Tata kelola lingkungan berkelanjutan sebagai implementasi kebijakan pertahanan negara
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jcreco.v1i2.1329Keywords:
lingkungan berkelanjutan, pertahanan negara, tata kelolaAbstract
Latar Belakang: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan tata kelola lingkungan perkotaan dan permukiman, terutama bagi masyarakat yang tinggai di sekitar atau bantaran sungai dan danau. Tata kelola ini diperlukan untuk mencapai tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan nomor 11 sekaligus mencegah dampak negatif dan risiko yang kemungkinan timbul. Metode: Selain didukung dengan kepustakaan yang memadai, penelitian ini secara metodologis juga dikerjakan dengan wawancara mendalam dengan para ahli lingkungan. Dalam upaya memberikan solusi alternatif atas tawaran tersebut, penelitian ini merumuskan keputusan yang diolah dengan metode analytical hierarchy process dengan mempertimbangkan hasil diskusi bersama para ahli lingkungan dan tata kelola perkotaan melalui focus group discussion. Temuan: Penelitian ini mendapati bahwa mencapai tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan tentang kota dan permukiman adalah tanggung jawab yang harus dilakukan dengan tetap memperhatikan sisi kemanusiaan dan keseimbangan lingkungan. Oleh karenanya, dibutuhkan rumusan kebijakan publik yang mendasarkan desain sistem perkotaan dan permukiman yang kuat, aman, bersih, layak huni, dan tangguh. Kesimpulan: Penelitian ini berkesimpulan bahwa penataan lingkungan tempat tinggal harus didasarkan pertimbangan keamanan nasional karena lingkungan juga terkait dengan keamanan nasional. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas artikel ini: Penelitian ini mengintegrasikan tata kelola lingkungan dengan persoalan ketahanan negara sebagai dua hal yang tidak terpisahkan.
References
Aslan, Ş., Diken, A., & Şendoğdu, A. A. (2011). Investigation of the Effects of Strategic Leadership on Strategic Change and Innovativeness of SMEs in a Perceived Environmental Uncertainity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 627–642. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.009.
Babuna, P., Yang, X., Tulcan, R. X. S., Dehui, B., Takase, M., Guba, B. Y., Han, C., Awudi, D. A., & Li, M. (2023). Modeling water inequality and water security: The role of water governance. Journal of Environmental Management, 326, 116815. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116815.
Baldwin, E., Thiel, A., McGinnis, M., & Kellner, E. (2023). Empirical research on polycentric governance: Critical gaps and a framework for studying long-term change. Policy Studies Journal, November 2022, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12518.
Bell, A., & Mallinson, D. J. (2021). Constraints on policy learning: designing the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative in Pennsylvania. Policy Design and Practice, 4(4), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1928970.
Casadei, E., & Albert, J. (2016). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. In B. Caballero, P. M. Finglas, & F. Toldrá (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Food and Health (pp. 749–753). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00270-1.
Clement, J., Ruysschaert, B., & Crutzen, N. (2023). Smart city strategies – A driver for the localization of the sustainable development goals? Ecological Economics, 213, 107941. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107941.
de Jong, W. A., de Kleijn, R. A. M., Lockhorst, D., Brouwer, J., Noordegraaf, M., & van Tartwijk, J. W. F. (2023). Collaborative spirit: Understanding distributed leadership practices in and around teacher teams. Teaching and Teacher Education, 123, 103977. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103977.
Duggan, D. E., & Kochen, M. (2016). Small in scale but big in potential: Opportunities and challenges for fisheries certification of Indonesian small-scale tuna fisheries. Marine Policy, 67, 30–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.01.008.
Farrukh, M. U., Bashir, M. K., Rola-Rubzen, M. F., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Dynamic effects of urbanization, governance, and worker’s remittance on multidimensional food security: An application of a broad-spectrum approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 84, 101400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101400.
Gao, L., Zhou, F., Gong, W., & Pang, X. (2023). The mutual influence of land-sea ecological security and its coordinated governance in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao greater bay area. Ecological Indicators, 156, 111073. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111073.
Greenland, S. J., Saleem, M., Misra, R., Nguyen, N., & Mason, J. (2023). Reducing SDG complexity and informing environmental management education via an empirical six-dimensional model of sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Management, 344, 118328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118328.
Jahanger, A., Ogwu, S. O., Onwe, J. C., & Awan, A. (2023). The prominence of technological innovation and renewable energy for the ecological sustainability in top SDGs nations: Insights from the load capacity factor. Gondwana Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.05.021.
Jamero, M. L., Onuki, M., Esteban, M., Chadwick, C., Tan, N., Valenzuela, V. P., Crichton, R., & Avelino, J. E. (2019). In-situ adaptation against climate change can enable relocation of impoverished small islands. Marine Policy, 108, 103614. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103614.
Jati, W. R. (2023). he Effect of Migration on the Domestic Job Market: Evidence from Australia. Populasi, 31(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.84377.
Karouzakis, N., & Tzioumis, K. (2021). Spillover costs of national security policies. Annals of Tourism Research, 88, 103033. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.103033.
Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Buku Putih Pertahanan Indonesia 2015 Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia.
Keränen, A., Malmi, K., Nätti, S., & Ulkuniemi, P. (2023). Developing identity of conscientious business-to-business organizations through integrative leadership. Industrial Marketing Management, 109, 188–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.01.007.
Khan, N., Ahmed, J., Nawaz, M., & Zaman, K. (2015). The Socio-Economic Determinants of Crime in Pakistan: New Evidence on an Old Debate. Arab Economic and Business Journal, 10(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aebj.2015.01.001.
Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., & Kajanus, M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis — a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(99)00004-0.
Lanshina, T., Barinova, V., Loginova, A., Lavrovskii, E., & Ponedelnik, I. (2019). Localizing and achieving the sustainable development goals at the national level: Cases of leadership. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 8(1), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2019-01-12.
Liu, M., Feng, X., Zhao, Y., & Qiu, H. (2023). Impact of poverty alleviation through relocation: From the perspectives of income and multidimensional poverty. Journal of Rural Studies, 99, 35–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.02.009.
Mohammadi, K. (2023). Improved strategy management for WDNs: Integrated prioritization SWOT QSPM (IPSQ) method – Application to passive defense. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 88, 101663. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101663.
Mohammed, A. F., & Baiee, W. R. (2020). Analysis of Criminal Spatial Events in GIS for predicting hotspots. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 928(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/928/3/032071.
Mortati, M., Mullagh, L., & Schmidt, S. (2022). Design-led policy and governance in practice: a global perspective. Policy Design and Practice, 5(4), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2152592.
Nuralina, K., Baizholova, R., Aleksandrova, N., Konstantinov, V., & Biryukov, A. (2023). Socio-economic development of countries based on the Composite country Development Index (CCDI). Regional Sustainability, 4(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2023.03.005.
Roldán-Valcarce, A., Jato-Espino, D., Manchado, C., Bach, P. M., & Kuller, M. (2023). Vulnerability to urban flooding assessed based on spatial demographic, socio-economic and infrastructure inequalities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 95(July), 103894. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103894.
Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3), 161–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
Sánchez-Rivero, M. V., Bote Alonso, I., Domínguez Serrano, M. V., & Montalbán Pozas, B. (2023). SDG monitoring framework for rural settlements mapping interactions with the Spanish Urban Agenda. Sustainable Cities and Society, 93, 104514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104514.
Sanphillippo, J. (2022). Chapter 35 - VUCA: volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity in our smart city and tech finance future. In J. R.Vacca (Ed.), Smart Cities Policies and Financing (pp. 511–521). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819130-9.00055-3.
Schroeder, W. A. (2023). A Future US Defense Program in an Era of Great Power Competition. Orbis, 67(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2022.12.009.
Strating, R., & Wallis, J. (2022). Maritime sovereignty and territorialisation: Comparing the Pacific Islands and South China Sea. Marine Policy, 141, 105110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105110.
Tian, Z., Wang, Q., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2023). Comparison of the tourist mobility patterns among demographic subgroups with mobile phone data: A case study of Chongqing, China. Applied Geography, 159, 103090. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103090.
United Nations Development Programme, U. (2017). RAPID INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT ( RIA ) To facilitate mainstreaming of SDGs.
Visvizi, A., & del Hoyo, R. P. (2021). Chapter 1 - Sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the smart city: A tool or an approach? (An introduction). In A. Visvizi & R. Pérez del Hoyo (Eds.), Smart Cities and the un SDGs (pp. 1–11). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85151-0.00001-4.
Zeng, Q., He, Z., & Zeng, Y. (2023). Public procurement, consumers’ preference and poverty alleviation through consumption. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 87, 101514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101514.
