The relationship between curriculum innovation and graduates' quality level

Authors

  • Ari Eka Setyaningrum Department of Islamic Education Management, Postgraduate Program, Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto, Central Java 53124, Indonesia
  • Ifada Novikasari Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri, Purwokerto, Central Java 53124, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/ipercop.v3i2.2026.2010

Keywords:

curriculum innovation, graduate quality, quantitative correlation

Abstract

Background: Curriculum innovation plays an important role in improving the competence, adaptability, and competitiveness of graduates in response to changing educational and societal demands. This study examines the relationship between curriculum innovation and graduate quality at SMA Muhammadiyah Boarding School Zam-Zam. Methods: This study employed a quantitative correlational approach. The population consisted of 236 alumni from the 2024/2025 academic year. An initial sample of 70 respondents was determined using the Slovin formula with a 10% margin of error and random sampling. Following data screening, 30 complete and valid responses were retained for statistical analysis. Data were collected using a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed through validity, reliability, normality, linearity, Pearson correlation, and simple linear regression tests. Findings: The results demonstrate a strong and statistically significant positive relationship between curriculum innovation and graduate quality. Pearson correlation analysis produced an r value of 0.707 (p < 0.001), while simple linear regression showed a significant effect of curriculum innovation on graduate quality (F = 27.982, p < 0.001). The coefficient of determination (R² = 0.500) indicates that curriculum innovation explains 50% of the variance in graduate quality. The regression coefficient was positive (B = 0.854), indicating that higher levels of curriculum innovation are associated with higher graduate quality. Conclusion: Curriculum innovation has a significant and substantial relationship with graduate quality at SMA Muhammadiyah Boarding School Zam-Zam. Sustainable curriculum development, technological integration, Islamic boarding school values, and strengthening of 21st-century competencies are important components in supporting graduate quality. Novelty/Originality of this Article: This study provides empirical evidence on the relationship between curriculum innovation and graduate quality within an integrated Islamic boarding school context, contributing to the limited literature examining curriculum innovation and graduate outcomes in this educational setting.

References

Afif, Z., Azhari, D. S., Kustati, M., & Sepriyanti, N. (2023). Scientific research (quantitative) along with paradigms, approaches, basic assumptions, characteristics, data analysis methods and output. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(3), 682–693. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative%0APenelitian

All, M. A., Kamaruddin, S. A., & Ahmadin. (2024). Curriculum innovation: Analysis of factors influencing curriculum development in the digital era. PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, 4(1), 1232–1237. https://doi.org/10.56799/peshum.v4i1.7068

As'adiyah, & Abdurrahman. (2024). Strategy to improve graduate quality in the leading language program at SMA Nurul Jadid. Jurnal Educatio, 10(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v10i1.6763

Ayu, S., & Rosli, M. S. B. (2020). Reliability test of SPADA (learning system in network) usage instrument. Biormatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.35569/biormatika.v6i1.706

Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Vighio, M. S., Alblehai, F., Soomro, R. B., & Shutaleva, A. (2024). Investigating AI-based academic support acceptance and its impact on students’ performance in Malaysian and Pakistani higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(14), 18695–18744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12599-x

Djollong, A. A. (2014). Technique of quantitative research. Istiqra’, 2(1), 86–100. https://jurnal.umpar.ac.id/index.php/istiqra/article/view/224

Fajar, A., Setiawan, F., & Fadila, M. (2022). National education system law revision policy. Journal of Education and Development, 10(3), 170–174. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v10i3.3945

Fatimah, I., et al. (2021). Curriculum innovation strategy: A theoretical review. EduTeach: Journal of Education and Learning Technology, 2(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.37859/eduteach.v2i1.2412

Gamage, K. A. A., Dehideniya, D. M. S. C. P. K., & Ekanayake, S. Y. (2021). The role of personal values in learning approaches and student achievements. Behavioral Sciences, 11(7), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11070102

Gümüş, A. (2022). Twenty-first-century teacher competencies and trends in teacher training. In Y. Alpaydın & C. Demirli (Eds.), Educational theory in the 21st century. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9640-4_11

Hafizon, A., Mansur, A., & Bakar, A. (2022). The concept of curriculum innovation and learning of Islamic religious education. Indonesian Journal of Educational Science Research, 1(2), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpion.v1i2.63

Hasanah, U. (2020). Analysis of quality and quality of input-process-output of education at MAN 2 Yogyakarta. MANAGERE: Indonesian Journal of Educational Management, 2(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.52627/ijeam.v2i2.38

Hossain, K. A. (2023). Evaluation of technological breakthrough in global education and future employment opportunity. Journal of Liberal Arts and Humanities, 4(8), 1–62.

Indrati, B., & Hermawan, A. (2023). Output and quality of education. Karimiyah, 3(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.59623/karimiyah.v3i1.30

Janna, N., & Herianto. (2021). The concept of validity and reliability testing using SPSS. Darul Dakwah Wal-Irsyad (DDI) Journal, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/v9j52

Kamarudin, I., Firmansah, D., Zulkifli, Amane, A. P., & Nasarudin. (2023). Quantitative research methodology. PT Global Executive Technology.

Khalilov, T., Aliyev, V., Guliyeva, M., & Babayeva, M. (2024). Strategic management mechanisms, directions, and functions in higher education. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(2), 12146–12162. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2

Khasanah, U. (2022). Development of educational curriculum: Innovation and review. Tahta Media Group.

Kurniati, P., Kelmaskouw, A. L., Deing, A., & Haryanto, B. A. (2022). The independent curriculum innovation process model and its implications for 21st century students and teachers. Journal of Citizenship Virtues, 2(2), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.37640/jcv.v2i2.1516

Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic interaction between student learning behaviour and learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influencing factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059

Li, S., & Wang, W. (2022). Effect of blended learning on student performance in K–12 settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1254–1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12696

Makarim, N. (2022). Regulation of the minister of education and culture, research, technology and higher education number 5 of 2022.

Mariam, S., & Sukirman, D. (2021). The function of early childhood education (PAUD) curriculum management. Jurnal Inovasi Kurikulum, 18(2), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v18i2.36457

Mustajib, U. S. D. (2020). Implementasi manajemen mutu sebagai upaya meningkatkan mutu lulusan di MTs Al Huda Sumberjo Tunglur Badas. Salimiya: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Keagamaan Islam, 1(4), 73–89. https://ejournal.iaifa.ac.id/index.php/salimiya

Ningsih, T., Yuwono, D., Sholehuddin, M., & Suharto, A. (2021). The significant of e-assessment for Indonesian literacy with character education in pandemic era. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(4), 231–256. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/220460/

Ridha, N. (2020). Proses penelitian, masalah, variabel dan paradigma penelitian. Hikmah, 14(1), 62–70. https://e-jurnal.staisumatera-medan.ac.id/index.php/hikmah/article/view/18 .

Rojak, A. (2022). Learning management in improving the quality of graduates at Madrasah Aliyah in Serang City, Banten Province. Al-Afkar: Journal for Islamic Studies, 5(4), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v5i4.381

Sabdarifanti, T., Hanifah, N., Rizqi, A. K., & Artajaya, U. (2021). Curriculum innovation: Educational materials. JIRA: Journal of Innovation and Academic Research, 2(10), 1460–1476. https://doi.org/10.47387/jira.v2i10.234

Smith, C., & Bath, D. (2006). The role of the learning community in the development of discipline knowledge and generic graduate outcomes. Higher Education, 51, 259–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6389-2

Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (2024). Evaluasi validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif: Sebuah studi pustaka. Journal of Education Research, 5(4), 5599-5609. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1747

Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (2024). Menentukan populasi dan sampel: Pendekatan metodologi penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(4), 2721–2731. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i4.2657

Sugiyono. (2020). Quantitative, qualitative and R&D research methodology. Alfabeta.

Sugono, D. (2008). Indonesian dictionary. Language Center.

Suwar, A., & Azhar, A. (2022). Analisis perencanaan peningkatan kualitas mutu lulusan di sekolah. Tadabbur: Jurnal Peradaban Islam, 4(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.22373/tadabbur.v4i2.299

Syafar, D., Sidik, F., & Arif Kurniawan, M. (2024). Menentukan dan mengukur standar mutu pendidikan (Studi di sekolah dasar negeri Kota Gorontalo). Tadbir: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 12(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.30603/tjmpi.v12i1.4693

Usdarisman, U., Hendrayadi, H., Azhari, D. S. ., & Basit, A. . (2024). Pengertian dan konsep dasar kurikulum dalam berbagai perspektif. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 7(3), 7578–7586. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v7i3.29784

Utomo, S. T., & Ifadah, L. (2020). Inovasi kurikulum dalam dimensi tahapan pengembangan kurikulum pendidikan agama Islam. Journal of Research and Thought on Islamic Education (JRTIE), 3(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.24260/jrtie.v3i1.1570

Rachmad, Y. E. (2022). Emotional integration theory. Heidelberger Schloss Buch Internationaler Verlag.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-12

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check