Bridging theory and grassroots insight: Assessing the capacity of local communities in evaluating cultural heritage significance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jscsr.v3i2.2026.2437Keywords:
criteria development, cultural heritage significance value, Kotagede Yogyakarta, local community assessment, multi-aspectAbstract
Background: The city of Yogyakarta as a special area that has a high historical value and a wealth of historical heritage is deemed necessary to pay more attention to these things. Moreover, the rapid development and massive development that is currently happening can threaten the sustainability of the existing cultural heritage areas. One of the Cultural Conservation Areas that may be threatened is the Kotagede area as a witness to the history of the glory of the Islamic Mataram Kingdom and the forerunner of the formation of the city of Yogyakarta. This area is currently and will continue to undergo several changes. The local community as one of the stakeholders has a very important role in harmonizing the changes that occur. Research to see the extent to which the assessment of the significance of cultural heritage both theoretically and through local community criteria becomes very significant to be carried out. Methods: This study uses a deductive-mix method approach and statistical analysis uses a Likert-scaled technique. The unit of observation of this study includes 6 objects of cultural heritage found in the Kotagede Cultural Heritage Area, namely Kotagede Market, Mataram Gedhe Mosque, Tomb Complex of the Founders of the Kingdom & Sendang Seliran, Kampung Alun-Alun (“Between Two Gates”), Kedhaton, and Ruins. Cepuri Fort. The analysis was carried out in three stages. The first stage is to assess the significance of cultural heritage based on literacy studies and secondary data. The second stage is to assess the significance of cultural heritage by involving the role of local communities through the development of criteria. The next stage is to analyze the significance of each proposed criterion based on public perception. Findings: Summarize the main findings, including specific effect sizes and their statistical significance, if possible. The result of this research is that all research objects have important significance values, where there is only a slight difference between the assessment based on literature study and based on public perception. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study highlights that all cultural heritage sites in the Kotagede area hold significant value, with only minor differences between theoretical assessments and local community perceptions. It also emphasizes that local communities possess comparable capacity and insight to other stakeholders in evaluating the significance of cultural heritage. Novelty/Originality of this article: Another finding from this study is that local communities also have the same capacity and capability as other stakeholders to assess the significance of cultural heritage.
References
Aurelia, S. (2020). Penerapan World Heritage Cities pada Kota Tua Jakarta. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Albiladiyah, I., & Suratmin. (1997). Kotagede dan Dinamika Sejarahnya. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Studi Jawa.
Balai Pelestarian Cagar Budaya Provinsi DIY. (2017). Benteng Cepuri Kotagede. Retrieved from Situs Web Balai Pelestarian Cagar Budaya Provinsi. Balai Pelestarian Cagar Budaya Provinsi DIY. http://kebudayaan.kemdikbud.go.id/bpcbyogyakarta/benteng-cepuri-kotagede/
Banda, L. O. L., Banda, C. V., Banda, J. T., & Singini, T. (2024). Preserving cultural heritage: A community-centric approach to safeguarding the Khulubvi Traditional Temple, Malawi. Heliyon, 10(18), e37610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37610
Destiadi, R. (2020). Kampung Alun-Alun (Between Two Gates) Identitas Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Kotagede. POLIMEDIA, 23(3)1. https://ojs.polmed.ac.id/index.php/polimedia/article/view/355/89
Dharmasanti, R., & Dewi, S. P. (2020). The awareness level of building owners to conserve cultural heritage area in Kotagede, Yogyakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 409, 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/409/1/012025
Fajri, C. (2016). Dinamika Komunikasi Organisasi Forum Joglo (Studi Kasus Dinamika Komunikasi Internal dan Eksternal Organisasi Forum Joglo Kotagede Yogyakarta). Kom & Realitas Sosial, 12(12), 41-52. https://jurnal.ubl.ac.id/index.php/JIK/article/view/654/629
Feng, H., Li, X., Chen, J., Xu, B., Zhou, X., & Zhu, R. (2025). Value identification of celebrities’ former residences: An exploration using cultural triad theory and the contingent valuation method. Buildings, 15(21), 3940. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15213940
Fitri, I. (2015). Partisipasi Masyarakat Lokal Medan: Sebuah Tinjauan Atas Kriteria Nasional Pada Proses Penetapan Sebagai Cagar Budaya. Berkala Arkeologi SANGKHAKALA, 18(2), 110-127. http://sangkhakala.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/SBA/article/view/12
Fitri, I., Marisa, A., & Sitorus, R. (2020). Understanding the Historic Center of Merdeka-Kesawan: Heritage Significance Assessment in Planning and Development Context. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/452/1/012048
Hakim, M. F. (2018). Pelestarian Kotagede sebagai Pusat Pariwisata Heritage Kota Tua di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Khasanah Ilmu, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.31294/khi.v9i1.2805
Hanunnindya, R. P. (2016). Revitalisasi Pasar Kotagede: Optimalisasi Kebutuhan Ruang Pasar dan Pengembangan Fungsi Pasar yang. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Heriawan, R. (2004). Peranan dan Dampak Pariwisata pada Perekonomian Indonesia: Suatu Pendekatan Model I-O dan SAM. Doktoral Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Junianto. (2019). Konsep Mancapat-Mancalima dalam Struktur Kota Kerajaan Mataram Islam: Periode Kerajaan Surakarta. MINTAKAT-Jurnal Arsitektur, 107-131. https://doi.org/10.26905/mj.v20i2.3987
Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2007). Kompleks Masjid Gedhe Mataram di Kotagede. Sistem Registrasi Nasional Cagar Budaya. http://cagarbudaya.kemdikbud.go.id/cagarbudaya/detail/PO2016040400002/kompleks-masjid-gede-mataram-di-kotagede
Kusuma, A. (2020). Kajian Makna Saka Guru di Masjid Gedhe Mataram Kotagede Yogyakarta (Sebuah Tinjauan Arsitektur). Lintas Ruang: Jurnal Pengetahuan & Perancangan Desain Interior, 8(2), 1-10. https://journal.isi.ac.id/index.php/lintas/article/download/5198/2105
Larasati, T. A. (2013). Watu Gilang dan Watu Gatheng. Dinas Perpustakaan dan Arsip Daerah DIY.
Leiper, N. (1995). Tourism Management. RMIT.
Makkelo, I. D. (2017). Sejarah Perkotaan: Sebuah Tinjauan Historiografis dan Tematis. Lensa Budaya, 83-101. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jlb/article/view/3052
Muftiadi, M., Hasan, M., Dewi, C., & Irwansyah, M. (2025). Preserving the past: Analyzing structural damage, policy implementation, and conservation efforts for 19th-century heritage buildings in Peunayong, Aceh. Sustainability, 17(19), 8594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198594
Mundher, R., Abu Bakar, S., Maulan, S., Mohd Yusof, M. J., Al-Sharaa, A., Aziz, A., & Gao, H. (2022). Aesthetic quality assessment of landscapes as a model for urban forest areas: A systematic literature review. Forests, 13(7), 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13070991
Nasruddin, E., Rosilawati, Y., Bustami, M. R., & Mulawarman, K. (2019). Culture heritage and local community engagement: Analyses of Kotagede and George Town heritage sites. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(5), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i5.1075
Paramitha, I. A., Kastawan, I. W., & Widiastuti. (2017). Nilai SIgnifikansi Cagar Budaya Hotel Inna Bali, Jalan Veteran, Denpasar. RUANG: Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan (SPACE: Journal of the Built Environment), 113-128. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ruang/article/view/39667/24055
Pontoh, N. K., & Kustiwan, I. (2009). Pengantar Perencanaan Perkotaan. Penerbit ITB.
Pramesti, N. A. (2019). Guide Book Nilai-Nilai Religius Ornamen Masjid Gedhe Mataram Kotagede. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Sugiyono. (2010). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Suryanti, E., Sumartono, S., & Hermawan, H. (2014). Culture development planning in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (Management planning of cultural heritage in Kotagede District based on community empowerment conservation model). Journal of Indonesian Tourism and Development Studies, 2(3), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jitode.2014.002.03.05
Yusuf, D. M. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitaif & Penelitian Gabungan. Prenada Media.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muti’ah Rihul Jannah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.














