Optimalisasi peran pihak ketiga yang berkepentingan dalam praperadilan melalui penegakan hukum menuju pembaharuan hukum acara pidana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v1i2.2024.294Keywords:
interested thrid parties , pretrial , renewal of criminal procedure lawAbstract
This article will explain the important role of third parties in pretrial institutions and analyze the legal standing of non-governmental organizations in reforming criminal procedural law. The additional interpretation made by the Constitutional Court Decision provides legal standing to the community represented by Non-Governmental Organizations as supervisors of possible errors or arbitrariness in terminating investigations or discontinuing prosecutions. Furthermore, in reforming the criminal procedure law, Commissioner Judges, who in the RKUHAP have duties and authority that have advantages compared to the Pretrial Institution in the KUHAP, are expected to also provide access to interested third parties, one of whose subjects is the public, to submit applications freely in accordance with the certain requirements.
References
Alfiananda, R. F. (2018). Pengujian Sah Tidaknya Penetapan Tersangka dalam Kerangka Praperadilan. Wacana Hukum, 24(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v24i1.2998
Aprilia, S. S., Siregar, E., & Munandar, T. I. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Tersangka Melalui Upaya Praperadilan. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 4(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v4i1.24097
Faizal, L. (2012). Perilaku Penegak Hukum Menuju Penegakan Hukum Progresif dalam Persfektif Pembangunan Hukum Nasional. ASAS, 4(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/asas.v4i1.1666
Ismail, D. E., & Tamu, Y. (2009). Upaya Perlindungan Hak-Hak Tersangka/Terdakwa Melalui Mekanisme Praperadilan di Kota Gorontalo. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 21(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16256
Julmahdi, J., Surya, A., & Harahap, V. S. (2022). Strategi Komunikasi Penyidik Kepolisian Resor Aceh Tengah Dalam Proses Interogasi Tersangka Tindak Pidana Pembakaran Rumah. Telangke: Jurnal Telangke Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55542/jiksohum.v4i1.140
Jumadi, J. (2018). Efektifitas Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Jatiswara, 33(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v33i1.155
Kusumastuti, E. (2018). Penetapan Tersangka Sebagai Obyek Praperadilan. Yuridika, 33(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i1.7258
Metria, K. (2017). Objek Praperadilan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014. Jatiswara, 32(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v32i2.123
Soekanto, S. (2004). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. https://doi.org/https://senayan.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=1427&keywords=
Sutiyoso, B. (2016). Implementasi Gugatan Legal Standing dan Class Action dalam Praktik Peradilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 11(26), 63–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss26.art5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal Of Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.