Indonesia and the rohingya crisis: An analysis of the role of transit countries in refugee protection

Authors

  • Joko Jumadi Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Mataram, Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara 83111, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v3i1.2025.2044

Keywords:

refugee, asylum seeker, transit, Indonesia

Abstract

Background:  This article examines Indonesia's role as a transit country in handling Rohingya refugees fleeing violence and persecution in Myanmar. On the other hand, this study also highlights ad hoc policies and humanitarian practices carried out by the central government, local governments, international organizations, and local communities in Aceh in accommodating and assisting Rohingya refugees. Methods: Using a normative legal approach and policy analysis, this study evaluates Indonesia's national legal framework which does not specifically regulate refugee status, thus creating challenges in providing long-term protection. Findings: The results of the study show that although Indonesia is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention, the principle of non-refoulement and the value of human solidarity have been the basis of a relatively consistent temporary policy. Conclusion: This article recommends the need to strengthen national regulations, multi-party coordination mechanisms, and increase the capacity of related institutions so that Indonesia can carry out its role as a transit country more effectively, humanely, and in line with human rights principles. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study offers a comprehensive analysis of Indonesia's role as a transit country in handling Rohingya refugees, which has previously been rarely studied in depth from a national legal and policy perspective. This study also raises the importance of integrating the principle of non-refoulement into domestic regulations as an innovation in more sustainable refugee protection policies.

References

Adwani, A., Rosmawati, R., & Aiyub Kadir, M. Y. (2021). the Responsibility in Protecting the Rohingya Refugees in Aceh Province, Indonesia: an International Refugees Law Perspective. IIUM Law Journal, 29((S2)), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v29i(s2).677

Ajawaila, D. P., Matulapelwa, A. H., & Ngongare, S. (2022). Peranan Indonesia Dalam Kasus Etnis Rohingya Berdasarkan Konsep Responsibility to Protect (R2P). JURNAL SAINS SOSIAL DAN HUMANIORA (JSSH), 2(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52046/jssh.v2i1.1204

Aling, D. M. R. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Krisis Pengungsi Rohingya di Aceh dan Peran UNHCR di Indonesia Berdasarkan Hukum Organisasi Internasional. Lex Privatum, 14(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/58369

Asmara, M. T., & Syahrin, A. (2021). Aktualisasi Kebijakan Imigrasi Indonesia terkait Hak Asasi Manusia bagi Pengungsi Rohingya di Indonesia. Journal of Law and Border Protection, 1(2), 73–84.

Dedi. (2024). Sederet Aksi Kriminal Imigran Rohingya di Aceh, dari Narkoba Hingga Perkosa Anak di Bawah Umur. Viva.Co.Id. https://www.viva.co.id/trending/1664361-sederet-aksi-kriminal-imigran-rohingya-di-aceh-dari-narkoba-hingga-perkosa-anak-di-bawah-umur.%0A%0A

Ernawati, N. (2019). The Legal consequences of the Application of Two Australian Policies as Members of the 1951 Refugee Convention Reviewed from the VCLT 1969. Jurnal IUS, 7(1).

Fadilah, F. P., Hakim, M. A. T., Frefy, F. A. P., & Wahyuni, R. (2024). Peran Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa dalam Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Terhadap Etnis Rohingya di Myanmar: Perspektif Responsibility to Protect Concept. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(3), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11663887.

Havez, M., Ernawati, N., Pitaloka, D., Rosidi, A., & Jumadi, J. (2024). Balancing Local Community Interest and International Responsibilities in the Context of the Expulsion of Rohingya Refugees in Aceh. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 21(4), 6. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol21.4.1823

Hermawan, B. B. (2017). Tantangan ASEAN Dalam Melakukan Penanganan Pengungsi Rohingya. Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(3), 569–586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n3.a8

Itasari, E. R. (2020). The Role of The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission Of Human Rights In Giving Protection To The Ethics Rohingya Of The Spirit In Southeast Asia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 8(3), 569–583. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i3.803

Kingston, L. N. (2018a). Protecting the world’s most persecuted: the responsibility to protect and Burma’s Rohingya minority. In The responsibility to protect (pp. 179–191). https://doi.org/9781315537153

Kingston, L. N. (2018b). Protecting the world’s most persecuted: the responsibility to protect and Burma’s Rohingya minority. In The Responsibility to Protect (pp. 179–191). Routledge.

Kneebone, S., Missbach, A., & Jones, B. (2021). The False Promise of Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016? Asian Journal of Law and Society, 8(3), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2021.2

Liliansa, D., Liliansa, D., & Jayadi, A. (2015). Should Indonesia Accede To The 1951 Refugee Convention And Its 1967 Protocol ? 5(3). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v5n3.161

Paripurna, C. F., Pradita, R. D., Priageng, S. P., & Ummah, A. (2024). Global Citizen and Shared Responsibility: Addressing the Rohingya Refugee Crisis in Indonesia. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(6), 697–704. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum3406

Putri, E. A., Wahyuni, W. S., Syaputra, M. Y. A., Paramesvari, A. J., & Pratama, G. A. (2023). Legal Protection of Rohingya Citizens Related to The Conflict in Myanmar. Jambura Law Review Law Review, 5(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v5i1.16722

Sadjad, M. S. oed. (2021). What Are Refugees Represented to Be? A Frame Analysis of the Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016 Concerning the Treatment of Refugees “from Abroad.” Asian Journal of Law and Society, 8(3), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2021.3

Setiawan, A., & Hamka, H. (2020). Role of Indonesian Humanitarian Diplomacy toward Rohingya Crisis in Myanmar. August 2017. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.5-11-2019.2292481

Sudrajat, T., Jati, B. K. H., & Gupta, C. M. (2024). Questioning Indonesia’s Role in Addressing Rohingya Refugees: A Legal, Humanitarian, and State Responsibility Perspective. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 7(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1.10506

Sukendro, A., Santoso, P., Sumertha, I. G., Puspasari, P., & Maysara, M. M. (2022). Conflict Resolution in Handling Foreign Refugees in West Jakarta , Indonesia. 3(4), 1–7.

Sumarlan, Y. (2019). Political economy of pragmatic refugee policies in Indonesia as a transit country. Asian Review, 32(3), 63–93. https://doi.org/https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/arv/article/view/240363.

Syahrin, M. A. (2018). The Rohingya Refugee Crisis: Legal Protection on International Law and Islamic Law. 1st International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies (ICILS 2018), . 94-99. https://doi.org/10.2991/icils-18.2018.18

Zetter, R., & Ruaudel, H. (2018). Refugees’ right to work and access to labour markets: constraints, challenges and ways forward. Forced Migration Review, 58(June), 4–7. www.fmreview.org/economies

Zulkarnain. (2023). Acehnese Residents Dilemma Facing Thousands of Rohingya Refugees Continue to Arrive. Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/baca/english/2023/11/19/en-aceh-mulai-menolak-pengungsi-rohingya.

Published

2025-07-30

How to Cite

Jumadi, J. (2025). Indonesia and the rohingya crisis: An analysis of the role of transit countries in refugee protection. Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal Of Law, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v3i1.2025.2044

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check