Energy-positive green space: Designing carbon-neutral community architecture in edge environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jpstd.v3i2.2026.2451Keywords:
carbon-neutral architecture, community green space, participatory co-design, placemaking, urban edge environmentsAbstract
Background: Urban edge zones—the transitional areas between dense urban cores and peri-urban landscapes—often face rapid development pressure, environmental vulnerability, and uneven access to public space. Although energy-positive and carbon-neutral design strategies are increasingly discussed, their integration with participatory placemaking remains underexamined, particularly at community scale in edge contexts. Methods: This study adopts a qualitative design-research case study in Amsterdam Noord, combining site-based environmental observation (e.g., solar exposure, wind behavior, vegetation, and use patterns) with iterative participatory co-design workshops. The architectural proposal was developed through low-tech, human-centered methods, emphasizing passive design optimization, low-embodied-carbon material strategies, and on-site renewable energy integration. Findings: Community input consistently prioritized shaded gathering areas, accessible green space, edible gardens, ecological pathways, and flexible multipurpose zones, which directly shaped spatial organization and environmental strategies. The proposed community green structure achieved a projected 12% operational energy surplus through integrated passive measures and photovoltaic-based generation. Survey findings further indicated high satisfaction with the co-design process, strong recognition of environmental friendliness, increased sustainability awareness, and broad support for applying similar participatory approaches in future projects. Conclusion: This study suggest that energy-positive, carbon-neutral community architecture can be effectively developed in urban edge environments when environmental logic is embedded within participatory, context-sensitive placemaking. This integrated approach supports both measurable environmental performance and social outcomes such as ownership, trust, and long-term stewardship. Novelty/Originality of this article: This research contributes a replicable participatory design model for energy-positive green-space architecture tailored to urban edge conditions, demonstrating how technical sustainability goals can be advanced together with community-led placemaking outcomes.
References
Architecture 2030. (2023). Climate positive design: The built environment and climate targets. https://www.architecture2030.org
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Poor, J. A., Goh, Y. W., & Thorpe, D. (2021). A human-centric participatory approach to energy-efficient housing based on occupants' collaborative image. Open House International, 46(4), 615-635. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-11-2020-0163
Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary public space: Critique and classification, part one: Critique. Journal of Urban Design, 15(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800903435651
Chan, W. F., & Diehl, J. A. (2025). Investigating participatory design and community attachment: a case study of Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 18(2), 260-279.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2022.2120527
Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and urban planning, 68(1), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.
Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge.
Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Haase, D., Larondelle, N., Andersson, E., Artmann, M., Borgström, S., Breuste, J., ... & Elmqvist, T. (2014). A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio, 43(4), 413-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan Press.
IEA. (2023). Positive energy buildings. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/positive-energy-buildings
IEA. (2025). Buildings: Energy efficiency 2025. International Energy Agency.
https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-2025/buildings
IPCC. (2022). AR6 Working Group III: Mitigation of climate change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/
Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., Pauleit, S., Naumann, S., Davis, M., Artmann, M., ... & Bonn, A. (2016). Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecology and society, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239
Lane, M. B. (2005). Public participation in planning: An intellectual history. Australian Geographer, 36(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325694
Marszal, A. J., Heiselberg, P., Bourrelle, J. S., Musall, E., Voss, K., Sartori, I., & Napolitano, A. (2011). Zero Energy Building–A review of definitions and calculation methodologies. Energy and buildings, 43(4), 971-979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.12.022
Mostafavi, M., & Doherty, G. (2016). Ecological urbanism. Harvard Design Press.
Nilsson, K., Pauleit, S., Bell, S., Aalbers, C., & Nielsen, T. A. S. (Eds.). (2013). Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Springer Science & Business Media.
Rovers, R. (2019). Zero energy design: A guide for sustainable building. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315186101
Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Sanoff, H. (2000). Community participation methods in design and planning. John Wiley & Sons.
Sartori, I., Napolitano, A., & Voss, K. (2012). Net zero energy buildings: A consistent definition framework. Energy and Buildings, 48, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.01.032
Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. R. (2012). Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40), 16083–16088. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109
Simon, D. (2008). Urban environments: Issues on the peri-urban fringe. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.021407.093240
Torcellini, P., Pless, S., Deru, M., & Crawley, D. (2006). Zero energy buildings: A critical look at the definition. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemela, J., & James, P. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and urban planning, 81(3), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Project for Public Spaces.
Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wai Yan Oo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
