Courtyards for consumption: Tourist constructions of authenticity in the commodified Chinese courtyard buildings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jcbau.v4i1.2026.3974Keywords:
Chinatown, city branding, commodification, courtyard, urban authenticityAbstract
Background: The interior courtyard is the organising socio-spatial core of Chinese and Chinese-Indonesian (Peranakan) domestic architecture, yet in heritage-tourism districts it is increasingly repackaged as a consumable attraction. In Semarang’s Chinatown (Pecinan), community-led tourism since 2006 and a municipal revitalisation programme launched in 2023 have accelerated the conversion of courtyard buildings into cafés, cultural venues, and visitor attractions. Drawing on the staged-authenticity debate and on recent studies of courtyard commodification in East Asian cities, this study examines how visitors construct, negotiate, and contest the authenticity of commodified courtyard spaces in Pecinan Semarang, and what their narratives imply for the district’s brand. Methods: A netnographic design analyses publicly available Google Maps reviews of three courtyard-based heritage venues: Tay Kak Sie Grand Temple, the Rasa Dharma hall of Boen Hian Tong, and Dharma Boutique Roastery, coded deductively against a framework that crosses objective, constructive, and existential authenticity with spatial, social, and symbolic dimensions of place, complemented by inductive open coding. Findings: Preliminary coding of a purposive sample of 32 reviews indicates that objective (age-based) judgements and commodification signals co-dominate (41% each), existential encounters follow (34%), and the courtyard itself is explicitly named in only 6% of reviews — consumed as café seating and event space but absent from visitors’ vocabulary. Commodification is narrated overwhelmingly as access rather than loss, except where consumption enters sacred space; an emergent code of everyday communal use marks the association hall as a living institution rather than an attraction. Conclusion: The study provisionally identifies the “consumed but unnamed” courtyard and everyday communal use as overlooked authenticity resources for heritage-district branding in island Southeast Asia. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study extends authenticity research by introducing the concept of the "consumed but unnamed" courtyard and demonstrating how everyday communal use functions as an overlooked authenticity resource that reshapes heritage branding in commodified courtyard spaces.
References
Akkaya, M., Özçevik, Ö., & Tepe, E. (2024). A machine learning application to Google Maps reviews as a participatory planning tool. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 28(3), 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2024.2320916
Anggraini, L. D. (2012). Spatial arrangement in Chinese and Javanese shop houses in Yogyakarta City. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 557–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.061
Chan, S. H. G., Lee, W. H. H., Tang, B. M., & Chen, Z. (2024). Legacy of culture heritage building revitalization: Place attachment and culture identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1314223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1314223
Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(88)90028-X
Fang, K., & Wu, Y. (2025). The importance of integrating historic context and activities into heritage district: Enhancing attraction and vitality. npj Heritage Science, 13, Article 434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-01862-0
Februandari, A. (2020). Authenticity in cultural built heritage: Learning from Chinese Indonesians’ houses. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 38(2), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-02-2019-0017
Februandari, A. (2026). We are Indonesian: The surveillance system of Semarang Chinatown in the formation of Chinese Indonesian passable identities. Space and Culture. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312261427914
Gönüllüoğlu, S., & Arslan Selçuk, S. (2025). City branding in the context of architecture, tourism, culture, and cultural identity interaction—Bibliometric analysis of literature. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 21(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-024-00365-2
González Martínez, P. (2016). Authenticity as a challenge in the transformation of Beijing’s urban heritage: The commercial gentrification of the Guozijian historic area. Cities, 59, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.026
Good News From Indonesia. (2023, March 9). Menikmati kopi dan kisahnya di Dharma Boutique Roastery, penyangraian kopi tertua Semarang. https://www.goodnewsfromindonesia.id/2023/03/09/dharma-boutique-roastery-semarang
Hu, Y., Meng, Q., Li, M., & Yang, D. (2024). Enhancing authenticity in historic districts via soundscape design. Heritage Science, 12, Article 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01515-8
Kavaratzis, M., & Ashworth, G. J. (2005). City branding: An effective assertion of identity or a transitory marketing trick? Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(5), 506–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00482.x
Kompas. (2024, February 2). Dukung revitalisasi kawasan Pecinan Semarang, Kopi Semawis minta revitalisasi perhatikan keamanan konstruksi jalan. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2024/02/02/122724978/
Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research. SAGE Publications.
Lestari, S., Sari, S. R., & Rukayah, R. S. (2021). Karakter visual Gang Gambiran kawasan Pecinan, Semarang. Jurnal Arsitektur ARCADE, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31848/arcade.v5i1.594
MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1086/225585
Murianews. (2022, February 5). Mengenang Gus Dur di Boen Hian Tong. https://www.murianews.com/2022/02/05/270326/mengenang-gus-dur-di-boen-hian-tong
Nursanty, E., Cauba, A. G., & Waskito, A. P. (2024). Vernacular branding: Sustaining city identity through vernacular architecture of indigenous villages. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 20(4), 482–503. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-024-00349-2
Quang, T. D., Dang Vo, N. M., Van Nguyen, H., Thi Nguyen, Q. X., Ting, H., & Vo-Thanh, T. (2024). Understanding tourists’ experiences at war heritage sites in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: A netnographic analysis of TripAdvisor reviews. Leisure Studies, 43(4), 624–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2023.2249252
Quang, T. D., Noseworthy, W. B., & Paulson, D. (2022). Rising tensions: Heritage-tourism development and the commodification of “authentic” culture among the Cham community of Vietnam. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), Article 2116161. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2116161
Safitri, R. A., Subroto, T. Y. W., & Rahmi, D. H. (2025). Adaptability of Siheyuan (四合院) spatial arrangement in Chinese houses in Kampung Ketandan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Built Heritage, 9, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00166-9
Saleem, S., & Umar, R. M. (2023). A netnography study on memorable cultural tourism experiences: Insights from Asian cultural heritage site tourists. Journal of Promotion Management, 29(2), 280–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2022.2143990
Tao, Y., Jiang, Y., Huang, M., & Zhou, K. (2025). Exploring visitor perception of Asian historic districts through deep learning and social media data. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 25(4), 2994–3013. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2025.2517909
Wang, N. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(2), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(98)00103-0
Widiastuti, R., Rahmat, A., & Aseani, W. (2015). Conservation and revitalitation in Semarang Chinatown (Klenteng “Chinese shrine” as physical characteristic in Semarang Chinatown). Procedia Environmental Sciences, 28, 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.065
Xia, L., Shi, C., Wang, H., Yu, S., Yi, X., & Liu, Y. (2025). Aligning online images and realities beyond the hype for sustainable heritage tourism. npj Heritage Science, 13, Article 268. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-02208-6
Yang, K., & Liu, J. (2025). Sustainable development strategies for culture–tourism integration in the historic district of Tianzifang, Shanghai. Buildings, 15(19), Article 3480. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15193480
Yuliati, D., Susilowati, E., & Suliyati, T. (2023). Preservation of the Old City of Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, and its development as a cultural tourism asset. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), Article 2170740. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2170740
Zhang, D. (2017). Courtyard housing in China: Chinese quest for harmony. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 1(2), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2017.3647
Zhao, S., Marzuki, A., Rong, W., & Ran, X. (2024). An empirical application of the consumer-based authenticity model in heritage tourism of the George Town historic district, Penang, Malaysia. Heliyon, 10(18), Article e38254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38254
Zhu, L., & Yang, S. (2025). Folding courtyard: Layered evolution and micro renovation of the compound courtyard house in the southern inner city of Nanjing, China. The Journal of Architecture, 30(2), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2025.2550587
Zukin, S. (2010). Naked city: The death and life of authentic urban places. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wawan Destiawan, Djudjun Rusmiatmoko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
