SETARA: Reformulating legal protection for women workers amid the evolution of artificial intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v3i2.2026.2253Keywords:
artificial intelligence, female labor, labor law reform, legal protection, SETARAAbstract
Background: The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has reshaped the global labor market and poses significant challenges to female workers, who are more likely to be employed in repetitive and data-based sectors vulnerable to automation. This study aims to examine the urgency of legal protection and labor law reform in Indonesia to address the potential risk of unemployment, gender discrimination, and social inequality arising from AI-driven automation. Previous studies have highlighted that women face structural disadvantages in the labor market due to their concentration in low-wage sectors and limited access to digital skills, as also emphasized by UNESCO. However, existing Indonesian labor regulations, such as the Manpower Law and Job Creation Law, have not explicitly regulated the impact of AI in employment. Methods: The research applies a normative juridical method with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach, supported by literature reviews of international practices in Germany and Singapore, where governments have initiated reskilling and vocational education policies to mitigate the impact of AI. Findings: Findings reveal that the absence of specific legal provisions in Indonesia leads to legal uncertainty and weak protection for women workers facing layoffs due to automation. This study proposes the concept of SETARA (Strategy for Empowering and Transforming Women’s Labor) as a strategic model to strengthen the role of female workers. The strategy consists of three core elements: reskilling, upskilling, and labor law literacy, implemented through a pentahelix collaboration involving government, businesses, society, academia, and mass media. Conclusion: The principal conclusion is that labor law reform in Indonesia must be adaptive to technological disruption and inclusive of gender perspectives to ensure sustainable and equitable labor protection. Novelty/Originality of this article: The novelty of this research lies in integrating gender-sensitive legal reform with AI governance through the SETARA model, which provides an innovative framework to balance technological advancement with social justice.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2022). Tasks, automation, and the rise in U.S. wage inequality. Econometrica, 90(5), 1973–2016. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA19815
Alfitri, A. (2016). The welfare state ideology in the foundations of the Indonesian state: An analysis of Constitutional Court decisions regarding the national social security system. Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk932
Arief, T. M. V. (2025, January 28). AI di Indonesia: Kesenjangan akses dan pekerja terancam disrupsi. Kompas.com. https://money.kompas.com/read/2025/01/28/120607326/ai-di-indonesia-kesenjangan-akses-dan-pekerja-terancam-disrupsi?page=all
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Tingkat pengangguran terbuka berdasarkan jenis kelamin, 2024. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MTE3NyMy/tingkat-pengangguran-terbuka-berdasarkan-jenis-kelamin.html
Brussevich, M., Dabla-Norris, E., Kamunge, C., Karnane, P., Khalid, S., & Kochhar, K. (2018). Gender, technology, and the future of work. IMF Staff Discussion Notes, 18(07). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484378809.006
De Stefano, V. (2019). ‘Negotiating the algorithm’: Automation, artificial intelligence and labour protection. Artificial Intelligence and Labour Protection (May 16, 2018). Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 41(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3178233
Ernst, E., Berg, J., & Moore, P. V. (2024). Editorial: Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Humans in control. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 1378893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1378893
Gmyrek, P., Berg, J., & Bescond, D. (2023). Generative AI and jobs: A global analysis of potential effects on job quantity and quality (ILO Working Paper No. 96). International Labour Organization. https://webapps.ilo.org/static/english/intserv/workingpapers/wp096/index.htm
Habibani, R. A., Frinaldi, A., & Roberia. (2024). The application of the principle of legality in public administration policy. Multidisciplinary Journal of Science, 2(12), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.59435/gjmi.v2i12.751
Harahap, A. M. (2019). Perlindungan hukum bagi tenaga kerja melalui perjanjian kerja bersama. CV. Manhaji.
Harahap, A. M. (2020). Pengantar hukum ketenagakerjaan. Literasi Nusantara.
Harini, S. (2023). Potret gender dalam pembangunan berkelanjutan. Unisri Press.
Hasugian, Y. E. (2026). Analisis dampak Artificial Intelligence (AI) terhadap Sektor Tenaga Kerja di Indonesia. Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 3(1), 84–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v3i1.1501
Judijanto, L., & Muhdiarta, U. (2025). Social and economic implications of AI and automation: A global literature review. Journal of Community Dedication, 5(1), 70–82. https://adisampublisher.org/index.php/pkm/article/view/1009
Keputusan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Nomor 64/DPR RI/I/2024–2025 tentang Program Legislasi Nasional Rancangan Undang-Undang Prioritas Tahun 2025 dan Program Legislasi Nasional Rancangan Undang-Undang Tahun 2025–2029.
Kristianus, A. (2023, June 6). Sri Mulyani: 60% pekerja wanita di sektor informal minim perlindungan dan berupah rendah. Berita Satu. https://www.beritasatu.com/ekonomi/1071822/sri-mulyani-60-pekerja-wanita-di-sektor-informal-minim-perlindungan-dan-berupah-rendah
Lestari, S. A., Rabani, D. T., Sari, E. M., & Ardiana, H. R. (2025). Termination of employment due to automation and artificial intelligence: Labor law challenges in Indonesia. Doktrin: Journal of Law and Political Science, 3(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v3i1.4451
Manikantan, R., & Reddy, D. R. (2025). A systematic review of artificial intelligence and automation in employment. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 17(1), 097–103. https://ijsra.net/content/systematic-review-artificial-intelligence-and-automation-employment
Marwala, T., Mpedi, L.G. (2024). Labor Law. In: Artificial Intelligence and the Law. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2827-5_10
Nurdiansyarani, R. E. (2024, April 2). Apakah AI mengancam stabilitas ketenagakerjaan? Begini kata pakar ekonomi. Universitas Airlangga. https://unair.ac.id/ai-mengancam-stabilitas-ketenagakerjaan-begini-kata-pakar-unair/
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Hukum progresif: Hukum untuk manusia, bukan manusia untuk hukum. Kompas.
Safa’at, R. (2023). Advokasi dan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa: Latar belakang, konsep, dan implementasi (Ed. revisi). Inteligensia Media.
Shaw, W. (2025, January 9). Wall Street job losses may top 200,000 as AI replaces roles. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-01-09/wall-street-expected-to-shed-200-000-jobs-as-ai-erodes-roles
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.
Tyson, L., & Lund, S. (2020). The future of work in America: People and places, today and tomorrow. McKinsey Global Institute Report. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work
Wajcman, J. (2017). Automation: Is it really different this time?. The British Journal of Sociology, 68(1), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12239
World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020
Yusrodi. (2023). Peran Perguruan Tinggi Dalam Menerapkan Pentahelix Untuk Mengembangkan UMKM Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer, VI(03), 11–14.
Zulfiyandi. (2021). Tenaga kerja dalam data, edisi ke-4 tahun 2021. Pusat Data dan Teknologi Informasi Ketenagakerjaan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shalsa Bila Agustina, Lusiana Novalia Simanungkalit

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.













