Pet ownership: Their interactions towards pets and perceptions of animal welfare in zoos

Authors

  • Muhammad Aulia Majid Department of Environmental Science, Graduate School of Sustainable Development, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java 16424, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/jek.v3i2.2026.2475

Keywords:

animal welfare, human-animal interactions, pet owner perceptions, pets, zoos

Abstract

Background: Pets play an important role in human life. Many studies have shown that the presence of pets can improve the physical and mental health of their owners. The relationship between owners and pets tends to result in more positive behavior from owners towards other animals. Zoos are one of the locations where humans interact with various animals. The presence of humans (visitors) in zoos harms animal welfare in that location. Therefore, this study aims to determine the effect of pet ownership on perceptions of animal welfare in zoos. Methods: This study uses a quantitative method that examines the impact of pet ownership on perceptions of animal welfare in zoos. Through quantitative methods, a survey was conducted to collect data on public perceptions, both pet owners and non-owners, to see their perceptions of animal welfare in zoos. Findings: The study's results revealed that pet owners had higher HAIS values ​​than those who did not have pets. Then the perception of animal welfare in general showed that pet owners tended to have lower perceptions of animal welfare than non-pet owners. The relationship between the level of relationship closeness between humans and pets and the perception of animal welfare showed a low negative correlation, which means that the higher the HAIS value, the lower the perception of welfare towards zoo animals. Pet owners tend to be more sensitive to the conditions of animals that are less than ideal. The following research reveals that positive human interactions with pets will encourage positive behavior toward other animals. Conclusion: This study concludes that pet owners have a more critical perception of animal welfare in zoos than visitors who do not have pets. The level of closeness of interaction also influences the critical behavior of pet owners towards animal welfare conditions in zoos. Novelty/Originality of this article: The novelty of this study lies in identifying the perceptions of zoo visitors through their level of interaction with pets. This study is unique because it uses the closeness level of interaction with pets to see the zoo visitor's perceptions of animal welfare in zoos.

References

Binngißer, J., Wilhelm, C., & Randler, C. (2013). Attitudes toward Animals among German Children and Adolescents. Anthrozoös, 26(3), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303713X13697429463475

Bouma, E. M. C, Reijgwart, M. L., & Dijkstra, A. (2022). Family member, best friend, child or 'just' a pet, owners' relationship perceptions and consequences for their cats. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010193

Browning, H., & Veit, W. (2021). Freedom and animal welfare. Animals, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041148

Clark, B., Stewart, G. B., Panzone, L. A. Kyriazakis, I., & Frewer, L. J. (2016). A Systematic Review of Public Attitudes, Perceptions and Behaviours Towards Production Diseases Associated with Farm Animal Welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29, 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9615-x

Cleary, M., West, S., Visentin, D., Phipps, M., Westman, M., Vesk, K., & Kornhaber, R. (2021). The Unbreakable Bond: The Mental Health Benefits and Challenges of Pet Ownership for People Experiencing Homelessness. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 42(8), 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2020.1843096

Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage.

Demartoto, A. (2021). Zoo management for animal welfare through sustainable tourism principles. In Development, Social Change and Environmental Sustainability (pp. 157–161). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003178163-34

Ellis, J. J., Stryhn, H., & Cockram, M. S. (2021). Effects of the provision of a hiding box or shelf on the behaviour and faecal glucocorticoid metabolites of bold and shy cats housed in single cages. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 236, 105221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105221

Farm Animal Welfare Council. (1993.). Second Report on Priorities for Research and Development in Farm Animal Welfare. DEFRA.

Fennell, D. A. (2022). Animal health warning labels in nature-based, ecotourism & wildlife tourism. In Journal of Ecotourism, 22(3), 451–458). https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2023.2191895

Foreman-Worsley, R., Finka, L. R., Ward, S. J., & Farnworth, M. J. (2021). Indoors or outdoors? An international exploration of owner demographics and decision making associated with lifestyle of pet cats. Animals, 11(2), 253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020253

Forrest, R., Pearson, M., & Awawdeh, L. (2023). Pet Owners' Attitudes and Opinions towards Cat and Dog Care Practices in Aotearoa New Zealand. Veterinary Sciences, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10100606

Fournier, A. K., Berry, T. D., Letson, E., & Chanen, R. (2016). The Human–Animal Interaction Scale: Development and Evaluation. Anthrozoos, 29(3), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2016.1181372

Fournier, A. K., Letson, E. A., & Berry, T D. (2017). HAIS human-animal interaction scale & manual. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Gómez-Leal, R., Costa, A., Megías-Robles, A., Fernández-Berrocal, P., Faria, L. (2021). Relationship between emotional intelligence and empathy towards humans and animals. PeerJ, 9. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11274

Kline, C., & Fischer, B. (2023). Morality on holiday: inspiring ethical behavior in animal-based tourism through non-moral values. Tourism Recreation Research, 48(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2021.1911273

Lacinak, A. M. (2023). Animals' Relationships With Caregivers and Conspecifics are Associated with Zoo Visitors' Perceptions of Animals' Emotions and Welfare States. Anthrozoos, 36(5), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2023.2232659

Lanzoni, L., Whatford, L., Atzori, A. S., Chincarini, M., Giammarco, M., Fusaro, I., & Vignola, G. (2023). The challenge to integrate animal welfare indicators into the Life Cycle Assessment. animals, 17(5), 100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100794

Mellor, D. J., Beausoleil, N. J., Littlewood, K. E., McLean, A. N., McGreevy, P. D., Jones, B., & Wilkins, C. (2020). The 2020 five domains model: Including human–animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals, 10(10), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101870

Mellor, D. J. (2016). Updating animal welfare thinking: Moving beyond the “five freedoms” towards “A life worth living.” Animals, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6030021

Mellor, D. J., & Reid, C. S. W. (1994). WellBeing International WellBeing International WBI Studies. Repository WBI Studies Repository.

Miller, L. J., & Chinnadurai, S. K. (2023). Beyond the Five Freedoms: Animal Welfare at Modern Zoological Facilities. Animals, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13111818

Moorhouse, T. P., Dahlsjö, C. A. L., Baker, S. E., D'Cruze, N. C., & Macdonald, D. W. (2015). The customer isn't always right - Conservation and animal welfare implications of the increasing demand for wildlife tourism. PLOS ONE, 10(10).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138939

McCulloch, S. P. (2013). A Critique of FAWC's Five Freedoms as a Framework for the Analysis of Animal Welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26(5), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-012-9434-7

Nurhayati-Wolff, H. (2022). Indonesia: pet ownership rate 2022. Statista.

Ojo, S. O. (2019). Evaluation of Visitors' Satisfaction and their Perception about Animal Welfare in University of Ibadan Zoological Garden. Ibadan Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(1), 93-98. https://ijar.org.ng/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/OJO-SO.pdf

Puspitasari, A., Masy'ud, B., & Sunarminto, T. (2015). The Relationship between Visitor Perception and Behavior Towards the Welfare of Timor Deer in Cikembulan Garut Zoo. Media Konservasi, 20(1). https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/konservasi/article/view/10971

Ramirez, V., Frisbie, L., Robinson, J., & Rabinowitz, P. M. (2022). The Impact of Pet Ownership on Healthcare-Seeking Behavior in Individuals Experiencing Homelessness. Anthrozoos, 35(5), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2022.2042082

Randler, C., Adan, A., Antofie, M. -M., Arrona-Palacios, A., Candido, M., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Chandrakar, P., Demirhan, E., Detsis, V., Di Milia, L., Fančovičová, J., Gericke, N., Haldar, P., Heidari, Z., Jankowski, K. S., Lehto, J. E., Lundell-Creagh, R., Medina-Jerez, W., Meule, A., Vollmer, C. (2021). Animal Welfare Attitudes: Effects of Gender and Diet in University Samples from 22 Countries. Animals, 11(7), 1893. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11071893

Rizzolo, J. B. (2023). Wildlife tourism and consumption. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(5), 1181–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1957903

Schleicher, M., Cash, S. B., & Freeman, L. M. (2019). Determinants of pet food purchasing decisions. The Canadian veterinary journal, 60(6), 644–650. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6515811/

Scoresby, K. J., Strand, E. B., Ng, Z., Brown, K. C., Stilz, C. R., Strobel, K., Barroso, C. S., & Souza, M. (2021). Pet Ownership and Quality of Life: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Veterinary Sciences, 8(12), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8120332

Sherwen, S. L., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019). The visitor effect on zoo animals: Implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare. Animals, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060366

Shuttlewood, C. Z., Greenwell, P. J., & Montrose, V. T. (2016). Pet Ownership, Attitude Toward Pets, and Support for Wildlife Management Strategies. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 21(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2016.1116029

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung.

Ward, S. J., Williams, E., Groves, G., Marsh, S., & Morgan, D. (2020). Using zoo welfare assessments to identify common issues in developing country zoos. Animals, 10(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112101

Tirto.id. (2024). Traces of Animal Death Cases in Indonesian Zoos. Tirto.id.

Torkar, G., Fabijan, T., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). Students' care for dogs, environmental attitudes, and behavior . Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(4).https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041317

Downloads

Published

2026-01-27

How to Cite

Majid, M. A. (2026). Pet ownership: Their interactions towards pets and perceptions of animal welfare in zoos. Journal of Earth Kingdom, 3(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.61511/jek.v3i2.2026.2475

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check