Breaking down barriers: Overcoming silo mentality in bureaucratic reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jssew.v2i1.2024.884Keywords:
bureaucratic reform, silo mentality, organizationAbstract
Background: Silo mentality has emerged as a significant obstacle in the bureaucratic reform process in Indonesia. This paper aims to investigate the underlying causes, adverse effects, and potential solutions to address silo mentality within the context of bureaucratic reform in government organizations.The study employs a qualitative approach, conducting a comprehensive review of relevant literature and analyzing the phenomenon of silo mentality in government organizations. Methods: The research draws upon various scholarly articles, government reports, and case studies to gain insights into the dynamics of silo mentality and its impact on bureaucratic reform efforts. Findings: The findings reveal that silo mentality stems from a range of factors, including leadership issues, lack of effective communication channels, and a focus on individual goals rather than organizational objectives. The presence of hierarchical structures and a lack of transparency in information sharing across different divisions contribute to the formation of silos. The impacts of silo mentality are far-reaching, resulting in reduced productivity, decreased employee morale, and diminished customer satisfaction. Conclusion: To overcome these challenges, the paper proposes several strategies. These include ensuring employee vision convergence, achieving common goals collectively, providing motivation and incentives, precise execution, and fostering collaboration among departments. The bureaucratic reform in Indonesia aims to establish a competent, professional, and integrity-driven bureaucracy that is free from corruption and serves the public effectively. However, the presence of a silo mentality hinders the realization of these goals by creating barriers to communication, collaboration, and innovation. Future research should focus on developing practical frameworks and tools to facilitate the implementation of the proposed strategies for breaking down silos and promoting a collaborative work environment within government organizations undergoing bureaucratic reform. Empirical studies examining the effectiveness of these strategies in real-world settings would provide valuable insights into their applicability and potential for success. Additionally, exploring the role of technology in enabling seamless communication and collaboration across departments could offer new avenues for addressing silo mentality in the digital age. Novelty/Originality of this Study: The novelty of the 'silo mentality' phenomenon within the context of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia, identifying its causes, impacts, and proposing strategies to overcome it in order to achieve effective governance.
References
Alves, J., & Meneses, R. (2018). Silos mentality in healthcare services. 11th annual conference of the euromed academy of business, 2018. https://emrbi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/EuroMed-11-2018.pdf
Arianto, A., Zauhar, S., & Hanafi, I. (2015). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi implementasi program pengembangan budaya kerja di Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Pati. Reformasi, 5(1), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.33366/rfr.v5i1.219
Aspina, A. (2022). ASN Berakhlak bangga melayani bangsa. Buku Kumpulan Karya Tulis Artikel Pegawai Negeri Sipil Fungsional Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah, 1 (Juli): 4. pp. 43-46. https://karya.brin.go.id/id/eprint/15070/
Bakir, C., & Gunduz, K. A. (2017). When, why and how institutional change takes place: a systematic review and a future research agenda on the importance of policy entrepreneurship in macroeconomic bureaucracies. Policy and Society, 36(4), 479–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1369676
Bento, F., Tagliabue, M., Lorenzo, F. (2020) Organizational Silos: A Scoping Review Informed by a Behavioral Perspective on Systems and Networks. Societies, 10(3):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10030056
Beunen, R., & Patterson, J. J. (2016). Analysing institutional change in environmental governance: exploring the concept of ‘institutional work.’ I2(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1257423
Cilliers, F., & Greyvenstein, H. (2012). The impact of silo mentality on team identity: An organisational case study. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 38(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v38i2.993
Daulay, H. B., Putra, B., & Ayuni, R. (2021). Pengaruh kedisiplinan, budaya organisasi dan kompetensi pegawai terhadap tingkat kepuasan pimpinan pada Stasiun Karantina Pertanian Kelas I Tanjungbalai Asahan. Manajemen dan Bisnis, 3(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.30743/jmb.v3i1.3630
Diamond, M. A., & Allcorn, S. (2009). Silo mentality. In Private Selves in Public Organizations: The Psychodynamics of Organizational Diagnosis and Change (pp. 49–72). Springer.
Ginting, R., & Haryati, T. (2011). Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia. CIVIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. https://doi.org/10.26877/civis.v1i2/Juli.588
Haning, M. T. (2019). Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia: Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Administrasi Publik. JAKPP (Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik), 4(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.31947/jakpp.v4i1.5902
Hartati, S. (2020). Penerapan Model New Public Management (NPM) dalam Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal MSDA (Manajemen Sumber Daya Aparatur), 8(2), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.33701/jmsda.v8i2.1293
Indarti, C. F. S. (2021). Flexible Working Arrangements as a Bureaucracy Reform Agenda for Work Efficiency. The Indonesian Journal of Public Administration (IJPA), 7(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.52447/ijpa.v7i2.5171
Koopmanschap, M. A., & Rutten, F. F. H. (2003). The drug budget silo mentality: the Dutch case. Value in Health, 6, S46–S51. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4733.6.s1.5.x
Le Pen, C. (2003). The drug budget silo mentality: the French case. Value in Health, 6, S10–S19. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4733.6.s1.2.x
Lestari, R. A. (2019). Reformasi Birokrasi Sebagai Pelayan Publik. Dinamika Governance: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.33005/jdg.v9i1.1421
Mohapeloa, T. (2017). Effects of silo mentality on corporate ITC’s business model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 11(1), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0105
Orešković, S. (2016). Breaking down the silo mentality in global mental health: the new role for the schools of public health. Psychiatria Danubina, 28(4), 318–320. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/259961
Patterson, J. J., & Beunen, R. (2019). Institutional work in environmental governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1538328
Picciotto, R. (2020). Book Review: Blue Marble Evaluation: Premises and Principles. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
Ridha, N. (2017). Research process, issues, variables, and research paradigms. Hikmah, 14(1), 62–70. https://e-jurnal.staisumatera-medan.ac.id/index.php/hikmah/article/view/18
Rock, D., & Schwartz, J. (2006). The neuroscience of leadership. Strategy+Business, 43.
Sedarmayanti, S. H. (2012). Strategi Penguatan Etika dan Integritas Birokrasi Dalam Rangka Pencegahan Korupsi Guna Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 9(3), 5. https://jia.stialanbandung.ac.id/index.php/jia/article/view/311
Senjaya, S., Setiawan, T., Yulianto, T., & Harianto, Y. H. (2022). Mentalitas Silo Ditinjau dari Perspektif Alkitab. Jurnal Teologi Berita Hidup, 5(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.38189/jtbh.v5i1.260
Shaw, R., & Frost, N. (2015). Breaking out of the silo mentality. Psychologist, 28(8), 638–641. https://publications.aston.ac.uk/id/eprint/27527/
Sukandar, R., Nurhajati, L., Oktaviani, R. C., & Wijayanto, X. A. (2022). Komunikasi publik Pemerintah Republik Indonesia terkait Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia. PERSPEKTIF, 11(2), 771–778. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v11i2.6281
Syafiq, M. (2019). Birokrasi di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0:(Studi Kasus Pelayanan Perijinan Memulai Usaha di Indonesia). Journal of Social Politics and Governance (JSPG), 1(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.24076/JSPG.2019v1i1.155
Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2019). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301
Widiningtyas, K. (2022). Peran Organizational Citizenship Behavior Pada Kinerja Pegawai Perbankan di Bank X. Seminar Nasional Psikologi Dan Ilmu Humaniora (SENAPIH), 1(1), 10–18. http://conference.um.ac.id/index.php/psi/article/view/2842
Yasa, A., Suswanta, S., Rafi, M., Rahmanto, F., Setiawan, D., & Iqbal Fadhlurrohman, M. (2021). Penguatan Reformasi Birokrasi Menuju Era Society 5.0 di Indonesia. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 20(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v20i1.139
Yustia, D. A., & Arifin, F. (2023). Bureaucratic reform as an effort to prevent corruption in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2166196
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Sustainability, Society, and Eco-Welfare
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.