The role of stakeholders in revitalizing religious affairs offices (KUA) for bureaucratic reform in public services: Perspective for sustainable development goals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/seesdgj.v2i2.2025.1089Keywords:
culture set, KUA infrastructure, KUA revitalization, KUA services, mindsetAbstract
Background: Community service at the Office of Religious Affairs/Kantor Urusan Agama (KUA) is a service that has received a lot of correction from the people in West Nusa Tenggara Province. In this regard, KUA services will be improved by using KUA revitalization. However, the implementation of KUA revitalization had many obstacles that could not be resolved in a short time. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate and develop the KUA revitalization program in West Nusa Tenggara Province. Methods: This analysis was carried out using a qualitative approach, data analysis was carried out using a descriptive approach. Findings: The results of the analysis are as follows: 1) The KUA revitalization program is not only an Islamic Community Guidance program but a collaboration work around Ministry of Religious Affair and all KUA stakeholder. 2) KUA revitalization is not only a change in mindset and culture set but also need contribution from agent of change. 3) The main changes in KUA revitalization are changes in human resources. 4) Improvement of infrastructure facilities is carried out based on the priority scale of KUA conditions. 5) It is necessary to change the linear rules with the KUA revitalization program, especially the rules related to SBSN so that they can work together to accelerate the KUA revitalization progress. Conclusion: The KUA revitalization program will be successful if there is cooperation from all work units within the Ministry of Religion. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study offers a unique contribution by highlighting the complex interplay between organizational change, stakeholder collaboration, and regulatory alignment in the context of KUA revitalization, a topic that has not been widely studied in previous research.
References
Alifia, N. A. N. (2013). Kualitas pelayanan pencatatan nikah di Kantor Urusan Agama (KUA) Kecamatan Sukolilo Surabaya. Publica, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.26740/publika.v3n6.p%25p
Austin, M. S., & Harkins, D. A. (2008). Assessing change: Can organizational learning “work” for schools? The Learning Organization, 15(2), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470810852302
Austin, M. S., & Harkins, D. A. (2008). Shifting spaces and emerging voices: Participation, support, and conflict in one school administrative team. Early Education and Development, 19(6), 907–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802356653
Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Batrancea, I., & Gaban, L. (2018). The strength of the relationship between shadow economy and corruption: Evidence from a worldwide country-sample. Social Indicators Research, 138(3), 1119–1143. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s11205-017-1696-z
Bazarah, J., Jubaidi, A., & Hubaib, F. (2021). Konsep pelayanan publik di Indonesia (Analisis literasi penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik di Indonesia). Dedikasi, 22(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.31293/ddk.v22i2.5860
Benedikter, S. (2016). Bureaucratisation and the state revisited: Critical reflections on administrative reforms in post-renovation Vietnam. International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 12(1). https://ijaps.usm.my/?page_id=3102
Berenschot, W. (2018). Incumbent bureaucrats: Why elections undermine civil service reform in Indonesia. Public Administration and Development, 38(4), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1838
Denhardt, J. D., & Denhardt, R. B. (2004). The New Public Service: An approach to reform. International Review of Public Administration, 8(1). https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v8y2003i1p3-10.html
Desectasari, D. P., & Ristianti, N. S. (2019). The need for design elements of inclusive public service space for the elderly with limited balance. Jurnal Teknik Sipil & Perencanaan, 12(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.15294/jtsp.v21i2
Dwijayani, L. (2021). SWOT analysis of PSBB policy implementation at public facilities or areas in Bekasi City in March–June 2020. Journal of Indonesian Health Policy and Administration, 6(2), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.7454/ihpa.v6i2.4286
Dwiyanto, A. (2005). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Ekowati, M. R. L. (2009). Revitalisasi organisasi sektor publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 9(1). https://festiva.ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/JIANA/article/view/1053
Elmore, R. F. (2005). Accountable Leadership. The Educational Forum 69, 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984677
Griffin, R. W. (2004). Manajemen (Edisi ketujuh, Jilid 2). Erlangga.
Hardiansyah. (2011). Kualitas pelayanan publik. Gava Media.
Hayat. (2017). Manajemen pelayanan publik. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kusuma, A. S., & B. M. A. (2017). Revitalisasi masjid dalam dialektika pelayanan umat dan kawasan perekonomian rakyat. Al-Idarah: Jurnal Manajemen dan Administrasi Islam, 1(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/al-idarah.v1i1.1522
Loumeau, G. (2023). Locating public facilities: Theory and micro evidence from Paris. Journal of Urban Economics, 135, 103544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2023.103544
Milen, A. (2004). Pegangan dasar pengembangan kapasitas. Pondok Pustaka Jogja.
Moleong, L. J. (2013). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Morris, J. E., Lummis, G. W., & Norman, A. E. (2019). The role of leadership in establishing a positive staff culture in a secondary school. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741143219864937
Muchtar. (2014). Pelayanan Kantor Urusan Agama terhadap pencatatan perkawinan di Kota Kediri pasca deklarasi FKK-KUA se-Jawa Timur tahun 2013. Jurnal Multikultural & Multireligius, 13(1). https://jurnalharmoni.kemenag.go.id/index.php/harmoni/article/view/146
Mulyadi, V. R. (2013). Kepemimpinan dan perilaku organisasi. Rajawali Press.
Polshom, M. B. (2019). The school leader’s role in school-based development. Educational Research, 61(4), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1677171
Saragi, S. (2017). Tinjauan revitalisasi pelayanan kesehatan dasar tentang sistem rujukan pelayanan kesehatan terhadap peserta BPJS di Puskesmas Biru-Biru. Jurnal Publik UNHAR Medan, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.46576/jpr.v2i2.306
Seller, J. M. (2012). State-society Relations. In The Sage Handbook of Governance, ed. Bevir, M. Sage Publications. https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/hdbk_governance/n15.xml?PageNum=239
Sinambela, P. L. (2018). Reformasi pelayanan publik. Sinar Grafika Offset.
Van der Heijden, M. (2010). Introduction: New perspectives on public services in early modern Europe. Journal of Urban History, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144209359137.
Wong, C. P., & Ng, D. (2021). The roles of school leaders in developing future-ready learners: The case of Singapore. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2020-0283
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sarip Sahrul Samsudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
