Beyond the balance sheet: How green accounting, innovation, and regulation shape sustainable growth in middle-income economies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/seesdgj.v4i1.2026.2650Keywords:
green accounting, institutional quality, middle-income economies, regulatory quality, technological innovationAbstract
Background: This study investigates the influence of green accounting practices on economic growth in middle-income economies, emphasizing the mediating role of technological innovation and the moderating effect of regulatory quality. It seeks to clarify whether environmental accounting frameworks can simultaneously support economic expansion and sustainability across diverse institutional and innovation contexts. Methods: Guided by Ecological Modernization Theory, Endogenous Growth Theory, and Institutional Theory, the study uses balanced panel data from 24 middle-income countries spanning 2010–2023. Fixed-effects regressions assess direct effects, Baron and Kenny’s (1986) mediation framework examines technological innovation’s role, and moderated regression models evaluate regulatory quality’s conditioning influence. Findings: Green accounting significantly enhances aggregate GDP growth but may constrain short-term per capita welfare, reflecting transitional distributional trade-offs. While green accounting promotes technological innovation, this channel does not mediate its effect on economic growth. Strong regulatory quality, particularly rule-of-law enforcement, amplifies the positive impact of green accounting on economic performance. Conclusion: Policymakers should integrate green accounting into broader governance and innovation strategies. Aligning environmental disclosure with fiscal incentives, R&D investment, and transparent regulatory systems can foster inclusive and sustainable growth trajectories. Findings may have limited generalizability across all middle-income economies due to institutional heterogeneity and data constraints. Future studies could expand country coverage and examine sector-specific effects. Novelty/Originality of this article: The study offers an integrated empirical framework demonstrating how institutional quality and innovation capacity jointly shape the developmental returns of green accounting, providing actionable insights for sustainable growth in emerging economies.
References
Adeleye, I., Luiz, J., Muthuri, J., & Amaeshi, K. (2020). Business ethics in Africa: The role of institutional context, social relevance, and development challenges. Journal of business ethics, 717-729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04338-x
Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P., & Prantl, S. (2009). The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. The review of economics and statistics, 91(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.1.20
Alatrash, M. A., Bein, M. A., & Samour, A., (2025). The Impact of World Uncertainty, Environmental Policy Stringency, and Technological Innovation on Environmental Sustainability: Evidence from High-Income Countries. Sustainability (2071-1050), 17(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031134
Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Spatial panel data models. In Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 391-424. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5_13
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
Chen, J., & Hu, L. (2022). Does environmental regulation drive economic growth through technological innovation: Application of nonlinear and spatial spillover effect. Sustainability, 14(24), 16455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416455
Danlami, A. H., Aliyu, S., & Danmaraya, I. A. (2019). Energy production, carbon emissions and economic growth in lower-middle income countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 46(1), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-07-2017-0274
Eitrem, A., Meidell, A., & Modell, S. (2024). The use of institutional theory in social and environmental accounting research: a critical review. Accounting and Business Research, 54(7), 775-810. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2024.2328934
Elhassan, T. (2025). Green Technology Innovation, Green Financing, and Economic Growth in G7 Countries: Implications for Environmental Sustainability. Economics Innovative and Economics Research Journal, 13(1), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2025-0023
Fazal, S., & Azam, A. (2023). Moderating Role of Governance in Growth-Technology-Environment Nexus: Evidence from Developing Economies. iRASD Journal of Economics, 5(2), 486-508. https://doi.org/10.52131/joe.2023.0502.0141
Ferreira, J. J., Lopes, J. M., Gomes, S., & Rammal, H. G. (2023). Industry 4.0 implementation: Environmental and social sustainability in manufacturing multinational enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 404, 136841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136841
Field, A. J. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700040493
Ganda, F. (2019). The environmental impacts of financial development in OECD countries: a panel GMM approach. Environmental science and pollution research, 26(7), 6758-6772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04143-z
Hsu, C. C., Quang-Thanh, N., Chien, F., Li, L., & Mohsin, M. (2021). Evaluating green innovation and performance of financial development: mediating concerns of environmental regulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(40), 57386-57397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14499-w
Kamah, M., Riti, J. S., & Bin, P. (2021). Inclusive growth and environmental sustainability: the role of institutional quality in sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(26), 34885-34901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13125-z
Li, D., & Hu, S. (2021). How does technological innovation mediate the relationship between environmental regulation and high-quality economic development? Empirical evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(4), 2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042231
Maama, H., & Appiah, K. O. (2019). Green accounting practices: lesson from an emerging economy. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 11(4), 456-478. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrfm-02-2017-0013
Mol, A. P., Spaargaren, G., & Sonnenfeld, D. A. (2020). Ecological modernisation: Three decades of policy, practice and theoretical reflection. In The ecological modernisation reader, 3-14. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003061069
Obobisa, E. S., Chen, H., & Mensah, I. A. (2023). Transitions to sustainable development: the role of green innovation and institutional quality. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(7), 6751-6780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02328-0
Pramesti, F, A. A., & Novita, F. (2024). The Role of Green Accounting in Promoting a Green Economy: Integrating Environmental Considerations into Financial Systems for Sustainable Development. JIMU: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 2(3), 517-527. https://doi.org/10.70294/jimu.v2i03.392
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, 98(5), S71-S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
Scott, W. R. (2017). Institutional theory: Onward and upward. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 900, 853-71. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n34
Stiglitz, J. E., fitoussi, J.-P., & Durand, M. (Eds.). (2019). For Good Measure: An Agenda for Moving Beyond GDP. The New Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.26193370
Sumayyah, S., Damayanti, R. W., & Zahara, I. (2025). Green innovation, green accounting, and performance: The moderating role of green intellectual capital. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 26(1), 270-297. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v26i1.24362
Teklie, D. K., & Yağmur, M. H. (2024). The role of green innovation, renewable energy, and institutional quality in promoting green growth: evidence from African countries. Sustainability, 16(14), 6166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146166
Wang, F. (2023). The intermediary and threshold effect of green innovation in the impact of environmental regulation on economic Growth: Evidence from China. Ecological Indicators, 153, 110371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110371
Wiredu, I., Osei Agyemang, A., & Agbadzidah, S. Y. (2023). Does green accounting influences ecological sustainability? Evidence from a developing economy. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2240559. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2240559
World Bank Group. (2024). Global Economic Prospects: June 2024. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-2058-8
Zhou, J., Xu, X., Jiang, R., & Cai, J. (2021). Evaluation of sustainable economic and environmental development evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 30(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.298665
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zakaria Abubakari, Redruth Nyaaba Ayimpoya, Mohammed Owusu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
