Analisis kebijakan bantuan internasional bencana alam dalam dinamika ketahanan nasional dengan pendekatan Delphi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/napbres.v1i1.2024.653Keywords:
Delphi method, donor country, foreign aid, national resilience, natural disastersAbstract
This study uses the Delphi method to analyze the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of receiving international assistance for natural disasters in a country against the dynamics of national resilience. The Delphi method is one of the techniques used in mixed methods approaches. The researcher carried out several stages, from in-depth interviews, compiling variables for the questionnaire, and calculating the questionnaire result data to answer the research questions. The analysis will elaborate on several factors in national resilience: economy, politics, ideology, socio-culture, and defense and security. Based on the research results, four factors need to be taken into account by the government in responding to international natural disaster assistance: the type and scale of the disaster, assistance, the origin of the donor country, and the motives or interests of the donor country. It is advisable for the government to formulate policies related to its attitude to accept or reject international aid for natural disasters based on several possible conditions.
References
Carneige, A., & Dolan, L.R. (2021). The Effects of aid on recipients' reputations: Evidence from natural disaster responses. The Review of International Organization, 16: 495-519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-020-09393-y
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research design: Pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
ESCAP & UNISDR. (2010). The Asia Pacific disaster report 2010: Protecting development gains. Bangkok: ESCAP & UNISDR. https://www.unisdr.org/files/16132_asiapacificdisasterreport20101.pdf
Fachrudin. (2007). Laporan pengkajian hukum tentang mekanisme bantuan militer asing di Indonesia dalam penanggulangan bencana alam. Jakarta: Departemen Hukum dan HAM.
Hidayati, D. (2008). Kesiapsiagaan masyarakat: Paradigma baru pengelolaan bencana alam di Indonesia. Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia, Vol. III No. 1, 69-84. https://ejurnal.kependudukan.lipi.go.id/index.php/jki/article/view/164/196
Lemhannas RI. (2012). Sistem dinamika pengukuran ketahanan nasional pengukuran ketahanan nasional dan simulasi kebijakan publik. Jakarta: Lemhannas RI.
Nugroho, B.P. (2018, 22 Agustus). Infografis: Beda bencana nasional dan bukan bencana nasional. Detik.com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4177366/infografis-beda-bencana-nasional-dan-bukan-bencana-nasional
Peterson, T.M. (2017). US disaster aid and bilateral trade growth. Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(1): 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw046
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analysing industries and competitors. New York: The Free Press.
Puspita, N.Y. (2015). Tanggung Jawab Negara Untuk Menerima Bantuan Kemanusiaan Saat Tanggap Darurat Bencana Alam. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 44(2), 208-2015. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.44.2.2015.208-215
Sogge, D. (2002). Give and Take: What’s the Matter with Foreign Aid? New York: Zed Books.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan RnD. Bandung: Alphabeta.
Usman, W. (2003). Daya Tahan Bangsa. Jakarta: Program Studi Pengkajian Ketahanan Nasional Universitas Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal Of National Paradigm-Based Resilience Strategy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.