Artificial wetlands in the conservation of water resources: An ecocentrism perspective

Authors

  • ZAINAL FADRI Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/jimese.v2i1.2024.1033

Keywords:

water pollution, technique of artificial wetlands, ecocentrism

Abstract

Background: Water pollution is a kind of environmental damage. Water pollution occurs in developing countries and developed countries. The government has made efforts to preserve water resources. However, it has only reached some levels of society because there are still many facilities that are more important than transportation, food security, and the security system. This research sees ecocentrism given the artificial marsh technique as the conservation of water resources as well as highlights equality of the purpose of the artificial marsh technique with the principle proposed ecocentrism about morality against the universe, so the proposed environmental ethics principles that have to be met in the implementation of the artificial marsh technique on sustainable preservation of water resources planning. Method: This research is library research. The research analysis is an analysis of the approach to a concept; the first phase is the interpretation and categorization, the second phase is data classification, the third phase is the analysis of synthesis, and the fourth phase is a critical evaluation by using element methodical as description, verstehen, interpretation, hermeneutic, inductive, and heuristic. Findings: The result shows that human beings have a duty to manage and preserve nature, and man is forbidden to exploit nature. Views ecocentrism is seen in the preservation of water resources as an effort to protect and preserve nature. Conclusion: Human beings are a part of the universe and are obliged to manage and preserve the guard, so the artificial marsh technique can be used in planning to preserve sustainable water resources. Novelty/Originality of this study: This research could lead to a new model for engaging communities in water conservation projects emphasizing the ethical relationship between humans and nature. This model could include educational programs and practical activities that help communities understand and apply the principles of ecocentrism in their daily lives.

References

Carm, P. Go. O. (1989). Etika Lingkungan Hidup. Malang: Sekretariat Kelompok Kerja Awamisasi Keuskupan.

Keraf, A. S. (2010). Etika Lingkungan Hidup. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Khiatuddin, M. (2003). Melestarikan Sumber Daya Air dengan Teknologi Rawa Buatan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Manahan, S. (2001). Fundamental of Environmental Chemistry, 2rd ed. Michigan: Lewis Publisher.

Manjappa, K. (2002). No More Fishing in The Dark. Deccan Herald. February (2).

Marfai, M. A. (2012). Etika Lingkungan dan Kearifan Lokal. Yogyakarta: GMDU PKSS.

Martin, Greg. (2002). Conceptualizing Cultural Politics in Subcultural and Social Movement Studies. Social Movement Studies, 1 (1). 73–88.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830120118909.

Mujib, F., Ariwidodo, E., & Mushollin. (2015). Tradisi Oto-Oto: Integrasi Sosial Masyarakat Urban Madura di Surabaya. Nuansa Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan Islam, 12 (1). 1–17.

https://doi.org/10.19105/nuansa.v12i1.695.

Mulyadi, D. (1997). Aspek Tanah dan Teknis Pertanian dalam Hubungan dengan Pengembangan Daerah Rawa. Jakarta: Dep. PUTL Dirjen Pengairan.

Naess, Arne. (1993). Ecology, Community and Lifestyle. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Noor. (1992). Kearifan Tradisional Masyarakat Pedesaan dalam Pemeliharaan Lingkungan Hidup. Yogyakarta: Balai Kajian Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional.

Pawitra, T. A., & Tan, K. C. (2003). Tourist Satisfaction in Singapore: a Perspective from Indonesian Tourists. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 13 (5). 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520310495868.

Saad, S. & Salman, A. (2017). Government Policy and the Challenge of Eradicating Human Trafficking in Malaysia. Journal of Education, 10 (6). 66–74.

Saeni, M. S. (1989). Krisis Lingkungan. Bogor: Departeman Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Pendidikan Tinggi Pusat Antar Universitas Ilmu Hayati Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Safitri, A. & Suharno. (2020). Budaya Siri’ Na Pacce dan Sipakatau dalam Interaksi Sosial Masyarakat Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 22 (1). https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v22.n1.p102-111.2020.

Sastrosupeno, M. S. (1984). Manusia, Alam dan Lingkungan. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Sinukaban, N. (1996). Konservasi Tanah dan Air, Masyarakat Konservasi Tanah dan Air Indonesia. Bogor: Departeman Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Pendidikan Tinggi Pusat Antar Universitas Ilmu Hayati Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Situmorang, S. (2013). Reformasi Jaminan Sosial di Indonesia: Tranformasi BPJS, Indahnya Harapan Pahitnya Kegagalan. Depok: Cinta Indonesia.

Soemarwoto, Otto. (2001). Atur-Diri-Sediri: Paradigma Baru Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Soerjani, Moh., et al. (1987). Lingkungan: Sumber Daya Alam dan Kependudukan dalam Pembangunan. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Suharno. (2011). Politik Rekognisi dalam Peraturan Daerah Tentang Penyelesaian Konflik di Masyarakat Multikultural. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Suharto, Edi. (2010). Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Rakyat: Kajian Strategis Pembangunan Kesejahteraan Sosial dan Pekerjaan Sosial. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Zen, M. T. (1979). Menuju Kelestarian Lingkungan Hidup. Jakarta: Penerbit PT Gramedia.

Published

2024-07-31

How to Cite

FADRI, Z. (2024). Artificial wetlands in the conservation of water resources: An ecocentrism perspective . Journal of Innovation Materials, Energy, and Sustainable Engineering, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.61511/jimese.v2i1.2024.1033

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check