From regulation to trust: Governance pathways in digital pawnshop transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v4i1.2026.3331Keywords:
digital finance, governance, pawnshop institutions, public trust, regulationAbstract
Background: Pawnshop institutions operate within regulated non-bank financial systems and play an important role in providing financial access for economically vulnerable communities. In the digital finance era, regulatory compliance alone has proven insufficient to sustain institutional legitimacy, as public trust increasingly depends on how governance principles are implemented and perceived in practice. Existing studies on pawnshop businesses predominantly emphasize regulatory structures or operational efficiency, while offering limited conceptual integration between regulation, governance, and institutional trust. Methods: This study employs a qualitative conceptual and policy-oriented literature review based exclusively on secondary sources, including academic journal articles, books, international organization reports, and national regulations. Governance theory, regulatory governance, and institutional trust serve as the primary theoretical foundations, which are analyzed through systematic document review, thematic synthesis, and conceptual mapping. Findings: The analysis demonstrates that regulatory frameworks provide a necessary legal foundation but do not automatically generate public trust. Trust formation is primarily shaped by governance practices related to transparency, accountability, ethical conduct, fairness, and clarity of communication, particularly under digital service delivery conditions that intensify information asymmetry. Governance practices function as mediating mechanisms that translate regulatory intent into institutional behavior perceived by the public. Conclusion: Transforming pawnshop institutions in the digital finance era requires a strategic shift from compliance-centered regulation toward governance arrangements explicitly designed to cultivate and sustain public trust. Novelty/Originality of this article: This article offers an integrative conceptual framework that positions governance practices as the central mediating link between regulation and public trust, providing policy-relevant insights for strengthening legitimacy and trust in digitally transforming pawnshop institutions.
References
Anagnostopoulos, I. (2018). Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.07.003
Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2017). FinTech, RegTech, and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 37(3), 371-413. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb/vol37/iss3/2
Bachmann, R., Gillespie, N., & Priem, R. (2015). Repairing trust in organizations and institutions: Toward a conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 112-136. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0001
Boot, A., Hoffmann, P., Laeven, L., & Ratnovski, L. (2021). Fintech: What's old, what's new? Journal of Financial Stability, 53, Article 100836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100836
Carlin, B. I., & Gervais, S. (2009). Legal protection in retail financial markets. Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3571-3596. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp019
de Fine Licht, J. (2014). Policy area as a potential moderator of transparency effects: An experiment. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 361-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12194
de Fine Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., & Gilljam, M. (2014). When does transparency generate legitimacy? Experimenting on a context-bound relationship. Governance, 27(1), 111-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12021
Felzmann, H., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., & Tamo-Larrieux, A. (2020). Transparency you can trust: Transparency requirements for artificial intelligence between legal norms and contextual concerns. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720960542
Gomber, P., Koch, J.-A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital finance and FinTech: Current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0852-x
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Knies, E. (2017). Validating a scale for citizen trust in government organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 583-601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315585950
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575-586. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12047
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Trusting the stock market. Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2557-2600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01408.x
Hu, Z., Ding, S., Li, S., Chen, L., & Yang, S. (2019). Adoption intention of FinTech services for bank users: An empirical examination with an extended technology acceptance model. Symmetry, 11(3), Article 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030340
Jafri, J. A., Amin, S. I. M., Rahman, A. A., & Nor, S. M. (2023). A systematic literature review of the role of trust and security on FinTech adoption in banking. Heliyon, 9(12), Article e22980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22980
Jünger, M., & Mietzner, M. (2020). Banking goes digital: The adoption of FinTech services by German households. Finance Research Letters, 34, Article 101260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.08.008
Kshetri, N. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in promoting financial inclusion in developing countries. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 24(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2021.1871273
Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 12-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204272371
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Wiley.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
Morgan, P. J., Huang, B., & Trinh, L. Q. (2021). Consumer protection and financial literacy in Asia. Asian Development Review, 38(1), 109-135. https://doi.org/10.1162/adev_a_00158
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264236882-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). Trust and public policy: How better governance can help rebuild public trust. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268920-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Building trust to reinforce democracy: Main findings from the 2021 OECD survey on drivers of trust in public institutions. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b407f99c-en
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2016). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 31/POJK.05/2016 tentang usaha pergadaian. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/114553
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2020). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 12/POJK.05/2020. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/139351
Ouma, S. A., Odongo, T. M., & Were, M. (2017). Mobile financial services and financial inclusion: Is it a boon for savings mobilization? Review of Development Finance, 7(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2017.01.001
Ozili, P. K. (2018). Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(4), 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003
Ryu, H.-S. (2018). What makes users willing or hesitant to use FinTech? The moderating effect of user type. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(3), 541-569. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2017-0325
Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, Article 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551
Six, F. (2013). Trust in regulatory relations. Regulation & Governance, 7(2), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01150.x
Stewart, H., & Jürjens, J. (2018). Data security and consumer trust in FinTech innovation in Germany. Information & Computer Security, 26(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-06-2017-0039
Suri, T., & Jack, W. (2016). The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science, 354(6317), 1288-1292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5309
Thakor, A. V. (2020). Fintech and banking: What do we know? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 41, Article 100833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2019.100833
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/39257/uu-no-21-tahun-2011
van der Cruijsen, C., de Haan, J., & Roerink, R. (2021). Trust in financial institutions. Journal of Financial Stability, 53, Article 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100827
Zetzsche, D. A., Arner, D. W., & Buckley, R. P. (2020). Decentralized finance. Journal of Financial Regulation, 6(2), 172-203. https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjaa010
Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Barberis, J. N. (2018). From FinTech to TechFin: The regulatory challenges of data-driven finance. New York University Journal of Law & Business, 14(2), 393-446. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2959925
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rini Wedhayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
