Power relations in the management of the Sisik Naga Hills forest from a political ecology perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jscsr.v3i2.2026.2457Keywords:
forestry bureaucracy, political ecology, Forest Village Community Institutions, social forestry, power relationsAbstract
Background: Forest governance in Indonesia faces a fundamental paradox. 95.5 million hectares of forest are claimed as critical conservation assets, yet 70% of the area is managed through centralized institutions. This situation tends to marginalize local communities. This study examines power relations in state forest management in the Sisik Naga Hills, Purbalingga, Central Java. Forest management in this area is formally participatory, but upon closer examination, it harbors structural inequalities. This study aims to analyze the power mechanisms operating through the Forest Village Community Institution (LMDH) and explore the ecological consequences of exclusionary management practices. Methods: This qualitative research uses a desk study method. Political ecology is used as the research framework. Data include policy documents, academic publications, and institutional reports related to social forestry and state forest governance. Thematic analysis was conducted to map forest ownership structures, local institutional dynamics, and exclusionary mechanisms in decision-making. Findings: The results found that the conversion of protected forests into cardamom plantations in Karangmoncol resulted in an escalation of disasters and material losses. The ambiguity of zoning boundaries and the dominance of local elites create blind spots that exclude community ecological knowledge. Conclusion: This study concludes that the absence of explicit conflict is not an indicator of balance, but rather a product of power relations that have been naturalized through formal procedures. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study extends the political ecology literature by showing that power does not always operate through open conflict, but rather through bureaucratic mechanisms that appear neutral but systematically benefit dominant actors in areas that have been marginalized in national forestry discourse.
References
Aljunied, S.A. (2025). Forest Governance in Indonesia. In: State Rescaling and Global Political Economy in Southeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan.
Arauf, M. (2021). Konsep Pengelolaan Hutan Adat di Indonesia: Sebuah Kasus Di Bengkalis, Indonesia. Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan, 9(1), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.33884/jck.v9i1.3724
Adams, C., Moglia, M., & Frantzeskaki, N. 2024. Design Principles for Mainstreaming of Nature Based Solutions in Cities: A Proposal for Future Pathways. Nature-Based Solutions, 6, 100 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100155
ANTARA News. (2025). Kemenhut: Luas hutan RI 95,5 juta ha & angka deforestasi 175,4 ribu ha. Antara News.
Budi, B., Kartodihardjo, H., Nugroho, B., & Mardiana, R. (2021). Implementation of Social Forestry Policy: A Review of Community Access. Forest and Society, 5(1), 148-163. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i1.9859
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dewi, I. G. S., Silviana, A., Adhim, N., & Novana, M. (2021). Protected forest function change policy for food estate land in Subang, Indonesia. Journal Environment Management Tourism, 12(7), 1893-1898. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v12.7(55).14
Fisher, M.R., Dhiaulhaq, A., & Sahide, M.A.K. (2019). The politics, economies, and ecologies of Indonesia's third generation of social forestry: An introduction to the special section. Forest and Society, 3(2), 152-170. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6348
François, M., de Aguiar Jr, T. R., Mielke, M. S., Rousseau, A. N., Faria, D., & Mariano-Neto, E. (2024). Interactions Between Forest Cover and Watershed Hydrology: A Conceptual Meta-Analysis. Water, 16(23), 3350. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16233350
Gabrys, J., Westerlaken, M., Urzedo, D., Ritts, M., & Simlai, T. (2022). Reworking the political in digital forests: The cosmopolitics of socio-technical worlds. Progress in Environmental Geography, 1(1-4), 58-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/27539687221117836
Gay, E. T., Martin, K. L., & Caldwell, P. V. (2025). Projected land use changes will cause water quality degradation at drinking water intakes across a regional watershed. PLOS Water, 4(4), e0000313. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12693
Herrmann-Pillath, C., Sarkki, S., Maran, T., Soini, K., & Hiedanpää, J. 2023. Nature-Based Solutions as More-Than-Human Art: Co-Evolutionary and Co-Creative Design Approaches. Nature Based Solutions, 4, 100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100081
Khan, M.F.A., Rahman, M.S., Maryudi, A., Schusser, C., & Giessen, L. (2024). Revealing the Multilevel Actors Power Network in Mangrove Forest Governance-Insights from the Sundarbans, Bangladesh. Forest and Society, 8(2), 464-489. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v8i2.32924
Maryudi, A., Sahide, M.A.K., Daulay, M.H., Yuniati, D., Syafitri, W., Sadiyo, S., & Fisher, M.R. (2022). Holding social forestry hostage in Indonesia: Contested bureaucracy mandates and potential escape pathways. Environmental Science & Policy, 128, 194-207.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.013
Moeliono, M., Sahide, M. A. K., Bong, I. W., & Dwisatrio, B. (2023). Social forestry in Indonesia: Fragmented values, progress, contradictions, and opportunities. In Nikolakis W., & Moura da Veiga R. (Eds.), Social value, climate change and environmental stewardship: Insights from theory and practice (pp. 117-138). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23145-2_8
Muttaqin, T., Soraya, E., Dharmawan, B., Laraswati, D., & Maryudi, A. (2023). Asymmetric power relations in multistakeholder initiatives: Insights from the government-instituted Indonesian National Forestry Council. Trees, Forests and People, 12, 100406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2023.100406
Maring, P. (2022). Conflict transformation and collaboration in developing social forestry in Flores, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 6(1), 40-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v6i1.13199
Rodd, Fisher, M., Monterroso, I., Liswanti, N., Maryudi, A., Larson, A.M., Mwangi, E., & Herawati, T. (2022). Coordinating forest tenure reform: Objectives, resources and relations in Indonesia, Kenya, Nepal, Peru, and Uganda. Forest Policy and Economics, 139, 102718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102718
Nurprabowo, A., Awang, S.A., Hardwinarto, S., Dharmawan, B., Daulay, M.H., & Maryudi, A. (2021). Poor science meets political neglect: Land use changes of high conservation value forests in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 5(2), 389-408. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.13451
Noulèkoun, F., Mensah, S., Kim, H., Houndonougbo, J. S. H., Mensah, M., Lee, W. K., ... & Khamzina, A. (2025). Contrasting ecological mechanisms mediate the impact of land conversion on ecosystem multifunctionality. Functional Ecology, 39(3), 783-798. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14738
Robbins, P. (2019). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Ramadhan, R., Syah, D. F., & Waskhito, N. T. (2022). Effectiveness and Institutional Conditions in Social Forestry Program: Case Study of Forest Village Community Institution (LMDH) Sumber Makmur, Forest Management Unit (KPH) Malang. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 10(1), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v10i1.525
Sahide, M.A.K., Fisher, M.R., Sirimorok, N., Faturachmat, F., Dhiaulhaq, A., Maryudi, A., & Batiran, K.B. (2023). Blind spots and spotlights in bureaucratic politics: An analysis of policy co-production in environmental governance dynamics in Indonesia. Development Policy Review, 41(5), e12693. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12693
Weiskopf, S. R., Myers, B. J., Arce-Plata, M. I., Blanchard, J. L., Ferrier, S., Fulton, E. A., ... & Rosa, I. M. (2022). A conceptual framework to integrate biodiversity, ecosystem function, and ecosystem service models. BioScience, 72(11), 1062-1073. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac074
Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A., Smith, A., & Turner, B. (2020). Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 375(1794), 20190120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120
Parker, D., Tosiani, A., Yazid, M., Sari, I. L., Kartika, T., Kustiyo, & Hansen, M. C. (2024). Land in limbo: Nearly one third of Indonesia’s cleared old-growth forests left idle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(28), e2318029121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2318029121
Peluso, N. L., & Ribot, J. (2020). Postscript: A theory of access revisited. Society & Natural Resources, 33(2), 300-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1709929
Pang, Z., Zhang, Y., Han, S., Wang, E., & Chen, X. (2024). Effects of root architecture on uprooting properties between deciduous and evergreen species with different growth habits. Forests, 15(4), 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15040585
Zhu, H., Zhu, X., Xu, Q., Fu, X., Li, M., Jia, X., & Fan, Z. (2025). From hazard mapping to risk governance: 20-year trajectory of land use/cover change impacts on landslide susceptibility via multi-modal scientometrics. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05831-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Isna Hanny Puspitaningtyas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
