Integration of social life in a bioeconomic approach for sustainable water resource policy and management in the Brantas River
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jek.v4i1.2026.3859Keywords:
Brantas River, community participation, environment, social life, sustainabilityAbstract
Background: Sustainable water resource management has become a major challenge in Indonesia due to increasing pressure from domestic, agricultural, and industrial activities on river environmental quality. The Brantas River, as one of the major rivers in East Java, has experienced declining water quality characterized by high Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) values, increased nutrient content, and biological contamination. These conditions are influenced not only by ecological factors but are also closely related to social behavior, community norms, and patterns of water resource utilization. This study aims to analyze the relationship between community social life and the ecological condition of the Brantas River through a bioeconomic approach and to identify the role of community participation in supporting sustainable water resource management. Methods: The study employs a descriptive qualitative approach based on a systematic literature review (SLR) using data obtained from scientific articles, government reports, and policy documents related to the Brantas River. The analysis was conducted thematically by integrating social and biophysical variables within the framework of bioeconomics and Social Ecological Systems (SES). Findings: The results indicate that the degradation of Brantas River water quality is influenced by the interaction between community economic activities, social behavior, and the ecological capacity of the river. Low environmental awareness, domestic waste disposal practices, and weak environmental management are the main factors contributing to increased pollution, while community participation and community-based monitoring positively contribute to river conservation efforts. Conclusion: This study concludes that the sustainability of Brantas River management depends not only on technical approaches but also on strengthening social governance, community participation, and the integration of bioeconomics into water resource management. Novelty/Originality of this article: The novelty of this research lies in its integrative approach that connects water quality indicators, economic activities, and social variables within a single socio-bioeconomic analytical framework to support more sustainable river management.
References
Aggarwal, R. M., & Anderies, J. M. (2023). Understanding how governance emerges in social-ecological systems: Insights from archetype analysis. Ecology and Society, 28(2), 25–26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-14061-280202
Ali, M., Wulandari, S. R., & Ferdiansyah, A. (2024). Keanekaragaman dan kelimpahan vegetasi riparian di sungai Saroka Kecamatan Saronggi Kabupaten Sumenep. Jurnal Ilmiah Biosaintropis (Bioscience-Tropic), 9(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.33474/e-jbst.v9i2.563
Aranceta-Garza, F., Ramírez-Luna, S., & Seijo, J. C. (2025). Bioeconomics of a regime shift by invasive epibiont species affecting a bivalve small-scale fishery. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 82(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaf004
Ba, Y., & Galik, C. S. (2022). Historical manufacturing volatility and local sustainability efforts: A link to the past. Global Environmental Change, 72, 102421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102421
Barbier, E. B. (2022). The policy implications of the dasgupta review: Land use change and biodiversity: invited paper for the special issue on “the economics of biodiversity: building on the dasgupta review” in environmental and resource economics. Environmental and Resource Economics, 83(4), 911–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00658-1
Bourceret, A., Amblard, L., & Mathias, J. D. (2022). Adapting the governance of social–ecological systems to behavioural dynamics: An agent-based model for water quality management using the theory of planned behaviour. Ecological Economics, 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107338
Budirahayu, T., Susanti, E., & Kuntari, S. (2024). Women ’ s awareness of river water quality and their vulnerability to use of Brantas River. Jurnal Sosiologi Dialekti, 19(1), 51–65. https://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jsd.v19i12024.51-65
Cahyani, W., & Irawanto, R. (2022). Pemantauan kualitas air dan keanekaragaman jenis vegetasi di bagian hulu sungai brantas Jawa Timur. Prosiding SNPBS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi dan Saintek), 299–307. https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/snpbs/article/view/1772
de Souza, F. C., & Cândido, G. A. (2024). Socio-ecological resilience in water systems: a literature review. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Ambientais, 59(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z2176-94782015
Estoque, R. C., Wu, J., & Verburg, P. H. (2026). Land system science for global environmental change and sustainability: Advances, challenges, and future directions. Geography and Sustainability, 7, 100415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100415
Fitriyah, I. J., Habiddin, H., Saputro, S., & Erlangga, S. Y. (2026). Seasonal water quality assessment and GIS ‑ based pollution mapping of the Brantas River toward sustainable water management and SDG 6. Discover Environment, 4, 513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-026-01064-w
Gholizadeh, H., Zoghipour, M. H., Torshizi, M., Nazari, M. R., & Moradkhani, N. (2021). Gone with the wind: Impact of soil-dust storms on farm income. Ecological Economics, 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107133
Gowsikraja, P. (2025). View of socio-ecological perspectives on sustainable fisheries and aquatic resource management. Journal of Aquatic Ecology and Environmental Sust, 2(2), 36–43. https://fsrap.com/index.php/JAEES/article/view/154/149
Hariwati, L. S., Efani, A., Wardana, F. C., Fathur, M., & Hasan, R. (2026). Impacts of land use / land cover changes on water quality in the upper brantas watershed: A spatio-Temporal Analysis Using Riparian Buffer Approach. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management (GJESM), 21(2), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2025.02.12
Holmes, R., McFarlane, K., Challies, E., MacNeil, C., & Arnold, J. (2025). The social–ecological fabric of freshwater fish management: Accounting for feedback loops in human–fish interactions. Ecosphere, 16(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70249
Irawanto, R., M Afifudin, A. F., Aurina Putri, A., Wulan Cahyani, N., Nurshafa Rahmania, F., Soemarno, Setyo Leksono, A., Yanuwiadi, B., Retnaningdyah, C., Riniwati, H., & Sugiyanto. (2024). Water quality analysis and water pollution effect from upstream to downstream of brantas river - east java. Jurnal Pembangunan dan Alam Lestari, 15(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpal.2024.015.01.04
Islamy, R. A., Hasan, V., Kamarudin, A. S., Mamat, N. B., Valen, F. S., & Mutmainnah, N. (2025). Biomonitoring of heavy metal pollution in the Brantas River using genotoxic and histopathological biomarkers in wild cyprinidae. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 26(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/206050
Kisam, A. R., & Yustiana, Y. (2025). Analysis of characteristics, bioeconomics, and optimization of sustainable management of largehead hairtail (Trichiurus Lepturus) commodities in coastal waters of pangandaran regency. 3BIO: Journal of Biological Science, Technology and Management, 7(2), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.5614/3bio.2025.7.2.4
Kurniawan, A., Dhea, L. A., Ulfa, S. M., Yanuar, A. T., & Zamzami, M. Al. (2025). Assessment of water quality in the upper Brantas River through microplastic-associated biofilms and heavy metal accumulation Assessment of water quality in the upper Brantas River. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 82(4), 1707–1729. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2025.2516390
Mahira, S., Jatmiko, Y. D., & Koentjoro, M. P. (2026). Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of tetracycline-resistant bacteria isolated from Brantas River, Malang Raya and their biofilm formation ability. Journal of Tropical Life Science, 16(1), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.11594/jtls.16.01.14.S
Nugroho, S. (2025). Operationalizing social-ecological system-based fishery management employing a system dynamics model: Lessons from eel fishery. Ecological Modelling, 509(July), 111276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111276
Pahl-Wostl, C., & Knieper, C. (2023). Pathways towards improved water governance: The role of polycentric governance systems and vertical and horizontal coordination. Environmental Science and Policy, 144, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.03.011
Pahl-Wostl, C., Knieper, C., Lukat, E., Meergans, F., Schoderer, M., Schütze, N., Schweigatz, D., Dombrowsky, I., Lenschow, A., Stein, U., Thiel, A., Tröltzsch, J., & Vidaurre, R. (2020). Enhancing the capacity of water governance to deal with complex management challenges: A framework of analysis. Environmental Science and Policy, 107, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.011
Pambudi, A. S., Junaidi, R., Pramujo, B., Perencanaan, B., Nasional, P., Rasuna, J. H. R., & Jakarta, S. (2023). Conservation strategies for reducing erosion in the upper brantas watershed, Jawa Timur. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan Daerah (JKPD), 7(2), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.56945/jkpd.v7i2.257
Pascucci, S. (2025). Theorizing polycentric governance of global socio-ecological challenges through a meso-institutional perspective. Journal of Institutional Economics, 21, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137425100325
Purwanto, Franklin, E. C., White, A., & Mardiani, S. R. (2023). Multiple-goal bioeconomic programming to address conflicting management objectives in Indonesian small pelagic fisheries. Marine Policy, 150, 105519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105519
Ramcilovic-Suominen, S. (2023). Envisioning just transformations in and beyond the EU bioeconomy: inspirations from decolonial environmental justice and degrowth. Sustainability Science, 18(2), 707–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01091-5
Rifai, R. M., Ameril, C., Mukhid, B., & Ramadani, F. (2026). Growth-response variation among selected coliform isolates under antibiotic stress in the Brantas River, East Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 27(6). https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d270615.
Rina, R., Soegianto, A., Eko, F., Rahma, C., Dwyta, A., Indradewi, N., Prasetyo, E., & Melissa, C. (2026). Chemosphere the spatial distribution of microplastics in correlation with water quality parameters from the upstream to the downstream of the longest river in East Java, Indonesia. Chemosphere, 409, 144998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2026.144998
Rizky, R., & Rahayu, M. I. F. (2025). Efektivitas pengawasan pemerintah daerah terhadap kualitas air sungai: Studi kasus pencemaran sungai Brantas Jawa Timur. USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 6(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.46773/usrah.v6i2.2123
Sidjabat, F. N., Alwi, V., & Puspitasari, Y. (2020). Measuring of lead in river water and local bioindicators in Brantas River Kediri City, East Java Province. Jurnal Ekologi Kesehatan, 19(3), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.22435/jek.v19i3.3459
Sipahutar, L., Tri Budi Prayogo, & Emma Yuliani. (2025). Investigasi tingkat pencemaran daerah aliran sungai brantas akibat aktivitas agrikultur serta perubahan musim di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Rekayasa Sumber Daya Air, 5(1), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jtresda.2025.005.01.039
Sulistiyowati, E., & Uyun, S. (2022). The evaluation of a website for participatory water quality monitoring of rivers in Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Engineering (ICSE-UIN-SUKA 2021), 211, 112–115. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.211222.018
World Meteorological Organization. (2021). Weather-related disasters increase over past 50 years, causing more damage but fewer deaths-World Meteorological Organization. World Meteorological Organization (WMO).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Apnil Hidayah Sukria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
