Optimalisasi peran pihak ketiga yang berkepentingan dalam praperadilan melalui penegakan hukum menuju pembaharuan hukum acara pidana

Authors

  • Ananda Chrisna D. Panjaitan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v1i2.2024.294

Keywords:

interested thrid parties , pretrial , renewal of criminal procedure law

Abstract

This article will explain the important role of third parties in pretrial institutions and analyze the legal standing of non-governmental organizations in reforming criminal procedural law. The additional interpretation made by the Constitutional Court Decision provides legal standing to the community represented by Non-Governmental Organizations as supervisors of possible errors or arbitrariness in terminating investigations or discontinuing prosecutions. Furthermore, in reforming the criminal procedure law, Commissioner Judges, who in the RKUHAP have duties and authority that have advantages compared to the Pretrial Institution in the KUHAP, are expected to also provide access to interested third parties, one of whose subjects is the public, to submit applications freely in accordance with the certain requirements.

References

Alfiananda, R. F. (2018). Pengujian Sah Tidaknya Penetapan Tersangka dalam Kerangka Praperadilan. Wacana Hukum, 24(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v24i1.2998

Aprilia, S. S., Siregar, E., & Munandar, T. I. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Tersangka Melalui Upaya Praperadilan. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 4(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v4i1.24097

Faizal, L. (2012). Perilaku Penegak Hukum Menuju Penegakan Hukum Progresif dalam Persfektif Pembangunan Hukum Nasional. ASAS, 4(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/asas.v4i1.1666

Ismail, D. E., & Tamu, Y. (2009). Upaya Perlindungan Hak-Hak Tersangka/Terdakwa Melalui Mekanisme Praperadilan di Kota Gorontalo. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 21(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16256

Julmahdi, J., Surya, A., & Harahap, V. S. (2022). Strategi Komunikasi Penyidik Kepolisian Resor Aceh Tengah Dalam Proses Interogasi Tersangka Tindak Pidana Pembakaran Rumah. Telangke: Jurnal Telangke Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55542/jiksohum.v4i1.140

Jumadi, J. (2018). Efektifitas Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Jatiswara, 33(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v33i1.155

Kusumastuti, E. (2018). Penetapan Tersangka Sebagai Obyek Praperadilan. Yuridika, 33(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i1.7258

Metria, K. (2017). Objek Praperadilan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014. Jatiswara, 32(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v32i2.123

Soekanto, S. (2004). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. https://doi.org/https://senayan.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=1427&keywords=

Sutiyoso, B. (2016). Implementasi Gugatan Legal Standing dan Class Action dalam Praktik Peradilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 11(26), 63–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss26.art5

Downloads

Published

2024-01-09

How to Cite

Panjaitan, A. C. D. (2024). Optimalisasi peran pihak ketiga yang berkepentingan dalam praperadilan melalui penegakan hukum menuju pembaharuan hukum acara pidana . Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal Of Law, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v1i2.2024.294

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check