Reformulation of anti-money laundering policy on crypto assets through the integrated criminal justice system with global regulatory standards

Authors

  • Dewi Arum Maulida Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Jawa Tengah 50275, Indonesia
  • Vima Na’ima Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Jawa Tengah 50275, Indonesia
  • Permata Al Azza Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Jawa Tengah 50275, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/seesdgj.v3i2.2026.2313

Keywords:

crypto assets, money laundering, integrated criminal justice system

Abstract

Background: The emergence of crypto assets as a digital asset has transformed the global financial system, offered innovation but also generated new risks, particularly money laundering (ML). In Indonesia, crypto assets are not recognized as legal tender but has shifted from being classified as a commodity under Commodity Futures Trading Supervisory Agency/Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi (BAPPEBTI) to a digital financial asset under the supervision of Financial Services Authority/Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) through the enactment of the Law on Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector/Undang-Undang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan (UU P2SK), PP No.49/2024, and POJK No.27/2024. However, the current Anti Money Laundering (AML) framework, especially Law on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering/Undang-Undang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (UU PPTPPU), has not fully integrated Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations, especially regarding Virtual Assets (VA) and Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP).  Method: This study employs a doctrinal legal research method utilizing statute, comparative, and conceptual approaches to analyze the reformulation of the Indonesian Anti-Money Laundering Law in alignment with Lawrence Friedman’s legal system theory. The analysis follows a deductive logic by synthesizing primary and secondary legal materials to develop a policy framework that integrates an Integrated Criminal Justice System (ICJS) with machine learning technology for detecting crypto-based money laundering. Finding: Findings reveal that the absence of VA and VASP in Indonesian Anti-Money Laundering Law creates legal gaps that may be exploited by criminals. Reformulation is urgently needed by incorporating VA and VASP definitions, strengthening reporting obligations, and integrating technology such as machine learning in the PPATK’s goAML platform. Conclusion: An Integrated Criminal Justice System (ICJS) model is required to harmonize regulation, institutional coordination, and law enforcement culture. Such a framework is expected to create an adaptive AML system against cryptocurrency-based ML while maintaining financial integrity and supporting sustainable economic development. Novelty/Originality of this article: This research introduces a "techno-legal" transition model for Indonesia’s AML regime, bridging the legislative gap between the new Law on Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector and the outdated Indonesian Anti-Money Laundering Law.

References

Arnone, G., Scire’, G., & Bivona, E. (2025). The (mis)use of cryptocurrencies by criminal organizations: a systematic literature review. Digital Finance 7, 815–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-025-00148-1

Amin, I., Hidayat, S., Saepudin, L., & Taufan. (2024). Penggunaan pendekatan integrated criminal justice system dalam penanggulangan tindak pidana narkotika. Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum, 9(1), 76–94. https://jkh.unram.ac.id/index.php/jkh/article/view/172

Ardiano, C., Pujiyono, & Rochaeti, N. (2022). Analisis yuridis kriminologis penggunaan mata uang elektronik Bitcoin sebagai sarana tindak pidana pencucian uang. Diponegoro Law Journal, 1(1), 9. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/32914

Budhi, H., & Kade, G. I. (2021). Bitcoin: Potensi tindak kejahatan dan pertanggungjawaban pidana. Rajawali Pers.

Ferreira, I. C. (2025). The legal status of the Financial Action Task Force in the international legal system. BRILL.

Fitriana, W., & Nuraini, M. D. (2023). Juridical analysis of legal updates on crypto assets in Indonesia (Comparative study of Indonesian law with Singapore and Islamic law views). Journal of Transcendental Law, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.23917/jtl.v5i1.2476

FATF. (2025). International standards on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism & proliferation. Financial Action Task Force.

Garnasih, Y. (2016). Penegakan hukum anti pencucian uang dan permasalahannya di Indonesia (3rd ed.). Rajawali Press.

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Hanin, F. G., & Dewayanto, T. (2024). Peran machine learning dan deep learning dalam pendeteksian pencucian uang: A systematic literature review. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 13(3), 5. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article/view/46110

Harahap, M (2025). Kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penanganan digital pencucian uang berbasis aset di Indonesia. Buletin Konstitusi, 6(1). https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/KONSTITUSI/article/view/28892

Harry. (2024). Langkah pemerintah RI diapresiasi dalam mewaspadai penyalahgunaan aset kripto untuk TPPU. Pasar Dana

Hidayat, D., Benny, & Sebyar, M. H. (2024). Implikasi hukum perpindahan pengawasan aset kripto dari Bappebti ke OJK terhadap pelaku industri dan investor. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial, 4(1), 889. https://journal.stekom.ac.id/index.php/Hakim/article/view/2206

Hotta, A. Y. (2025). Pemahaman terhadap asas kepastian hukum melalui konstruksi penalaran positivisme hukum. Jurnal Hukum Dehasen, 1(1), 23–28. https://jurnal.unived.ac.id/index.php/juhude/article/view/7733

Karmila, F., Roni, D. I., Naibaho, I. P., Turnip, M. B., Triyatiningsih, P., & Silalahi, F. G. (2021, May). Analisis peran PPATK sebagai salah satu lembaga dalam menanggulangi money laundering di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 22. https://e-journal.janabadra.ac.id/index.php/KH/article/view/1661

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Revised ed.). Prenada Media.

Muladi. (2017). Sistem peradilan pidana terpadu dan sistem penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Prenada Media.

Nasution, B. (2008). Rejim anti-money laundering di Indonesia. Bandung: Books Terrace & Library.

Nugroho, A. R. (2024, April 19). PPATK ungkap pencucian uang lewat kripto sebesar Rp 800 miliar. CNBC Indonesia.

Piternalis, C., & Hariyanto, D. R. S. (2024). Koherensi implementasi pendekatan normatif terhadap peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary, 3(1), 149–155. https://journals.ldpb.org/index.php/eljbn/article/view/226

PPATK. (2020). Implementasi aplikasi pelaporan goAML. Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan.

Rachmahdani, J. N. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku pencucian uang melalui aset kripto. Jurist-Diction, 4(1), 724. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v6i4.51220

Raharjo. (2022). Uang masa depan: Blockchain, bitcoin, cryptocurrencies. Yayasan Prima

Rohman, M. N. (2021). Tinjauan yuridis normatif terhadap regulasi mata uang kripto (cryptocurrency) di Indonesia. Jurnal Supremasi, 2(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v11i2.1284 .

Sam, A. B. L., Yolanda, Hutapea, M. R. M., & Setyawan, S. (2022, February). Legalitas cryptocurrency dalam tindak pidana kejahatan pencucian uang. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 117. https://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/dih/article/view/6043/4662

Setiadi, E., & Kristian. (2017). Sistem peradilan pidana terpadu dan sistem penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Prenada Media Group.

Songtinus, R., & Siregar. (2023). Juridical analysis of the use of cryptocurrencies as futures trading commodities according to positive law in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Replik (JHR), 11(1), 233–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v11i2.8975

Tambun, M. A., & Putuhena, M. I. (2022). Tata kelola pembentukan regulasi terkait perdagangan mata uang kripto (cryptocurrency) sebagai aset kripto (crypto asset). Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law, 1(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.32734/mah.v1i1.8314

Thorpe, J. (2022). US$ 8.6 billion worth of cryptocurrency laundered by cybercriminals in 2021. International Security Journal. https://internationalsecurityjournal.com/cryptocurrency-laundered-in-2021/.

OJK. (2025). FATF recommendation updated February 2025. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.

Widowati, H. (2024). Kripto makin populer, pengguna Binance capai 200 juta. Katadata.

Yanuar, M. A. (2022). Risiko dan posibilitas penyalahgunaan aset kripto dalam kejahatan pencucian. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 52(2), 169–188. https://jdih.ppatk.go.id/storage/dokumen_produk_hukum/0b984df0493aa4951b5dac023ea84200.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-01-27

How to Cite

Maulida, D. A., Na’ima, V., & Al Azza, P. (2026). Reformulation of anti-money laundering policy on crypto assets through the integrated criminal justice system with global regulatory standards. Social, Ecology, Economy for Sustainable Development Goals Journal, 3(2), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.61511/seesdgj.v3i2.2026.2313

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check