238. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092071

Suryana, A. (2015). Toward sustainable Indonesian food security 2025: Challenges and its responses. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 32(2), 123-135. https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/fae/article/view/1123

Sutrisno, A. D. (2022). Kebijakan Sistem Ketahanan Pangan Daerah. Kebijakan : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 13(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.23969/kebijakan.v13i1.4862

Swastika, D. K. S., Priyanti, A., Hasibuan, A. M., Sahara, D., Arya, N. N., Malik, A., Ilham, N., Sayekti, A. L., Triastono, J., Asnawi, R., Sugandi, D., Hayati, N. Q., & Atman, A. (2024). Pursuing circular economics through the integrated crop-livestock systems: An integrative review on practices, strategies and challenges post Green Revolution in Indonesia. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 18, 101269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101269

Thu, T. T. P., & Loan, N. T. (2024). Multi-component composting of agricultural by-products improves compost quality and effects on the growth and yield of cucumber. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 25(6), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/187036

Tranggono, R. Moch. Januar Ibnu Akbar, Valina Zakiah Rahma Putri, Nanda Arifah, Omar Galih Wikarsa, & Rafish Jadwa Ramadhan. (2023). Krisis Ketahanan Pangan Penyebab Ketergantungan Impor Tanaman Pangan di Indonesia. Scientific Journal of Social Humanities, 1(2). https://journal.csspublishing.com/index.php/azzahra/article/view/56

Werner, J. P. S., Belgiu, M., Bueno, I. T., Dos Reis, A. A., Toro, A. P. S. G. D., Antunes, J. F. G., Stein, A., Lamparelli, R. A. C., Magalhães, P. S. G., Coutinho, A. C., Esquerdo, J. C. D. M., & Figueiredo, G. K. D. A. (2024). Mapping integrated crop–livestock systems using fused Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope time series and deep learning. Remote Sensing, 16(8), 1421. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16081421

Widadie, F., & Agustono. (2015). Comparison of integrated crop-livestock and non-integrated farming systems for financial feasibility, technical efficiency and adoption (Case of farmers in Gunung Kidul regency. Article in Journal of the International Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Sciences. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20153252129

Widarni, N. A. A., Kusumastuti, T. A., & Putra, A. R. S. (2020). A study on farmers’ choice in integrating paddy and cattle farming as farm management practices. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture, 45(4), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.14710/jitaa.45.4.356-364

Widiastuti, D. P., Hatta, M., Aziz, H., Permana, D., Santari, P. T., Rohaeni, E. S., Ahmad, S. N., Bakrie, B., Tan, S. S., & Rakhmani, S. I. W. (2024). Peatlands management for sustainable use on the integration of maize and cattle in a circular agriculture system in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Heliyon, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31259

Zhao, J., Dong, Z., Li, J., Chen, L., Bai, Y., Jia, Y., & Shao, T. (2019). Effects of sugar sources and doses on fermentation dynamics, carbohydrates changes, in vitro digestibility and gas production of rice straw silage. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 18(1), 1345–1355. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2019.1659106

Downloads

Published

2026-01-29

How to Cite

Fawwaza, K. D., Rasyad, M. E., & Putra, M. F. Y. R. M. (2026). Strengthening rural food security and community welfare through ICLS 5.0: A socio-biological approach to circular agriculture. Journal of Earth Kingdom, 3(2), 108–130. https://doi.org/10.61511/jek.v3i2.2026.2556

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check