The impact of illegal online loans on student financial well-being and academic persistence

Logan Gunadi Wirawan; Ni Made Martini Puteri

doi:10.61511/pips.v2i1.2025.1781

Authors

Logan Gunadi Wirawan Department of Criminology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java 16424, Indonesia
Ni Made Martini Puteri Department of Criminology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java 16424,, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/pips.v2i1.2025.1781

Keywords:

illegal online loans, student financial stress, academic persistence, digital lending, financial exploitation

Abstract

Background: The increasing prevalence of illegal online lending (pinjol) in Indonesia has raised concerns regarding its impact on students. Despite their status as educated individuals, many students face financial hardships that push them to seek alternative financial solutions, including illegal online loans. This research explores the factors leading students to use illegal online loans, the victimization process, and the long-term consequences on their academic and financial well-being. Methods: This study employs a qualitative research approach using a critical criminology framework to analyze the structural factors contributing to student victimization. Data were collected through structured interviews with seven students from different universities in Indonesia, all of whom had firsthand experience as illegal online loan users. Findings: Many students refrain from reporting their cases due to fear of social stigma, legal repercussions, and the perception that authorities may not take their complaints seriously. Students face financial strain due to tuition fees, living expenses, and societal expectations to be independent. Many are forced to seek quick financial solutions, leading them to illegal lending platforms. Victims often face intimidation and threats from debt collectors, including exposure of personal information. Conclusions: Illegal online loans create significant financial, psychological, and academic challenges for students. The exploitative nature of these loans exacerbates existing economic inequalities, forcing students into cycles of debt and distress. Novelty/Originality of this Article: This study offers a new perspective on the role of financial stress and social expectations in student involvement with illegal online lending. Unlike previous research that focuses solely on digital lending regulation, this study examines the personal experiences of student borrowers and the structural factors contributing to their financial victimization. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, financial institutions, and educators in developing preventive strategies to reduce student dependency on illegal online loans.

References

Abdullah, A. (2021). Analisis Pengetahuan Pinjaman Online Pada Masyarakat Surakarta. JESI (jurnal ekonomi Syariah Indonesia), 11(2), 108-114. https://ejournal.almaata.ac.id/index.php/JESI/article/view/1998

Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. AGNPIC. https://philpapers.org/rec/AGNPIC/

Agnew, R. (2017). General strain theory: Current status and directions for further research. In Taking stock (pp. 101-123). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315130620-4

Amin, A., Sasongko, R. N., & Yuneti, A. (2022). Kebijakan Kartu Indonesia Pintar untuk memerdekakan mahasiswa kurang mampu. Journal Of Administration and Educational Management (Alignment), 5(1), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.31539/alignment.v5i1.3803

Angkasa, A., Wamafma, F., Juanda, O., & Nunna, B. P. (2023). Illegal Online Loans in Indonesia: Between the Law Enforcement and Protection of Victim. Lex Scientia Law Review, 7(1), 119-178. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i1.67558

Bell, J., Mc Cready, P., Payne, B., Byrne, J., Morrow, D., & Murray, C. (2022). The impact of Covid-19 and associated lockdown on financial difficulties, debt and illegal money lending. Ulster University.

Borojević, T., Petrović, N., Radaković, J. A., Glomazić, H., Radojičić, M., Milenković, N., ... & Maletič, M. (2023). Youth participation for sustainable value creation: the role and prioritization of SDGs. Sustainability, 15(23), 16456. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su152316456

Disemadi, H. S. (2021). Fenomena Predatory Lending: Suatu kajian penyelenggaraan bisnis fintech P2P lending selama pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 16(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v16i1.26860

Fischer, H. E., Boone, W. J., & Neumann, K. (2023). Quantitative research designs and approaches. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 28-59). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780367855758-3

Fletcher, C., Cornett, A., Webster, J., Niznik, A., Gardner, T., & Knaff, C. (2022). Student Financial Wellness Survey: Fall 2021 Semester Results. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4291129

Hidajat, T. (2020). Unethical practices peer-to-peer lending in Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 274-282. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2019-0028

Huang, L., & Pontell, H. N. (2023). Crime and crisis in China’s P2P online lending market: a comparative analysis of fraud. Crime, Law and Social Change, 79(4), 369-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10053-y

Kempa, S., & Bilviary, A. (2022). Studi Entrepreneurial Intention Pada Mahasiswa Di Maluku. Jurnal Ekonomi Pendidikan Dan Kewirausahaan, 10(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.26740/jepk.v10n1.p5-18

Klein, G., Shtudiner, Z., & Zwilling, M. (2023). Why do peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms fail? The gap between P2P lenders' preferences and the platforms’ intentions. Electronic Commerce Research, 23(2), 709-738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09489-6

Ko, T. G. (2014). Adolescent deviant leisure activities on the internet. International Journal of Tourism Sciences, 14(3), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15980634.2014.11434698

Käfer, B. (2018). Peer-to-Peer Lending – A (Financial Stability) Risk Perspective. Review of Economics, 69(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2017-0020

Masyarafina, I., (2023). Mahasiswa Banyak Terjerat Pinjol, Bukti Literasi Keuangan di Kampus Kurang. Republika Co. Id.

Miller, J., & Palacios, W. R. (2017). Introduction: The Value of Qualitative Research for Advancing Criminological Theory 1. In Qualitative Research in Criminology (pp. 1-11). Routledge.

Murray, A. (2018). Debt-bondage and trafficking: Don’t believe the hype. In Global sex workers (pp. 51-64). Routledge.

Novitasari, E., & Ayuningtyas, T. (2021). Analisis ekonomi keluarga dan literasi ekonomi terhadap perilaku menabung mahasiswa Pendidikan Ekonomi angkatan 2016 di STKIP PGRI Lumajang. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Ekonomi, 6(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.21067/jrpe.v6i1.5293

O’Connell Davidson, J. (2013). Troubling freedom: Migration, debt, and modern slavery. Migration studies, 1(2), 176-195. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mns002

Odinet, C. K. (2020). Securitizing Digital Debts. Arizona State Law Journal, 52(2), 477-563. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3583688

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, (2023). Satgas Pemberantas Aktivitas Keuangan Ilegal Temukan 434 Tawaran Pinjol Ilegal. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2024). Statistik P2P Lending Periode Februari 2024. OJK.

Payne, B. K., & Chappell, A. (2008). Using student samples in criminological research. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19(2), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250802137226

Pramadi, Y. (2020). Indonesia Di Tengah Belantara Digital: Merdeka Atau Tidak Berdaya? Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 22(2), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.14203/JMB.V22I2.1117

Pramesti, N. I. (2023). Pengaruh Literasi Keuangan Digital, Perilaku Keuangan dan Impulsive Buying Terhadap Kerentanan Keuangan Dengan Pay Later Sebagai Pemoderasi. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YKPN Yogyakarta.

Ritchie, J., Ormston, R., McNaughton Nicholls, C., & Lewis, J. (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers.

Sánchez, M. A. (2022). A multi-level perspective on financial technology transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181, 121766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121766

Savitri, A., Syahputra, A., Hayati, H., & Rofizar, H. (2021). Pinjaman Online di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 bagi Masyarakat Aceh. E-Mabis: Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis, 22(2), 116-124. https://doi.org/10.29103/e-mabis.v22i2.693

Sitepu, R. (2023). The Legal Intricacies of Illegal Pinjol and Pinjol. Journal of Social Research, 2(6), 2045-2054. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i6.957