Mainstreaming biophilic design in residential development in Jakarta: a study with a multi-level perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jpstd.v1i1.2023.254Keywords:
biophilic, design, perspectiveAbstract
In the UN's sustainable development program (Sustainable et al. for 2030), it is determined that sustainable cities and communities are one of the goals for achieving in 2030, namely goal no 11. By 2050, the world's urban population will double, making urbanization the most transformative change of the 21st century (UN-Habitat, 2017). It is undeniable that a big city like Jakarta is a city with a high population density. Human life in urban areas increasingly reduces human opportunities to interact with the natural environment, which decreases a person's general well-being (Feandri, 2016). The research will be carried out on reorganizing the city by involving natural elements through a Biophilic Design theoretical approach, a theory that utilizes human nature to be happy to be close to nature (Browning et al., 2014). This theory is claimed to improve its inhabitants' mental and physical health and direct people to take care of the environment on a larger scale.
References
Abdoellah, O.S. 2017. Ekologi manusia dan pembangunan berkelanjutan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Asyary, A., & Veruswati, M. (2020). Sunlight exposure increased Covid-19 recovery rates: A study in the central pandemic area of Indonesia. Science of the Total Environment. 729, 139016.
Atria, N.F. & Achmad, S. (2014). Strategi komunikasi visual kegiatan window farming sebagai alternatif berkebun lahan sempit dada hunian vertikal. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 13(3), 221-227.
Beatley, T., & Newman, P. (2013). Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainability. 5(8), 3328-3345.
Browning, W., Ryan, C., & Clancy, J. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design: Improving Health & Well-Being in the Built Environment. Terrapin Bright Green, LLC, 1–60.
Bruntland, & Harlem, G. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future . Ching, F.D.K. & Eckler, J.F. (2013). Introduction to architecture. New Jersey: John Willey and sons
Feandri, A.(2016). Kajian Dampak Biophilic-Design Pada Hunian. Tesis Aldo Feandri 1406506446 Fakultas Teknik Program Studi Ilmu Arsitektur Depok Juli 2016.
Felly, R., & Susanto, D. (2020). The changing effects through biophilic design in increasing elderly memory capacity. Case study: Sasana Tresna Werdha Yayasan Karya Bakti Ria Pembangunan, Cibubur. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 452(1).
Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective. Theory, Culture & Society. 31(5), 21-40.
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy. 36(3), 399-417).
Gillis, K., & Gatersleben, B. (2015). A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. Buildings. 5(3), 948-963.
Gray, T., & Birrell, C. (2014). Are biophilic-designed site office buildings linked to health benefits and high performing occupants? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 11(12), 12204-12222.
Hoare, E., Felice, J., & Michael, B. (2019). The impact of urbanization on mood disorders: an update of recent evidence. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 32(3), 198-203.
Kaffah, M,F., Firzal, Y., & Susilawaty, M, D. (2020). Penerapan prinsip biophilic design pada perancangan apartemen SOHO di kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Arsitektur ALUR, 3(1)
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
Kellert, S.R. & Wilson, E.O. (1993). The biophylia hypothesis. Washington DC: Island Press.
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Peri-urban. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/peri-urban, 09 Januari 2021, pk. 21.50 WIB
Okkels, N., Kristiansen, C.B., Munk‐Jørgensen, P., & Sartorius, N. (2018). Urban mental health: challenges and perspectives. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 31(3), 258-264.
Papachristos, G., Sofianos, A., & Adamides, E. (2013). System interactions in socio-technical transitions: Extending the multi-level perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 7, 53-59.
Peraturan Gubernur Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta Nomor 38 Tahun 2012 Tentang Bangunan Gedung Hijau
Rosyani. (2019). Ekologi manusia. Jakarta : Universitas Indonesia Publishing.
Revell, G. & Anda, M. (2014). Sustainable Urban biophilia: The case of greenskins for urban density. Sustainability, 6. 5423-5438.
Söderlund, J. & Newman, P. (2017). Improving mental health in prisons through biophilic design. The Prison Journal, 97(6), 750-772.
UN-Habitat. (2012). State of the World's Cities 2012/2013: Prosperity of City. Nairobi, Kenya: UN-Habitat.
UN-Habitat. (2017). Agenda baru perkotaan : deklarasi Quito mengenai perkotaan dan permukiman berkelanjutan untuk semua . Quito, Equador : UN-Habitat
Wilson, E.O. (1986). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Winarso, H., Hudalah, D., & Firman, T. (2015). Peri-urban transformation in the Jakarta metropolitan area. Habitat International 49 221-229
World Health Organization. (2020). Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Xue, F., Gou, Z., Lau, S.S-Y., Lau, S-K., Chung, K-H., & Zhang, J. (2019). From biophilic design to biophilic urbanism: Stakeholders perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211(1), 1444-1452
Zelenski, J. M., & Nisbet, E. K. (2014). Happiness and Feeling Connected: The Distinct Role of Nature Relatedness. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 3–23.
Zhang, L.,Tan P.Y., & Diehl, J.A. (2017). A conceptual framework for studying urban green spaces effects on health. Journal of Urban Ecology. (1)1-13.
