Learning pedestrian’s perspective towards sidewalk through new urbanism

Authors

  • Veronica Mandasari Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/jpstd.v1i2.2024.488

Keywords:

importance performance analysis, new urbanism, pedestrian perspective, sidewalk

Abstract

In the 1990s, several urban and environmental designers discussed various issues related to suburban expansion, including income disparities, environmental degradation, and rampant use of motorized vehicles. The New Urbanism movement became known in the 1970s and 1980s in America. The principles of New Urbanism are clearly illustrated in the book Charter of the New Urbanism (Leccese & McCormick, 2000). The nature of being friendly to pedestrians is one form/pattern of the theory of New Urbanism. New Urbanism is also known as neotraditional design, transit-oriented development, and traditional or neighborhood development (TND). The analysis technique used for this goal is IPA (Important Performance Analysis). Before conducting the analysis process, it is necessary to test the validity and reliability and the Wilcoxon test of the variables used. The study focuses on the Tunjungan area in Surabaya City, an essential element of accessibility for trade and service areas. A pedestrian network is necessary for safe and comfortable mobility, as mandated by the Regulation of the Minister of Public Works. TOD nodes were created to connect public and private transportation and link neighborhoods and districts through corridors. These corridors are essential in developing New Urbanism theory, which recommends corridors with mixed land use patterns to create a compatible environment and protect public security, health, and safety. Community participation is necessary to develop regulations related to corridors.

References

Carr, Stephen. 1992. Public Space: Environment and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Fruin, J. (1971). Pedestrian Planning and Design. New York: Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners, Inc.

Halim, D K. 2008. Psikologi Lingkungan Perkotaan. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta

Hendrayan et al,. 2013. Analisis Pelayanan Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki. Jurnal Ilmiah Elektronik Infrastruktur Teknik Sipil. Volume 2

Heryanto, Bambang. 2011. Roh dan Citra Kota. Brilian Internasional. Surabaya

Kerridge, J., Hine, J., & Wigan, M. (2001). Agent-based modelling of pedestrian movements: The questions that need to be asked and answered. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(3), 327-341.

Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introdusction to its Methodology. Sage

Leccese, Michael, Kathleen, McCormick. 2000. Charter of The New Urbanism. McGraw-Hill, Inc. Pennysylvania

Lenakoly, Steven. 2007. Penilaian 20 Kota, Pedestrian Surabaya Rangking Satu. http://news.detik.com/read/2007/09/03/100707/824728/466/penilaian-20-kota-pedestrian-surabaya-rangking-satu?nd771104bcj. Diakses 3 April 2014

Lockyer, Nick. 2008. Quantitative Surface Analysis of a Binary Drug Mixture. Survey Analysis Research Center

Lynch, Kevin. 1960. The Image of The City. MIT Press. Cambridge

Margono,S. 1995. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan, Cet.7. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2007. Mardalis, Metode Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Jakarta: Bumi aksara.

Martilla, J. and James J. 1977. Importance- Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 14 (January): pp. 77-79.

Nasional, Direktorat Perkotaan, Tata Ruang dan Pertanahan, Bappenas

Nicholson, Geoff. 2009. Lost Art of Walking. Riverhade Trade. USA

Oug, Johan. 2014. Analisis Kepuasan Pelanggan dengan Importance Performance Analysis di SBU Laboratory Cibitung PT Sucofindo (Persero). J@TI Undip. Vol 9. No. 1

Patton, Michael. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications. Saint Paul, MN

Pedoman Perencanaan, Penyediaan, dan Pemanfaatan Prasarana dan Sarana Jaringan Pejalan Kaki di Kawasan Perkotaan. 2014. Direktorat Jenderal Penataan Ruang Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum

Pradono, Julianty at al. 2005. Health Transision in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekologi Kesehatan (2) 3

Puskarev & Zupan. 1975. Urban Space for Pedestrian. The MIT Press. Cambridge

Sevilla, Consuelo et, Al. 1993. Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Shirvani, Hamid. 1985. The Urban Design Process. Michigan: Van Nostrand Reinhold

Slovin, Husein Umar. 2000. Riset Pemasaran dan Perilaku Konsumen Cetakan Ketiga. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Sodik, Abdul. 2003. Organisasi: Perilaku, Struktur, Proses. Terjemahan Nunuk Andriani. Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara

Southworth, Michael. 2005. Designing the Walkable City. Journal of Urban Planning and Development:4(246)

Speck, Jeff. 2012. Walkable City: How Downtown Can Save America, One Step at a Time. Farrar

Suarasurabaya. 2012. Trem dan Monorel Mulai Pembangunan Fisik 2014. http://kelanakota.suarasurabaya.net/news/2012/108022-Trem-dan-Monorel-Mulai Pembangunan-Fisik-2014. Diakses 19 Maret 2014

Sugiyono. 2009. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta Surabaya.go.id. 2014. World Bank Apresiasi Persiapan Pembangunan AMC. http://www.surabaya.go.id/berita/index.php?Page_page=9&&tot_Hasil=2452&selSortBy=&txtsearch=&act=. Diakses 19 Maret 2014

Trancik, Roger. 1986. Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold

Transportation Research Board. 1985. Highway Capacity Manual

UU No 26 Tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang. 2007. Sekretariat Badan Koordinasi Tata Ruang

Wigananda, Muhlas et al. 2012. Analisis Kinerja Jalur Pedestrian di Kota Surabaya (Studi Kasus: Jl. Pemuda). Jurnal Teknik ITS:1

Zahnd, Marcus. 1999. Perancangan Kota Secara Terpadu: Teori Perancangan Kota dan Penerapannya. Semarang: Kanisius

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

Mandasari, V. (2024). Learning pedestrian’s perspective towards sidewalk through new urbanism. Journal of Placemaking and Streetscape Design, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.61511/jpstd.v1i2.2024.488

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check