Kudus Kulon as a living heritage site: The dialectics of heritage preservation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jcbau.v4i1.2026.3917Keywords:
intangible heritage, living heritage, space production, tangible heritageAbstract
Background: This study aims to determine the characteristics of continuity in the Kudus Kulon living heritage site. Furthermore, this study seeks to explain the process of cultural heritage preservation through the lens of spatial production, which involves the collaboration of various actors. This research is expected to provide deeper understanding of studies on living heritage and spatial production, as well as provide practical contributions to strengthening community-based preservation strategies in living heritage site. Methods: This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study strategy to understand cultural heritage preservation in Kudus Kulon as a living heritage site. Data were obtained through field observations, in-depth interviews, and documentation studies, then analyzed thematically using the living heritage framework and Lefebvre's theory of spatial production. The analysis was conducted to identify forms of continuity, community practices, and the reproduction of spatial meaning in the cultural heritage preservation process. Findings: These research findings confirm and enrich the Western concept of living heritage by highlighting the continuity of original functions, transformation, the involvement of core communities, and sustained adaptability. The Sunan Kudus Heritage site, the traditional Joglo Pencu house, and the Buka Luwur and Dandangan traditions demonstrate that heritage remains alive not by being frozen in time, but through continuous use, maintenance, and reinterpretation by the community and local foundations. In this context, social change and institutional adjustments do not weaken the heritage; rather, they become integral to the sustainability strategy of the heritage space. Conclusion: Kudus Kulon demonstrates its capacity as a dialectical space of living heritage, where continuity and change do not negate each other, but rather complement each other within a unique and contextual framework of socio-spatial relations. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study offers a novel contribution by integrating the "living heritage" perspective and Lefebvre’s theory of the production of space to interpret cultural heritage preservation as a dialectical socio-spatial process.
References
Araoz, G. F. (2011). Preserving heritage places under a new paradigm. Journal of cultural heritage management and sustainable development, 1(1), 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/20441261111129933
Ashadi, A. (2019). Kudus Kota Suci di Jawa. Arsitektur UMJ Press.
Boisen, M., Terlouw, K., & van Gorp, B. (2011). The selective nature of place branding and the layering of spatial identities. Journal of Place Management and Development, 4(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538331111153151
Chirikure, S., Manyanga, M., Ndoro, W., & Pwiti, G. (2010). Unfulfilled promises? Heritage management and community participation at some of Africa’s cultural heritage sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1–2), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441739
Espín-León, A., Jimeno-Morenilla, A., Pertegal-Felices, M. L., & Azorín-López, J. (2020). Quantification of cultural identity through artificial intelligence: A case study on the Waorani Amazonian ethnicity. Soft Computing, 24(15), 11045–11057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04469-3
Gaya, H., & Smith, E. E. (2016). Developing a Qualitative Single Case Study in the Strategic Management Realm: An Appropriate Research Design? International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 7(2), 529–538. https://www.ijbmer.com/volumes/vol7issue2/ijbmer2016
Insch, A., & Walters, T. (2018). Challenging assumptions about residents’ engagement with place branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 14(3), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-017-0067-5
Poulios, I. (2014). The past in the present: A living heritage approach-Meteora, Greece (p. 180). Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bak
Ioannis Poulios, & Poulios, I. (2014). Discussing strategy in heritage conservation: Living heritage approach as an example of strategic innovation. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-10-2012-0048
Kavaratzis, M., & Kalandides, A. (2015). Rethinking the place brand: The interactive formation of place brands and the role of participatory place branding. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 47(6), 1368–1382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15594918
Lefebvre, H. (2012). From the production of space. In Theatre and performance design (pp. 81–84). Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/9780203124291-13
Lefebvre, H. (2014). The Production of Space (1991). In The People, Place, and Space Reader. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/production-space-1991-henri-lefebvre
Ma, J., & Wu, Z. (2026). Platformized Tourism Circuits and Urban Space: Xiaohongshu, Wanghong Places, and Dongshankou’s Transformation. Journal of Travel Research, 00472875251408445. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875251408445
Malpas, J. (2012). Putting Space in Place: Philosophical Topography and Relational Geography. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1068/d20810
Miura, K. (2005). Conservation of a ‘living heritage site’ A contradiction in terms? A case study of Angkor World Heritage Site. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 7(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1179/135050305793137602
Munasinghe, H. (2022). Proclaiming Colonial Urban Heritage: Towards an Inclusive Heritage-interpretation for Colombo’s Past. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2022.v6n1-1
Peng, J., Strijker, D., & Wu, Q. (2020). Place Identity: How Far Have We Come in Exploring Its Meanings? Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00294
Philippot, P. (1996). Historic Preservation: Philosophy, Criteria, Guidelines, I, II “Historical and Philosophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage. https://www.getty.edu/conservation/books/issueinconservationculturalheritage
Soja, E. W. (1980). The Socio-Spatial Dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980
Song, M., & Kim, J.-E. (2025). The sustainablility of traditional Chinese villages: A perspective from the production of space. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1635374
Sully, D., Ward, M., & Loizeau, J. (2023). Putting the Illegal into heritage practice. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 29(12), 1374–1390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2263760
Tournois, L., & Rollero, C. (2020). “Should I stay or should I go?” Exploring the influence of individual factors on attachment, identity and commitment in a post-socialist city. Cities, 102, 102740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102740
Tsang, E. W. (2013). Case study methodology: Causal explanation, contextualization, and theorizing. Journal of international management, 19(2), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2012.08.004
Wang, Y., Hu, W., & Liu, X. (2026). Production of space in rural China: Village revitalization and cultural landscape transformation in Chongqing, China. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 25(3), 1912–1927. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2025.2493098
Wijesuriya, G. (2016). Conserving living Taonga: The concept of continuity. In Decolonizing Conservation (1st ed., p. 13). Routledge.
Wu, Z., Ma, J., & Zhang, H. (2023). Spatial Reconstruction and Cultural Practice of Linear Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of Meiguan Historical Trail, Guangdong, China. Buildings, 13(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010105
Wulandari, A., Suprapti, A., & Sardjono, A. B. (2024). Cultural continuity and change in Kudus Kulon: The urban heritage trialogue. Journal of City: Branding and Authenticity, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.61511/jcbau.v1i2.2024.397
Wulandari, A., Suprapti, A., & Sardjono, A. B. (2025). The living heritage site Kudus Kulon: A case study on muslim community and cultural continuity in Indonesia. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 21(4). http://ejournal.ukm.my/gmjss/article/view/88962
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Sixth edition). SAGE.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Astari Wulandari, Atik Suprapti, Agung Budi Sardjono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
