Konflik sosial dan lingkungan di sektor energi terbarukan: Tinjauan pada skala global

Authors

  • Hannysyah Roesdi Sekolah Ilmu Lingkungan, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Rahmawati Lestari Sekolah Ilmu Lingkungan, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Ratna Amini Sekolah Ilmu Lingkungan, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/environc.v1i1.2024.581

Keywords:

economy and environment, renewable energy, social conflicts

Abstract

The increasing social and environmental issues and the depletion of natural resources have led many countries to shift from using non-renewable energy sources (fossil fuels) to renewable energy sources (solar energy, geothermal, etc.). This energy transition is aimed at sustainable practices. However, the process poses new social, economic, and environmental challenges that policymakers must address effectively. Economic support from the government is a key factor in the success of implementing this transition. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that the shift to renewable energy has generated social conflicts among stakeholders, such as debates over the construction of power plants that are perceived to have limited benefits for the communities around the plant area. The need for renewable energy arises as a solution to the insufficient electricity supply in developing countries, especially in rural areas. Various stakeholders offer solutions to overcome social challenges in the community during this transition. The objective of this literature review is to identify and analyze social and environmental issues arising from the transition from non-renewable to renewable energy sources. The results obtained will be presented descriptively, supplemented with matrices or tables. The articles used in this study draw examples from the implementation of renewable energy transitions in various countries such as Taiwan, Canada, Brazil, Poland, South Korea, Indonesia, and others. The challenges faced by each country in implementing renewable energy transitions exhibit similarities, and the solutions used to mitigate these challenges also share commonalities.

References

Aguilar-Støen, Mariel , Cecilie Hirsch. (2017). Bottom-up responses to environmental and social impact assessments: A case study from Guatemala, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 62, 2017, Pages 225-232, ISSN 0195-9255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.08.003

Bidwell, D. (2017). Ocean beliefs and support for an offshore wind energy project. Ocean & Coastal Management, 146, 99-108.

Christidis, Tanya, Geoffrey Lewis, Philip Bigelow. (2017). Understanding support and opposition to wind turbine development in Ontario, Canada and assessing possible steps for future development. Renewable Energy, Volume 112, 2017, Pages 93-103, ISSN 0960-1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.005

Dall-Orsoletta, Alaize , Jorge Cunha, Madalena Araújo, Paula Ferreira, A systematic review of social innovation and community energy transitions, Energy Research & Social Science, Volume 88, 2022, 102625, ISSN 2214-6296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102625

Frate, Claudio Albuquerque , Christian Brannstrom. (2017). Stakeholder subjectivities regarding barriers and drivers to the introduction of utility-scale solar photovoltaic power in Brazil. Energy Policy, Volume 111, 2017, Pages 346-352, ISSN 0301-4215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.048

Hall, N. , P. Ashworth, P. Devine-Wright. (2013). Societal acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies. Energy Policy, Volume 58, 2013, Pages 200-208, ISSN 0301-4215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.009

Hernández-Cedeño, I., Nelson, P. F., & Anglés-Hernández, M. (2021). Social and environmental conflict analysis on energy projects: Bayesian predictive network approach. Energy Policy, 157(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112515

Israel, Alena, Rocío Juliana Herrera. (2020). The governance of Peruvian energy transitions: Path dependence, alternative ideas and change in national hydropower expansion, Energy Research & Social Science, Volume 69, 2020, 101608, ISSN 2214-6296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101608

Kałuża, T., Hämmerling, M., Zawadzki, P., Czekała, W., Kasperek, R., Sojka, M., ... & Dach, J. (2022). The hydropower sector in Poland: Barriers and the outlook for the future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 163, 112500.

Laumanns, U., Reiche, D., & Bechberger, M. (2004). Renewable energies in developing countries: Issues, interests, and implications. Energy and Environment, 15(4), 731–741. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958305042259774

Mile Mišić & Anastassia Obydenkova (2022) Environmental conflict, renewable energy, or both? Public opinion on small hydropower plants in Serbia, Post-Communist Economies, 34:5, 684-713, DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2021.1943928

Oh, H. T., Chung, Y., Jeon, G., & Shim, J. (2021). Review of the marine environmental impact assessment reports regarding offshore wind farm. Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 24(11), 341-350.

Pavlo Santander, Fabio A. Cruz Sanchez, Hakim Boudaoud, Mauricio Camargo, Social, political, and technological dimensions of the sustainability evaluation of a recycling network. A literature review, Cleaner Engineering and Technology, Volume 6, 2022, 100397, ISSN 2666-7908,

Pratiwi, Santi , Nataly Juerges. (2022). Addressing energy injustice in rural landscapes: Community leadership, indigenous villages, and micro-hydro diffusion in Indonesia. Energy Research & Social Science, Volume 85, 2022, 102395, ISSN 2214-6296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102395

Rodríguez-Segura, Francisco Javier , Juan Carlos Osorio-Aravena, Marina Frolova, Julio Terrados-Cepeda, Emilio Muñoz-Cerón. (2022).Social acceptance of renewable energy development in southern Spain: Exploring tendencies, locations, criteria and situations. Energy Policy, Volume 173, 2022, 113356, ISSN 0301-4215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113356

Sheng, Z., Zheng, B., & Qingmei, T. (2019). Sustainable Hydropower Development Research in China–based on Tripartite Evolutionary Game. International Energy Journal, 19(1).

Süsser, Diana , Nick Martin, Vassilis Stavrakas, Hannes Gaschnig, Laura Talens-Peiró, Alexandros Flamos, Cristina Madrid-López, Johan Lilliestam. (2022). Why energy models should integrate social and environmental factors: Assessing user needs, omission impacts, and real-word accuracy in the European Union. Energy Research & Social Science, Volume 92, 2022, 102775, ISSN 2214-6296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102775

Wang, H. W., Dodd, A., & Ko, Y. (2022). Resolving the conflict of greens: A GIS-based and participatory least-conflict siting framework for solar energy development in southwest Taiwan. Renewable Energy, 197, 879-892.

Zárate-Toledo, Ezequiel , Rodrigo Patiño, Julia Fraga. (2019). Justice, social exclusion and indigenous opposition: A case study of wind energy development on the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico. Energy Research & Social Science. Volume 54, 2019, Pages 1-11, ISSN 2214-6296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.004

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Roesdi, H., Lestari, R., & Amini, R. (2024). Konflik sosial dan lingkungan di sektor energi terbarukan: Tinjauan pada skala global. Environment Conflict, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.61511/environc.v1i1.2024.581

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check