Layers of authenticity: Tracing multicultural narratives in the goethe-institut building as a symbol of urban branding in yangon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jcbau.v2i2.2025.1422Keywords:
adaptive reuse, architectural authenticity, heritage conservation, multicultural architecture, sustainable urban developmentAbstract
Background: This study investigates the Goethe-Institut building in Yangon, Myanmar, highlighting its significance as a case of adaptive reuse and heritage conservation. Constructed in the 1920s during British colonial rule, the building showcases a blend of architectural styles, merging colonial engineering with Burmese, Chinese, and Indian design elements. Over the years, it has transitioned from a private residence to a revolutionary headquarters, an art school, and now serves as a cultural hub. Methods: This study examines the Goethe-Institut building in Yangon, Myanmar, through site observations, historical analysis, and a literature review, focusing on its architectural significance and role in heritage conservation. Findings: The research delves into the building's historical evolution and architectural features while addressing the challenges of adaptive reuse within urban heritage conservation. It emphasizes how these strategies have preserved historical authenticity while meeting contemporary needs and sustainability goals. Key elements such as high ceilings, wide verandas, and intricate carvings are analyzed for their cultural significance. By comparing similar projects across Southeast Asia, the study illustrates the potential of heritage conservation to enhance cultural identity and community engagement. It argues that the Goethe-Institut exemplifies the transformative power of adaptive reuse in preserving architectural heritage, offering insights for sustainable urban development and postcolonial narratives. Conclusion: The findings underscore the importance of integrating historical context with modern functionality to foster resilience in urban environments. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study provides a unique contribution by analyzing the Goethe-Institut building in Yangon as a case of adaptive reuse, highlighting its role in preserving architectural heritage while addressing contemporary sustainability challenges, and offering comparative insights from similar projects across Southeast Asia.
References
Abercrombie, P., & Lim, J. (2020). Passive cooling strategies in colonial tropical architecture: A case study approach. Tropical Architecture Journal, 8(2), 45–64.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
Department of Archaeology, Myanmar. (2019). Heritage restoration guidelines: A focus on colonial Yangon. Ministry of Culture, Myanmar.
Foster, R., & Smith, K. (2020). Climate-conscious conservation: Using heritage as a sustainability tool. Environmental Architecture Review, 15(2), 33–57.
Gupta, R. (2019). Cultural revival through adaptive reuse: The case of Yangon’s Goethe-Institut. Asian Heritage Journal, 5(3), 23–45.
Henderson, J. C. (2018). Colonial heritage in urban development: The case of Southeast Asia. Tourism Studies Review, 13(4), 89–105.
Henderson, J. C., & Vann, S. (2016). Multicultural legacies in colonial urban design. Urban History Review, 10(4), 89–105.
ICOMOS. (2019). The ICOMOS charter for the interpretation and presentation of cultural heritage sites. International Council on Monuments and Sites.
Kumar, V., & Prasad, R. (2020). Integrating jali patterns into contemporary architecture. Journal of Indian Design, 12(1), 78–91.
Leoussi, A. S., & Abernethy, D. (2017). Colonial influences in Southeast Asian architecture. Architectural Histories, 5(4), 112–130.
Myint, T. (2018). Colonial Yangon: Evolution of urban identity. Historical Urban Studies, 7(2), 45–60.
Ng, C. (2017). The crossroads of architecture: Multicultural design in Southeast Asian cities. Architecture Today, 8(4), 51–77.
Penang Heritage Trust. (2018). Adaptive reuse and heritage conservation in Southeast Asia. Penang Heritage Publications.
Scholz, T. (2015). Burmese craftsmanship and its impact on heritage conservation. Myanmar Heritage Review, 4(1), 33–50.
Tan, W. L. (2020). Cultural identity through architectural conservation in Singapore and Malaysia. Comparative Heritage Studies, 11(2), 66–91.
Thompson, J., & Ng, P. (2021). From tradition to sustainability: Lessons from colonial adaptive reuse projects. Journal of Global Architectural Studies, 16(3), 110–139.
UNESCO. (2020). Urban heritage in Southeast Asia: Challenges and strategies. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
World Monuments Fund. (2020). Preserving the past, building the future: Heritage sites in developing cities. WMF Publications.
Yang, X., & Lee, C. (2021). Sustainable practices in heritage building preservation: Lessons from Southeast Asia. Journal of Sustainable Architecture, 14(5), 92–109.
Yangon Heritage Trust. (n.d.). A guide to Yangon’s historical sites.
Zaw, K. (2021). Chinese influences in colonial Burmese architecture. Journal of Asian Cultural Studies, 9(3), 101–119.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of City: Branding and Authenticity
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
