Implementation of land acquisition for development of public interest: Analytical study on the construction of bypass road facilities to the Mandalika special economic zone
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v2i1.2024.789Keywords:
land acquisition, Mandalika Special Economic Zone, public interestAbstract
Background: This study aims to determine the procedures for implementing land acquisition for constructing the Lombok International Airport ByPass road to the Land Acquisition Area for constructing the Lombok International Airport ByPass road to the Mandalika Special Economic Zone. Methods: This study uses empirical legal research with the statutory, conceptual, and sociological approaches. The data types in this study are primary and secondary, while the data sources use library research and field research. Techniques and ways of obtaining data are by conducting interviews and observations. The purpose of this study is to find out the procedures for implementing land acquisition for the construction of the Lombok International Airport ByPass road to the Mandalika Special Economic Zone, and to find out the inhibiting factors in this activity. Findings: The procedure for implementing land acquisition for the construction of the Lombok International Airport By Pass to the Mandalika Special Economic Zone as stipulated in Law Number 11 of 2020 Ciptaker regulates 4 (four) stages of acquisition starting from planning, preparation, implementation, and delivery of results. Conclusion: The land acquisition implementation committee has carried out land acquisition procedures following the provisions of the Laws and Regulations. The obstacles in constructing the Lombok International Airport By Pass road to the Mandalik Special Economic Zone include social, cultural, and economic factors. Novelty/Originality of this Study: An empirical examination of the land acquisition process for a major infrastructure project, specifically the Bypass Road from Lombok International Airport to the Mandalika Resort Special Economic Zone, employs a multifaceted approach encompassing legislative, conceptual, and sociological perspectives. This study uniquely identifies and analyzes the social, cultural, and economic barriers affecting the land acquisition process, providing insights into community dynamics and compensation issues within the context of Indonesian agrarian law and development.
References
Amerasinghe, C. F. (1992). Issues of Compensation for the Taking of Alien Property in the Light of Recent Cases and Practice. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 41(1), 22-65. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/41.1.22
Argyrou, A. (2017). Making the case for case studies in empirical legal research. Utrecht Law Review, 13(3), 95-113. https://utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.409
Budianto, A. (2020). Legal research methodology reposition in research on social science. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1339-1346. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.154
Budiastanti, D. E., Laila, K., Sabrina, N., Wisnuwardhani, D. A., & Wisuda, S. (2022). Compensation for land rights holders according to the land acquisition law. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i2.7970
Bokings, J. C. R. (2022). Dispute Settlement Model of Land Acquisition for Public Interest. Damhil Law Journal, 2(1), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.56591/dlj.v1i1.1247
Edelman, L. B., & Stryker, R. (2005). 23 A sociological approach to law and the economy. The handbook of economic sociology, 527. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835584.527
Fellmeth, A. X. (2005). Civil and criminal sanctions in the constitution and courts. Geo. LJ, 94, 1. https://ssrn.com/abstract=715302
Ghimire, S., Tuladhar, A., & Sharma, S. R. (2017). Governance in land acquisition and compensation for infrastructure development. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 5(3), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170503.17
Henley, D. (2008). Natural resource management: historical lessons from Indonesia. Human Ecology, 36, 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-007-9137-2
Kadir, M. F., & Rahmatiah, H. L. (2021). Land Acquisition for Jenelata Dam Building in Gowa; A Comparative Study. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 14-34. https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.v3i1.19550
Kroeger, T., & Casey, F. (2007). An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands. Ecological economics, 64(2), 321-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.021
Lipovac, K., Nešić, M., Tešić, M., Ross, A., Tubić, V., & Marić, B. (2016). A comparative analysis of dangerous locations on the public roads in Serbia. Safety science, 84, 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.019
Lockwood, M. (2010). Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes. Journal of environmental management, 91(3), 754-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.005
McMorran, R., & Scott, A. (2013). Community landownership: rediscovering the road to sustainability. Lairds: Scottish Perspectives on Upland Management, 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748685882-013
Mduluza, T., Midzi, N., Duruza, D., & Ndebele, P. (2013). Study participants incentives, compensation and reimbursement in resource-constrained settings. BMC medical ethics, 14, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-S1-S4
Nadriana, L., & Hastoro, G. R. (2021, October). Socialization of Regional Regulations of Teluk Bintuni Regency Number 1 Year 2019 Dealing Recognition and Protection of Traditional Law Communities In Teluk Bintuni District. ICCD, 3(1), 552-556. https://doi.org/10.33068/iccd.Vol3.Iss1.421
Nurnaningsih, N. (2023). Legal Interpretation of Regulation Law No. 2 of 2012 Concerning Land Acquisition for Development in The Public Interest. Veteran Law Review, 6(SpecialIssues), 70-84. https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v6iSpecialIssues.5761
Pacione, M. (2013). Private profit, public interest and land use planning—A conflict interpretation of residential development pressure in Glasgow's rural–urban fringe. Land use policy, 32, 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.013
Parker, C. (2009). Tunnel-bypasses and minarets of capitalism: Amman as neoliberal assemblage. Political Geography, 28(2), 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.12.004
Rustan, M., & Hidayah. (2019). The Social Function of the Rights and Benefits of Land (utilty) on Landowners regarding the Development of General Interest. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 8(12), 345-359. https://www.ijicc.net/images/vol8iss12/81222_Rustan_2019_E_R.pdf
Said, S. N. F., & Irwansyah, I. (2019). Land Acquisition by the Government and the Impact for the Community. Papua Law Journal, 3(2), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.31957/plj.v3i2.788
Santos, G., Behrendt, H., & Teytelboym, A. (2010). Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport. Research in transportation economics, 28(1), 46-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2010.03.002
Sari, E., Yamin, M., Purba, H., & Sembiring, R. (2021). Comparison of Land Law Systems: A Study on Compensation Arrangements and Reappraisal of Land Acquisition for Public Interest between Indonesia and Malaysia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 872-880. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.103
Saxena, K. B. (2008). Development, displacement, and resistance: The law and the policy on land acquisition. Social Change, 38(3), 351-410. https://doi.org/10.1177/004908570803800301
Sitompul, M. M. R., Sitepu, R., Akbar, F., & Sirait, N. N. (2024). Establishing a Welfare State: Optimizing the Role of the State-Owned Enterprise. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 51(5). https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.51.5.18
Spierenburg, M., Steenkamp, C., & Wels, H. (2008). Enclosing the local for the global commons: community land rights in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area. Conservation and society, 6(1), 87-97. https://journals.lww.com/coas/fulltext/2008/06010/enclosing_the_local_for_the_global_commons_.8.aspx
Suryadi, P., & Santiago, F. (2022, January). Economic Value as Legal Considerations for The Utilization of State-Owned. In Proceedings of the First Multidiscipline International Conference, MIC 2021, October 30 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-10-2021.2315734
Tagliarino, N. K. (2017). The status of national legal frameworks for valuing compensation for expropriated land: An analysis of whether national laws in 50 countries/regions across Asia, Africa, and Latin America comply with international standards on compensation valuation. Land, 6(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/land6020037
Tagliarino, N. K., Bununu, Y. A., Micheal, M. O., De Maria, M., & Olusanmi, A. (2018). Compensation for expropriated community farmland in Nigeria: An in-depth analysis of the laws and practices related to land expropriation for the Lekki Free Trade Zone in Lagos. Land, 7(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7010023
Trihatmoko, R. A., & Susilo, Y. S. (2023). Conditions, Challenges and Prospects of State-owned Enterprises in Indonesia: The Governance Perspective Based on Economic Constitution. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 18(5), 2459-2484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-023-10194-9
Van Rooij, B. (2007). The return of the landlord: Chinese land acquisition conflicts as illustrated by peri-urban Kunming. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 39(55), 211-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2007.10756176
Wirzba, N. (Ed.). (2003). The essential agrarian reader: The future of culture, community, and the land. University Press of Kentucky.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal Of Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
