Unraveling hegemony digital: A framework CDA-semiotic framework for sustainable social epistemic justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jscsr.v3i1.2025.2154Keywords:
organized ignorance, digital hegemony, socio-cultural sustainabilityAbstract
Background: In an increasingly digitized world, religion and culture have transcended their traditional roles. They are now instruments of hegemony that shape—and often destroy—our collective perception of social sustainability. This research examines how digital media platforms, through algorithms and "echo chambers", perpetuate such "organized ignorance", a systemic erosion of critical thinking caused by structural pressures and ideological manipulation. This research is rooted in the philosophical principle of Enlightenment (Kant: "Sapere Aude") and the critique of epistemic passivity (Bonhoeffer, Nietzsche). The core argument is that digital ecosystems paradoxically democratize knowledge while simultaneously reinforcing cognitive conformity and threatening socio-cultural resilience. Method: Using a qualitative design, this study applies Teun van Dijk's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Saussurean semiotics to deconstruct power-laden narratives in religious-cultural content on platforms such as YouTube. Primary data are taken from one of Ardhianzy’s videos on collective ignorance, and secondary metadata illustrate how algorithms reduce complex symbols (e.g., Kantian Enlightenment, Luther’s Reformation) into binary myths. This process legitimizes polarization and perpetuates epistemic injustice. Findings: The findings confirm the symbiotic role of algorithmic personalization and capitalist platforms in commercializing Enlightenment rhetoric. This fuels banality malorum (Arendt) through the normalization of misinformation and affective polarization. The research also identifies historical hegemonic mechanisms—such as colonial "enlightenment" missions and Nazi propaganda—that resurface in the digital context. This is reflected in Indonesia’s socio-political fragmentation, manifested through coordinated disinformation campaigns. Conclusion: This research recommends the integration of "algorithmic literacy" into SDG-based education, enhanced regulatory transparency (e.g., the EU Digital Services Act), and the development of virtue ethics-based platforms to restore intellectual autonomy. By synthesizing CDA, semiotics, and moral philosophy, the study maps hidden power structures in digital narratives and proposes actionable strategies. Novelty/Originality of this Article: This methodological synthesis of CDA, semiotics, and moral philosophy represents a novelty not present in previous unidisciplinary studies. Theoretically, this research bridges Kantian Enlightenment with contemporary critiques of digital hegemony.
References
Ajemba, M. N., & Arene, E. C. (2022). Research Gaps for Future Research and Their Identification. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 16(1), 575–579.
Alwaheidi, S. (2024). Between Legitimizing And Criminalizing Bombing Civilians During Wars: A Critical Discourse Analysis Of Western And Eastern Media. Eurasian Journal of Media Communication and Culture Studies, 2(2), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.69999/emedia.1583871
Ardhianzy. (2025). Inilah BAHAYA Meng*rikan Dari Orang BODOH! Lebih Meng*rikan Dari Orang Jahat! Youtube. https://youtu.be/cyQ0IAtIwD4?si=X70a3jsX6wgcGI6l
Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. The Viking Press.
Baihaqi, M. (2019). Legitimasi Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) dalam Kontestasi Islam Politik Mutakhir. AL MA’ARIEF : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Budaya, 1(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.35905/almaarief.v1i2.1046
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. The Noonday Press.
Binns, R. (2018). Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason. Philosophy and Technology, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5
Bisa, K. (2022). Kenapa Sih Orang ‘Bodoh’ Sering Sok Pintar? Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/IKesFhulkGM
Blakeslee, S. (2004). The CRAAP Test. LOEX Q, 31(4). https://commons.emich.edu/loexquarterly/vol31/iss3/4
Campbell, M. E. (2000). Thinking outside the (Black) box. Brain and Language, 71(1), 93–95. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2222
Capano, G., Galanti, M. T., & Barbato, G. (2023). When the political leader is the narrator: the political and policy dimensions of narratives. In Policy Sciences (Vol. 56, Nomor 2). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-023-09505-6
Cernicova-Buca, M., & Ciurel, D. (2022). Developing Resilience to Disinformation: A Game-Based Method for Future Communicators. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095438
Chin, R. (2025). Lebih Parah Orang Bodoh Yang Ga Sadar Dia Bodoh. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/S7l71oCV-ew
Czakó, I. (2019). Appropriation and Polemics: Karl Jaspers’ Criticism of Kierkegaard’s Concept of Religion. In Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures (Vol. 31). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22632-9_11
Danaditya, A., Ng, L. H. X., & Carley, K. M. (2022). From curious hashtags to polarized effect: profiling coordinated actions in indonesian twitter discourse. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 12(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00936-2
Dave, K., Rao, S., Rajasri, P. N., & Garg, A. (2024). Decoding The Covert Messages in Advertising: A Semiotics Case Study of Navi Mumbai. European Economic Letters (EEL), 14(1), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.52783/eel.v14i1.1057
Denisenko, V. (2022). Disinformation Analysis and Citizen Activism in the “Post-Truth” Era: The Case of DebunkEU.org. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99987-2_9
Dijk, T. A. Van. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
Dwiyanti, D. A., Nurani, I., Alfarizi, M. N., & Hubbah, R. D. (2023). Pengaruh Media Sosial terhadap Partisipasi Politik Warga Negara: Dampak Positif dan Negatif. Advances In Social Humanities Research, 1(4), 298–306. https://www.adshr.org/index.php/vo/article/view/34
Farina, M., Zhdanov, P., Karimov, A., & Lavazza, A. (2024). AI and society: a virtue ethics approach. AI & SOCIETY, 39(3), 1127–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01545-5
Galanton, D. (2019). The Manipulation Through Media, From Concept To Practical Application. International Journal of Communication Research, 9(1), 17–22.
Gómez, J. M. (2017). Mythologies. Macat Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781912281695
Guess, A. M., & Lyons, B. A. (2020). Misinformation, disinformation, and online propaganda. In Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108890960.003
HAM, K. (2016). Tujuan 16: Mempromosikan masyarakat yang damai dan inklusif demi pembangunan berkelanjutan, menyediakan akses keadilan bagi semua dan membangun lembaga yang efektif, akuntabel dan inklusif di seluruh tingkatan. Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia, 1–9.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? - A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Harum, D. M. (2017). Representasi Kolonialisme Dalam Tjerita Nji Paina Karya H. Kommer. Aksara, 29(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.29255/aksara.v29i2.72.155-169
Hasbullah, M., & Maella, N. F. S. (2025). Online Media Construction in Reporting Rompi Putra Mulyono on detikcom and sindonews.com. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research, 3(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.69693/ijim.v3i1.278
Hasnaa, A. Y., & Alfian, M. F. (2023). Isu Rasisme dalam Hubungan Internasional: Narasi “Asian Hate” dan Mispersepsi Amerika Serikat terhadap China di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Ejournal3.Undip.Ac.Id, 9(1), 226–248. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jihi/article/view/37381
Hobbs, R. (2021). “A most mischievous word”: Neil Postman’s approach to propaganda education. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-65
Hug, T. (2006). Microlearning : A New Pedagogical Challenge (hal. 7–11).
Indrapangastuti, D. (2023). Berpikir kritis melalui problem based learning (teori dan implementasi). CV Pajang Putra Wijaya.
Lagua, L., Jeannethe, V., Ruiz, V., & Carolina, E. (2025). Exploración semiótica y religiosa en “Sonidos de Libertad: Un Análisis Profundo.” Arandu UTIC, 11(2), 3792–3808. https://doi.org/10.69639/arandu.v11i2.538
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175–1195. https://doi.org/10.5465/256809
Nisa, P. K., Hana, M., Azzahra, S. M., Bintang, M., Zarkasyi, J. M. A., & M, A. A. (2024). Peran Aplikasi Tiktok Dalam Transformasi Perilaku Mahasiswa. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 2(5), 145–157.
Peersman, G. (2014). Overview: Data Collection and Analysis Methods in Impact Evaluation. Methodological Briefs: Impact Evaluation, 10.
Postman, N. (1974). The Ecology of Learning. The English Journal, 63(4), 58. https://doi.org/10.2307/813650
Qie, Y. (2024). “The Banality of Evil” and Modern Education. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 32, 185–189. https://doi.org/10.54097/5jj00970
Ranaweera, C., & Prabhu, J. (2003). On the relative importance of customer satisfaction and trust as determinants of customer retention and positive word of mouth. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 12(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740100
Rodilosso, E. (2024). Filter Bubbles and the Unfeeling: How AI for Social Media Can Foster Extremism and Polarization. Philosophy and Technology, 37(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00758-4
Sahlberg, P. (2014). Finnish Lessons: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland. Teachers College Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=py7r-7Lz-w4C
Sakamoto, J. (2023). Reconsidering the Possibilities of Digital Citizenship and Pedagogy: Beyond the “Post-Truth” Dystopia. Educational Studies in Japan, 17(0), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.17.97
Saumantri, T. (2023). Hyper Religiusitas di Era Digital: Analisis Paradigma Postmodernisme Jean Baudrillard Terhadap Fenomena Keberagamaan di Media Sosial. Al-Mutharahah: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 20(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.46781/al-mutharahah.v20i1.646
Saussure, F. de. (1959). Course in General Linguistics. Philosophical Library. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=MCdZAAAAMAAJ
Silva, D., & Guzzardi, C. C. (2023). Os Perigos Da Obediência: Diálogo Entre Hannah Arendt E Stanley Milgram. Revista Foco, 16(5), e1898. https://doi.org/10.54751/revistafoco.v16n5-084
Siswadi, G. A. (2024). Filsafat Manusia: Memahami Manusia Sebagai Homo Complexus. PT. Mafy Media Literasi Indonesia.
UNESCO. (2020). Seoul Declaration on Media and Information Literacy for Everyone and by Everyone: A Defence against Disinfodemics. Institutions Strong Literacy Information Feature Week Forum Agenda.
Wang, H. (2022). Transparency as Manipulation? Uncovering the Disciplinary Power of Algorithmic Transparency. Philosophy and Technology, 35(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00564-w
Webber, J. (2018). What Is Existentialism? (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198735908.003.0001
Xenikou, A., & Simosi, M. (2006). Organizational culture and transformational leadership as predictors of business unit performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610684409
Zerilli, J., Knott, A., Maclaurin, J., & Gavaghan, C. (2019). Transparency in Algorithmic and Human Decision-Making: Is There a Double Standard? Philosophy and Technology, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0330-6
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohamad Nurul Anam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.