Transitivity system of the lexemes development, growth, and sustainability in the mass media regarding the relocation of the Indonesian capital city: An ecological discourse analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/linkage.v3i1.2026.3105Keywords:
analysis of transitivity, ecolinguistics, mass media, relocation of national capitalAbstract
Background: The development, growth, and sustainability of relocating Indonesia’s national capital have become ecological crisis phenomena, making language use in mass media crucial for shaping the public perception of environmental issues. This study aims to analyze the transitivity system of the lexical items “development,” “growth,” and “sustainability” in mass media coverage of the relocation of Indonesia’s national capital. Methods: This study employs a mixed-methods design. The data consist of words and clauses sourced from news articles about the relocation of Indonesia’s national capital in media outlets Kompas.com for the years 2023–2024. Data were collected using Octoparse and Bootcat and subsequently analyzed with AntConc 4.3.1. A total of 974 articles were obtained, comprising 294,169 tokens. Concordances containing the lexemes “development,” “growth,” and “sustainability” were analyzed using transitivity theory within the Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) framework of Halliday and Matthiessen (2014). Findings: The results indicate a prevalence of material processes that foreground actions and events. The findings also reveal a dominance of non-natural resource entities as the source domain and passive participants in clauses. This transitivity pattern reflects eco-ambivalent discourse grounded in the eco-philosophy principle of “recognition of rights for all parties,” which represents an anthropocentric perspective. Conclusion: The findings reveal how Kompas.com mass media express the experiences and perspectives of stakeholders in an ambivalent manner regarding the relocation of the national capital. Novelty/Originality of this article: The study’s novelty lies in the lexeme “development,” in the use of Kompas.com news from 2023–2024 as the object of analysis, and in the integration of diverse data-processing tools.
References
Aisaro, K., & Suhardi. (2023). Transitivity and context of the situation in the news text. Britain International of Linguistics, Arts, and Education Sciences Journal, 5(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.33258/biolae.v5i2.891-99-
Al-Behadily, S. H. M., & AL-Sheikh, S. A. (2019). Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein as a gothic fiction in a stylistic study of Halliday’s transitivity system. Jurnal Ashab Naseem, 3(1), 1–26. https://iasj.rdd.edu.iq/journals/uploads/2025/01/23/3c77f4d400f5a9f8108fdaa2a25c5882.pdf
Alexander, R., & Stibbe, A. (2014). From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse. Language Sciences, 41, 104–110. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.011
Ali, J. H. (2019). Ecolinguistics and Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL): Transitivity in “Climate Change in Egypt” by Ali Masria. Beni-Suef University International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.21608/buijhs.2019.91308
Awal, A. (2025). Ecolinguistics in Bangladeshi secondary-level English textbooks. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 27(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.21698
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan RI. (2022). Peran Badan pemeriksa Keuangan RI dalam SDGs. In Badan pemeriksa Keuangan RI. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan RI. https://www.bpk.go.id/assets/files/attachments/attach_page_1652255145.pdf
Buwono, H. A. (2025). Power and stakeholders in IKN Nusantara: Land use and environmental protection discourse in Indonesia’s new capital [Göteborgs Universitet]. https://hdl.handle.net/2077/88567
Cheng, M. (2022). Theoretical framework for ecological discourse analysis: A summary of New Developments of Ecological Discourse Analysis. Journal of World Languages, 8(1), 188–226. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0030
Cox, R. (2007). Nature’s “crisis disciplines ”: Does environmental communication have an ethical duty? Environmental Communication, 1(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030701333948
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Fill, A., & Mühlhäusler, P. (2006). The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment. In The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment. Continum.
Franklin, E., Gavins, J., & Mehl, S. (2022). “I don’t think education is the answer”: A corpus-assisted ecolinguistic analysis of plastics discourses in the UK. Journal of World Languages, 8(2), 284–322. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2022-0017
Hafez, O. M., & Hassaballah, D. M. (2025). The climate crisis as a supernatural being in English news reports 2019-2023: An ecolinguistic-critical metaphor analysis. Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts, 85. https://jarts.journals.ekb.eg/article_437845_a5fa695c50bb4497fae449a9b61af26b.pdf?lang=en
Halliday., & Matthiessen. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.
Hambali, M., Istianah, A., Susilowati, N. E., & Fajri, M. S. Al. (2025). Battling the climate crisis: WAR and THREAT metaphors in Indonesian news media through a corpus-ecolinguistics lens. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2526143
Hamed, D. (2021). Keywords and collocations in US presidential discourse since 1993: a corpus-assisted analysis. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 3(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhass-01-2020-0019
He, H., & Zhang, W. (2024). Ecological discourse analysis of the English translations of song of Peach Blossom Land from the perspective of transitivity. International Journal of English Linguistics, 14(3), 76. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v14n3p76
Hilal, N. A.-D. M., Komariah, K., & Ramelan, A. H. (2024). The multifaceted implications and challenges of relocating Indonesia ’ s capital city : A comprehensive review of socio-economic , environmental , urban planning , and policy considerations. Journal of Environment and Sustainability, 8(3), 375–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22515/sustinere.jes.v8i3.403
Ikfina, M. U. (2023). Indonesia’s national capital relocation policy : An analysis of political support in parliament and the public responses on Twitter. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v11i1.17760
Ismail, F., Gulzar, M. A., Shahzad, W., & Nabi, M. F. (2022). Transitivity analysis of English translation of “Azan”: A Hallidayan approach. International Journal of Special Education, 37(2), 41–50. https://iasj.rdd.edu.iq/journals/uploads/2025/01/23/3c77f4d400f5a9f8108fdaa2a25c5882.pdf
Isti’anah, A., Suhandano, S., & Al Fajri, M. S. (2025). Framing “Climate change” and “Global warming” in Indonesian mass media (2013–2022): Corpus-assisted ecolinguistics. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 46(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2025.46.1.08
Krasnopeyeva, E. S. (2023). Apart together in extremis: an exploratory study of online social media discourse on the emergency shift to distance interpreting. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313
Luan, L., & Zhang, D. (2024). Ecological discourse analysis of Russian educational texts based on the transitivity system. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2399369
Maha, R. F., Widayati, D., & Zein, T. T. (2022). Eufemism in environmental discourse of the movement capital Country in Indonesian Mass media: Critical ecolinguistics. Budapest International Research …, 5(1), 3727–3736. https://bircu-journal.com/index.php/birci/article/view/4057
Mansyur, S. A., Gunawan, W., & Isnendes, R. (2022). Human representation on environmental speech in terms or transitivity process. SAGA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.21460/saga.2022.31.117
Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Painter, C. (2010). Deploying functional grammar. The Commercial Press.
Mol, A. P. J. (2002). Ecological modernization and the global economy. Global Environmental Politics, 2(2), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1162/15263800260047844
Mol, A. P. J., & Sonnenfeld, D. A. (2007). Ecological modernisation around the world: An introduction. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010008414510
Noor, N., Farukh Arslan, M., Latif, T., & Noor, H. (2025). Lexical choices and environmental ideologies: A corpus based eco-linguistic analysis of Supreme court judgments in Pakistan. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 14(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2025.14.2.25
Nurpadillah, V., Mardikantoro, H. B., Mulyaningsih, I., & Wilsa, A. W. (2025). Power and identity representation in news on Indonesia’s capital relocation: A fairclough critical discourse analysis. Sawerigading, 31(1), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.26499/sawer.v31i2.1626
Pezzulo, P. C., & Cox, R. (2022). Environmental communication and the public spere. Sage Publications, Inc.
Poole, R. (2016). A corpus-aided ecological discourse analysis of the Rosemont Copper Mine debate of Arizona, USA. Discourse and Communication, 10(6), 576–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481316674775
Qulub, M. F. (2025). The Issue of Moving the Indonesian Capital: An Eco-Critical Discourse Analysis in Jokowi’s Speech. Abjad: Journal of Humanities &Education, 3(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.62079/abjad.v3i2.75
SCImago Media Rangkings. (2025). Media web reputation ranking. SCImago Media Rangkings. https://www.scimagomedia.com/rankings.php?content=General&country=Indonesia&edition=2025_01
Song, X., Bakar, K. A., Abas, A., & Wan Abdul Halim, W. F. S. (2025). A systematic literature review on ecological discourse analysis (2014-2023). Journal of World Languages, 11(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2024-0034
Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics, Language, Ecology, and the Stories We Live By. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.17456/simple-177
Subono, N. I., & Eriyanto. (2024). The new city megaproject’s issues: Network discourse analysis of the development of the pros and cons of the archipelago’s determination and capital development (IKN). Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 6(11), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss
Suhandano, S., Isti’anah, A., & Febrina, R. (2023). Contesting “growth” and “sustainability” in Indonesia’s capital city relocation: A corpus ecolinguistic study. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2023-9-3-0-5
Sultan, H., Rahmalidya, A., Shopura, A. W., Akmal, M. R., Fariz, T. R., Haryadi, H., & Lutfiananda, F. (2022). Analysis of land cover change and projection of settlement land in Sepaku district, North Penajam Paser Regency. Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.15294/jese.v2i2.58028
Suparno, D., Darojat, Z., Nurhuda, Z. Z., & Kurniawati, W. (2025). Ecolinguistics and transitivity analysis in sustainable development: The case of the Nusantara capital city. Towards Resilient Societies: The Synergy of Religion, Education, Health, Science, and Technology, 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003654940-45
Syaban, A. S. N., & Appiah-Opoku, S. (2023). Building Indonesia ’ s new capital city: An in-depth analysis of prospects and challenges from current capital city of Jakarta to Kalimantan prospects and challenges from current capital city of Jakarta to Kalimantan. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 11(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2023.2276415
Vuurst, P. Van de, & Escobar, L. E. (2020). Perspective: Climate change and the relocation of Indonesia’s capital to Borneo. Frontiers in Earth Science, 8(January), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00005
Wang, H., Zhai, R., & Zhao, X. (2019). Analysis of the un secretary-general’s remarks on climate change: From the view of ecolinguistics. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 851–857. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1004.24
Wei, R. R. (2021). An interpersonal framework of international ecological discourse. Journal of World Languages, 7(2), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2020-0004
Wiratno, T. (2018). Pengatar ringkas linguistik. Pustaka Pelajar.
Yahya, M., & Roselani, N. G. A. (2024). Representations of human domination in climate policy documents: A transitivity analysis. Issues in Applied Linguistics & Language Teaching, 6(1), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.37253/iallteach.v6i1.9307
Zheng, X. (2021). Transitivity structure of research articles: Variations across sections. English Language Teaching, 14(8), 8. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n8p8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Linkage
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
