Digital communication, the dynamics of radicalization, and legal responses to the transformation of Muslim discourse and identity: A literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v4i1.2026.2924Keywords:
digital communication, legal policy, Muslim identity, radicalismAbstract
Background: This study aims to examine how digital communication practices contribute to radicalization, how criminal policy responses address this phenomenon, and what implications this has for discourse, identity, and the psychological well-being of Muslim communities. Methods: This study is a qualitative literature review. Secondary data in the form of books, journal articles, and policy documents were systematically collected and then analyzed qualitatively-descriptively through data reduction, thematic presentation, and argumentative synthesis. Findings: Analysis shows that the radicalization process is produced by a combination of three layers, including persuasive content and framing that supports claims of authenticity; micro social networks that provide validation of networked pathways; and the technical architecture of platforms that increases exposure. Criminal responses and platform regulation are effective only when repressive measures are complemented by algorithm transparency, take-down procedures that include due process, media literacy programs, and psychosocial support services. Cross-study qualitative evidence indicates a strong relationship between technical amplification and increased discourse homogeneity that facilitates the mobilization of extreme ideas. Conclusion: Preventing digital radicalization requires an integrated approach through criminal law that focuses on recruitment and glorification of violence, transparent technical governance, and community-based communication interventions to strengthen moderate identities and psychological well-being. These policies and measures need to be assessed through the lens of maqasid al-shari’ah to ensure they are proportional and sensitive to religious values. Novelty/Originality of this article: The novelty aspect refers to the new or innovative elements in a research study that distinguish it from previous work. It includes unique contributions, new methods, or findings that have not been explored before in the field.
References
Abdullah, M. M., H., A., Hasan, A. A., Ali, D. B., Al-Maeeni, M. K. A., Gdheeb, S. H., & Salman, S. D. (2022). International Covenanton Civil and Political Rights: Highlighting the implications for Iraq. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 17(1), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756098
Adebayo, G. O. (2021). Counter-radicalization policies and policing in education: making a case for human security in Europe. Heliyon, 7(2), e05721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05721
Alias, M. N., Abdullah, M. N., Osman, M. F., Ismail, N. F., & Kamis, M. S. (2025). The Position of Maqasid al-Shariah within Islamic Legal Sources: A Comprehensive Analysis. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 9(2), 937–964. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v9i2.26659
Anggraini, D. D. (2024). Pengaturan anti-terorisme dalam hukum positif Indonesia dan hukum pidana Islam: Suatu studi perbandingan. Muqaranah, 8(2), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.19109/41e2km10
Arguedas, A. R., Robertson, C. T., Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2022). Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/echo-chambers-filter-bubbles-and-polarisation-literature-review
Aryaeinejad, K., & Scherer, T. L. (2024). The role of the internet and social media on radicalization: What research sponsored by the National Institute of Justice tells us. National Institute of Justice (NIJ). https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/305797.pdf
Aulia, P., Muklis, M., & Pulungan, R. (2025). Perbandingan perspektif hukum pencegahan kejahatan dunia maya dalam hukum positif dan hukum pidana Islam. Jurnal El-Thawalib, 6(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-thawalib.v6i2.14928
Ayalew, Y. E. (2025). A third-world critique of the international human rights-based approach to content moderation. Transnational Legal Theory, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2025.2523184
Ayanian, A. H., Adra, A., Zeineddine, F. B., Saab, R., Vollhardt, J. R., & Tausch, N. (2025). Collective action under repressive conditions: Integration of individual, group, and structural level research, recommendations, and reflections. Social Issues and Policy Review, 19(1), e70000. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.70000
Badouard, R., & Bellon, A. (2025). Introduction to the special issue on content moderation on digital platforms. Internet Policy Review, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2025.1.2005
Balzacq, T., & Settoul, E. (2022). Radicalization and religious violence in Western Europe: An introduction. In T. Balzacq & E. Settoul (Eds.), Radicalization in theory and practice: Understanding religious violence in Western Europe (pp. 1–20). University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12202059
Bans-Akutey, A., & Tiimub, B. M. (2021). Triangulation in research. Academia Letters, Article 3392. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3392
Bélanger, J. J., Robbins, B. G., Muhammad, H., Moyano, M., Nisa, C. F., Schumpe, B. M., & Blaya-Burgo, M. (2020). Supporting political violence: The role of ideological passion and social network. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(8), 1187–1203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220933954
Binder, J. F., & Kenyon, J. (2022). Terrorism and the internet: How dangerous is online radicalization? Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997390
Büttner, C. M., Lalot, F., & Rudert, S. C. (2023). Showing with whom I belong: The desire to belong publicly on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107535
Carrillo, A. J. (2020). The price of prevention: Anti-terrorism pre-crime measures and international human rights law. Virginia Journal of International Law, 60(3), 571–650. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3671065
Cheong, H., Lyons, A., Houghton, R., & Majumdar, A. (2023). Secondary qualitative research methodology using online data within the context of social sciences. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231180160
Chigbu, U. E., Atiku, S. O., & Du Plessis, C. C. (2023). The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising. Publications, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010002
Cuenca, M. C. S., & Pérez, N. E. (2025). The role of social media as a source of information and perception of insecurity. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 31(3), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-025-09628-x
Czakon, W., Mania, K., Jedynak, M., Kuźniarska, A., Choiński, M., & Dabić, M. (2024). Who are we? Analyzing the digital identities of organizations through the lens of micro-interactions on social media. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 123012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123012
Ehrhardt, D., & Umar, M. S. (2020). Pathways to radicalization: Learning from Boko Haram life histories. In A. R. Mustapha & M. Meagher (Eds.), Overcoming Boko Haram (pp. 169–192). James Currey. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787446595.010
Ellefsen, R., & Jämte, J. (2023). The causes, content and consequences of repression: A framework for analyzing protest control in the counter-extremism era. Social Movement Studies, 22(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2067140
Ferguson, J., Ecklund, E. H., & Rothschild, C. (2021). Navigating religion online: Jewish and Muslim responses to social media. Religions, 12(4), 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12040258
Franco, L., & Boniel-Nissim, M. (2024). Adolescents’ exposure to violent content related to conflict on social media: Qualitative research. In J. Višňovský & J. Majerová (Eds.), Social media and modern society - How social media are changing the way we interact with the world around. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1005821
Gongane, V. U., Munot, M. V., & Anuse, A. D. (2022). Detection and moderation of detrimental content on social media platforms: current status and future directions. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 12(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00951-3
Hamim, K., & Supriadi, L. (2020). The contextualization of ḥifẓ al-’irḍ on hoax news (A study on Imam Tājuddīn al-Subkī’s Maqāṣīd al-Sharī’a). Ulumuna, 24(2), 348–366. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v24i2.405
Haq, S. U., & Kwok, R. Y. (2024). Encountering “the Other” in religious social media: A cross-cultural analysis. Social Media + Society, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241303363
Hnit, H., & Almanna, A. (2025). Constructing identity through narratives: Personal, social, and digital dimensions. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101692
Hoffmann, A. (2024). Counter-terrorism and human rights at the UN Security Council: Blurring boundaries in a social space. Global Studies Quarterly, 4(3), ksae054. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksae054
Ibrahim, Z. S., Karimullah, S. S., Assaad, A. I., Septiani, R., & Okur, H. (2025). Integration of Maqaṣid al-Shari’ah in the criminal law reform to achieve justice and human dignity. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 23(1), 105–144. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v23i1.04
Kamaludin, A., & Iskandar, I. (2022). Islamic fanatism and terrorism cases in Indonesia the perspective of Islamic criminal law. El-Mashlahah, 12(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v12i2.4397
Kanya, M., Davis, P., & Robertson, G. C. (2025). Constantly connected: What healthcare providers need to know about vicarious trauma in an evolving digitally connected global community. Missouri Medicine, 122(4), 304–309. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40787018
Karimullah, S. S., Assaad, A. I., Septiani, R., & Okur, H. (2025). Integration of Maqaṣid al-Shari’ah in the Criminal Law Reform to Achieve Justice and Human Dignity. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 23(1), 105–144. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v23i1.04
Kaskeleviciute, R., Knupfer, H., & Matthes, J. (2025). “I stand up for us”: Muslims’ feelings of stigmatization in response to terrorism on social media. New Media & Society, 27(7), 4285–4307. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241236712
Kavrakis, K. (2023). Identity and ideology through the frames of Al Qaeda and Islamic State. Terrorism and Political Violence, 35(5), 1235–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2022.2035366
Li, K., Li, J., & Li, Y. (2024). The effects of social media usage on vicarious traumatization and the mediation role of recommendation systems usage and peer communication in China after the aircraft flight accident. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 15(1), 2337509. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2024.2337509
Li, Y., & Cao, J. (2025). The role of recommendation algorithm in online social platforms. Procedia Computer Science, 261, 674–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.04.320
Mahmudova, L., & Evolvi, G. (2021). Likes, comments, and follow requests: The Instagram user experiences of young Muslim women in the Netherlands. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture, 10(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-bja10038
Malby, S. (2025). Beyond sword and shield: the UN Human Rights system and criminal law. The International Journal of Human Rights, 29(5), 916–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2432953
Marizaldi, D., Pratama, M. H., Sulatiasto, A. G., & Budiharso, A. (2025). From clicks to violence: A Study on the role of social media in radicalization and Terrorism. Jurnal Akta, 12(2), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i2.44872
McKeever, D. (2021). Revisiting Security Council action on terrorism: New threats; (a lot of) new law; same old problems? Leiden Journal of International Law, 34(2), 441–470. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156521000066
Miró-Llinares, F. (2023). El Derecho penal como coartada: Aprosimación a la estructura de la comunicación sobre el crimen y la ley penal en Twitter. InDret, 2, 445–492. https://doi.org/10.31009/InDret.2023.i2.10
Mughal, R., DeMarinis, V., Nordendahl, M., Lone, H., Phillips, V., & Boyd-MacMillan, E. (2023). Public mental health approaches to online radicalisation: An empty systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(16), 6586. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20166586
Müller, J., & Friemel, T. N. (2024). Dynamics of digital media use in religious communities—A theoretical model. Religions, 15(7), 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15070762
Musarrofa, I., & Rohman, H. (2023). ’Urf of cyberspace: Solutions to the problems of Islamic law in the digital age. Al-Ahkam, 33(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2023.33.1.13236
Neumann, K., & Baugut, P. (2023). All radicalization is local: Media influence on local Islamist radicalization processes in five German and Austrian hotspots. International Journal of Communication, 17, 5802–5822. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/21234
Nur, I., Adam, S., & Muttaqien, M. N. (2020). Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘at: The main reference and ethical-spiritual foundation for the dynamization process of Islamic law. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 20(2), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v20i2.18333
Obermaier, M., Schmuck, D., & Saleem, M. (2021). I’ll be there for you? Effects of Islamophobic online hate speech and counter speech on Muslim in-group bystanders’ intention to intervene. New Media & Society, 25(9), 2339–2358. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211017527
Oktavianus, J., & Davidson, B. (2023). Countering terrorism on social media: An analysis of online anti-terrorism movement in Indonesia. Communication and the Public, 8(4), 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473231189898
Omidi, A., Khan, K. H., & Schortz, O. (2024). Explaining the vicious circle of political repression and Islamic radicalism in Central Asia. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2350115
Pérez-Torres, V. (2024). Social media: a digital social mirror for identity development during adolescence. Current Psychology, 43(26), 22170–22180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05980-z
Pope, E. M., Brandão, C., Bower, K., & Verdugo-Castro, S. (2023). Qualitative research for interdisciplinary studies: Multiple methodologies for multiple disciplines. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 16, e825. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.16.2023.e825
Robinson, M. M. (2022). Social media recruitment and online propaganda by extremist groups. Honors Program Theses, 531. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt/531
Rohid, N., Sugihartati, R., Suyanto, B., Susilo, D., & Zikri, A. (2025). Digital Activism in Contemporary Islamic Politics: A Critical Analysis of Social Media’s Impact on Islamic Movements. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(1), 208–233. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10159
Rosidi, M. H., Mokhtar, A. W. Bin, & Majid, M. N. B. A. (2022). The role of Maqasid al-shari’ah as a fundamental ethics in social media use. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(4), 1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i4/13044
Rothut, S., Schulze, H., Hohner, J., Greipl, S., & Rieger, D. (2026). Radicalization and the internet: 25 years of (online) radicalization research. The Communication Review, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2026.2658935
Rusli, N., Kadir, F. K. A., Embong, A. H., Rahman, A. H. A., Salamun, H., & Kadir, K. A. (2024). Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿa-based analysis of learning modules for Muslim reverts in East Coast Malaysia. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(9), e06456. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-014
Setiyono, J., & Rasyid, S. (2022). Counter-narrative strategies in deradicalisation: A content analysis of Indonesia’s anti-terrorism laws. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 78(1), a7791. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i1.7791
Sipayung, A., Sumartono, S., Saleh, C., Rochmah, S., & Rozikin, M. (2023). Dynamics implementation of de-radicalism policy to prevent terrorism in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(9), e772. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i9.772
Sudrajat, T., Hendriana, R., & Jati, B. (2024). Countering radicalism of the government officials in Indonesia: An insider’s look into government efforts. Krytyka Prawa, 16(1), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.667
Syafi’i, I., & Hamidah, T. (2022). Maslahah Controvers As Sources, Methods and Objectives (Comparative Analysis Study of The Four Madhhab). Al-`Adalah: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum Islam, 7(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.31538/adlh.v7i1.1642
Tal-Or, N., & Razpurker-Apfeld, I. (2025). The impact of media narratives on the audience’s self: Immediate and delayed effects. Journalism and Media, 6(3), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6030107
Uyheng, J., & Montiel, C. J. (2024). Digital interfaces of repression and resistance. In F. B. Zeineddine & J. R. Vollhardt (Eds.), Resistance to Repression and Violence (pp. 201–222). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197687703.003.0010
van Bezouw, M. J., van der Toorn, J., & Becker, J. C. (2021). Social creativity: Reviving a social identity approach to social stability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2732
Wahid, S. H. (2024). Exploring the intersection of Islam and digital technology: A bibliometric analysis. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101085
Wang, X., Koneru, S., Venkit, P. N., Frischmann, B., & Rajtmajer, S. (2025). The unappreciated role of intent in algorithmic moderation of abusive content on social media. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-180
Wanto, D., Hidayat, R., & Repelita, R. (2021). Maqasid shariah’s Change as Theory: From Classical to Cotemporary Maqasid Shariah. Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam, 6(2), 427–454. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v6i2.3122
Ware, J. (2023). The third generation of online radicalization. GW Program on Extremism. https://extremism.gwu.edu/third-generation-online-radicalization
Weale, S. (2024). Social media algorithms ‘amplifying misogynistic content.’ The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/feb/06/social-media-algorithms-amplifying-misogynistic-content
Whittaker, J. (2022). Online radicalisation: What we know. Publications Office of the European Union. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-11/RAN-online-radicalisation_en.pdf
Winter, C., Neumann, P., Meleagrou-Hitchens, A., Ranstorp, M., Vidino, L., & Fürst, J. (2020). Online extremism: Research trends in internet activism, radicalization, and counter-strategies. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 14(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-3809
Zamroni, M., Astuti, Y. D., & Zuhri, A. (2021). Religious radicalism frame in the online media news (Framing analysis reporting of “ISIS” in Republika.co.id and Tempo.co). Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 21(1), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v0i0.5837
Zuhdi, M. H., & Nasir, M. A. (2024). Al-Mashlahah and reinterpretation of Islamic law in contemporary context. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 8(3), 1818–1839. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i3.24918
Zulfahmi, Z., Asrofi, A., & Suroto, S. (2024). A review of Islamic law on the practice of" Tumpang Rahim" based on Maqāsid al-Syarī’ah and contemporary scholars. MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 4(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.v4i2.3544
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zul Fahmi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
