The voice of #SaveRajaAmpat: Digital movements against nickel mining
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/environc.v2i2.2025.3134Keywords:
digital movement, environment, greenpeace, nickel, Raja AmpatAbstract
Background: The movement to against nickel mining in Raja Ampat was raised in early July 2025. The movement began with a post from Greenpeace Indonesia who were kicked out by security personnels when they protested against nickel mining in Raja Ampat in the middle of an event attended by industry professionals, government officials, experts, and representatives from various countries. This resulted in the digital community joining in to voice their opposition to Raja Ampat with the hashtag #SaveRajaAmpat. This research presents the circumstances that led the digital community to engage in the #SaveRajaAmpat campaign on social media and examines the effectiveness of social media campaigns. Methods: Using qualitative methods with a netnographic approach. The author used secondary data from Greenpeace Indonesia, organizational documents, news articles, and posts by X accounts about Raja Ampat. Findings: The digital community against nickel mining in Raja Ampat due to environmental concerns; frustration and disappointment with the state, government & oligarchy; Solidarity with the Papuan people; a spirit of resistance towards capitalism and a desire for tourism & to enjoy the natural beauty of Raja Ampat. However, the movement on social media was short-lived and faded due to minor victories achieved through the revocation of several companies permits and distraction by other issues. Conclusion: Social movement through social media are less effective, therefore it is necessary to unite social media movements and direct action with the spirit of disappointment towards the state and a spirit of resistance against capitalism so that the movement can be sustained. Novelty/Originality of this article: This change explains the various motivations of the digital community to engage in activism and explains why digital movements are less effective.
References
Agustin, S., Claudia, R., & Aditia, R. (2025). The effectiveness of climate crisis representation in the ‘Save the Arctic’ campaign through a linguistic semiotics approach. Linguistics Initiative, 5(2), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.52335
Ang, J. S., Hsu, C., Tang, D., & Wu, C. (2021). The role of social media in corporate governance. The Accounting Review, 96(2), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2018-0144
Aspinall, E., & Mayangsari, F. (2025). 11 Civic space, protest and repression: The end of the reformasi coalition. dalam Jaffrey, S & Warburton E. (Ed.). The Jokowi Presidency: Indonesia’s Decade of Authoritarian Revival, (hlm. 207 – 229). ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute
Baek, T. H., Kim, S., Yoon, S., Choi, Y. K., Choi, D., & Bang, H. (2022). Emojis and assertive environmental messages in social media campaigns. Internet Research, 32, 988–1002. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-11-2020-0638
Barrowcliffe, R. (2021). Closing the narrative gap: social media as a tool to reconcile institutional archival narratives with Indigenous counter-narratives. Archives and Manuscripts, 49(3), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2021.1883074
Bartzas, G., Tsakiridis, P. E., & Komnitsas, K. (2021). Nickel industry: Heavy metal (loid) s contamination-sources, environmental impacts and recent advances on waste valorization. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 21, 100253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100253
BPS (2025). Profil Kemiskinan di Indonesia September 2024. BPS
Chairullah, E. (2022). Indonesia’s Failure in Papua: The Role of Elites in Designing, Implementing and Undermining Special Autonomy. Routledge.
Chou, E. Y., Hsu, D. Y., & Hernon, E. (2020). From slacktivism to activism: Improving the commitment power of e-pledges for prosocial causes. PloS one, 15(4), e0231314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231314
Cooper, K. (2023). The effectiveness of online activism: Who it is effective for, what issues it is effective for, and what time period it is effective for. Political Science. 42. https://doi.org/10.54014/3N5F-BX9D
Daimah. (2025). The Cyber Footprint of Digital Activism: The Legal Boundary between Freedom of Expression and Hate Speech in Indonesia. Indonesian Cyber Law Review 2(1), 20 – 29. https://doi.org/10.59261/iclr.v2i1.13
Della Porta, D. (2020). How Social Movements Can Save Democracy: Democratic Innovations from Below. Polity Press
Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2020). Social movements: An introduction (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell
Doyle, J. (2007). Picturing the Clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the Representational Politics of Climate Change Communication. Science as Culture, 16(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430701368938
Evans, W. D., Abroms, L. C., Broniatowski, D., Napolitano, M. A., Arnold, J., Ichimiya, M., & Agha, S. (2022). Digital Media for Behavior Change: Review of an Emerging Field of Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9129. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159129
Geurts, S., B. Kuepper and P. Boev (2025). The Destructive Indonesian Nickel Supply Chain - A supply chain mapping & risk assessment. Amsterdam: Profundo.
Greenpeace Indonesia. (2025). Surga yang Hilang? Bagaimana Pertambangan Nikel Mengancam Masa Depan Salah Satu Kawasan Konservasi Paling Penting di Dunia. Greenpeace Indonesia
Hadiz, V. R., & Robison, R. (2004). Reorganising power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. Routledge
Hannany, Z & Priambodo, D. (2025, 02 Mei). World Bank: Last year 60.3% of Indonesians classified as poor. IDN Financials https://www.idnfinancials.com/news/54230/world-bank-last-year-60-3-of-indonesians-classified-as-poor
Henckens, T. (2024). Electric Cars and the Resource Challenge. Routledge.
Javed, M. S., Safyan, M., & Manzoor, A. (2025). Literature and Media: A Study of the Role of Literary Criticism in Shaping Communication in the Digital Age. AL-ĪMĀN Research Journal, 3(02), 16-36.
Karsadi, K., & Aso, L. (2023). Multidimensional impacts of nickel mining exploitation towards the lives of the local community. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 12(2), 222-227. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v12i2.58881
Kozinets, R. V., & Seraj-Aksit, M. (2024). Everyday activism: an AI-assisted netnography of a digital consumer movement. Journal of Marketing Management, 40(3-4), 347-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2024.2307387
Kristofferson, K., White, K., & Peloza, J. (2014). The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1149-1166. https://doi.org/10.1086/674137
Kumar, N., Qiu, L., & Kumar, S. (2022). A hashtag is worth a thousand words: An empirical investigation of social media strategies in trademarking hashtags. Information Systems Research, 33(4), 1403-1427. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1107
Lawson, H. A. (2020, 09 April). How online activism has changed the world. Greenpeace UK, https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/news/online-activism-how-petitions-and-social-media-campaigns-have-changed-the-world/
Li, Y., Bernard, J. G., & Luczak-Roesch, M. (2021). Beyond clicktivism: What makes digitally native activism effective? An exploration of the sleeping giants movement. Social media+ society, 7(3), 20563051211035357. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211035357
Leonel, R., Rehbein, K., Westermann‐Behaylo, M., & Perrault, E. (2024). Firms’ Response to Slacktivism: When and Why are E‐Petitions Effective?. Journal of Management Studies, 61(7), 3148-3183. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13010
Levická, J., & Orliková, M. (2024). The toxic legacy of nickel production and its impact on environmental health: a case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(12), 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121641
Lorenz, C., de Oliveira Lage, M., & Chiaravalloti-Neto, F. (2021). Deforestation hotspots, climate crisis, and the perfect scenario for the next epidemic: The Amazon time bomb. Science of the Total Environment, 783, 147090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147090
Magdoff, F. & Foster, J.B. (2011). What Every Environmentalist Needs to Know About Capitalism: A Citizen's Guide to Capitalism and the Environment. Montly Review Press
Martoredjo, N. T. (2023). Social media as a learning tool in the digital age: A review. Procedia Computer Science, 227, 534-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.555
Marx, P. (2022). Road to nowhere: what Silicon Valley gets wrong about the future of transportation. Verso Books.
Maryam, S., Prasetyo, P., & Mahdalena, V. (2021). Literasi media digital pada kampanye Greenpeace Id di media sosial Instagram dalam merubah perilaku masyarakat. Ikra-Ith Humaniora: Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5(1), 1-12.
Mietzner, M. (2019). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1704266
Morozov, E. (2009). From slacktivism to activism. Foreign policy.
Muncie, E. C. (2024). Campaigning for the Future and the Future of Campaigning: A Case of Greenpeace International and the Emergence of New Environmental Communication Landscapes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester).
Novianty, S. M., Wijayanti, S., & Muamar, J. (2023). Ethical Discourse of Doxing in Indonesian Twitter Users. Jurnal InterAct, 12(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.25170/interact.v12i1.4134
Pandit, M., Magadum, T., Mittal, H., & Kushwaha, O. (2025). Digital Natives, Digital Activists: Youth, Social Media and the Rise of Environmental Sustainability Movements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10158. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.10158
Park, K., & Rim, H. (2020). “Click First!”: The Effects of Instant Activism Via a Hoax on Social Media. Social Media+ Society, 6(2), 2056305120904706. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120904706
Patrick, P. A., Obermeyer, I., Xenakis, J., Crocitto, D., & O'Hara, D. M. (2020). Technology and social media use by adult patients with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities. Disability and health journal, 13(1), 100840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.100840
Safenet. (2025). Laporan Tahunan SAFEnet 2024: Menyalakan Energi di Tengah Represi. Southeast Asia Freedom of Expression Network
Setiawan, K. M., & Tomsa, D. (2023). Defending a vulnerable yet resilient democracy: civil society activism in Jokowi's Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 42(3), 350-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034231209058
Shahin, S., & Hou, M. (2025). # StopAsianHate as hashtag activism: Provocateurs, celebrities, and fan practices of collective action against racism. Social Media+ Society, 11(1), 20563051241309701. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241309701
Sharma, A., Gosai, H. G., & Singh, V. (2024). Role of Global Media and Social Media in Raising Environmental Issues. In Environmental Activism and Global Media: Perspective from the Past, Present and Future (pp. 99-115). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55408-7_5
Syahputra, A. (2024). Social and Economic Impact of Industrialization Nickel Mining on The Community (Study of Wonuamorome Village, Konawe Regency). Papsel Journal of Humanities and Policy, 1(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.63185/pjhp.v1i1.7
Tarrow, S. G. (2022). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press
Vu, H. T., Blomberg, M., Seo, H., Liu, Y., Shayesteh, F., & Do, H. V. (2021). Social media and environmental activism: Framing climate change on Facebook by global NGOs. Science communication, 43(1), 91-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971644
White, C. M., Mangubhai, S., Rumetna, L., & Brooks, C. M. (2022). The bridging role of non-governmental organizations in the planning, adoption, and management of the marine protected area network in Raja Ampat, Indonesia. Marine Policy, 141, 105095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105095
Wibawa, S., & Wardana, A. (2022). Coal, Oligarchy, and the Indonesian Environment in the Documentary Film Sexy Killers. In Environment, Media, and Popular Culture in Southeast Asia (pp. 135-149). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1130-9_8
Winters, J. A. (2011) Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press.
Yayasan Tifa. (2023, 17 Februari). Siaran Pers:; Memperluas Aktivisme Digital untuk Hadapi Penyempitan Ruang Sipil di Indonesia. Yayasan tifa. https://www.tifafoundation.id/artikel/siaran-pers-memperluas-aktivisme-digital-untuk-hadapi-penyempitan-ruang-sipil-di-indonesia-2/
Yewen, R & Hartik, A. (2025, 08 Juni). Sejarah Eksplorasi Nikel di Pulau Gag Raja Ampat,Dimulai Belanda pada 1920. Kompas. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2025/06/08/201819078/sejarah-eksplorasi-nikel-di-pulau-gag-raja-ampat-dimulai-belanda-pada-1920?source=sorotan#google_vignette
Yoman, S.S. (2013). Apakah Indonesia Menduduki & Menjajah Bangsa Papua? Tantangan & Harapan Masa Depan Papua dalam Pemaksaan Nasionalisme Keindonesiaan & Imperialisme Kapitalis di Papua. Cenderawasihpress
Zohouri, M., Darvishi, M., & Sarfi, M. (2020). Slacktivism: A critical evaluation. Journal of Cyberspace Studies, 4(2), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.22059/jcss.2020.93911
Zur, H., & Hatuka, T. (2023). Local–digital activism: Place, social media, body, and violence in changing urban politics. Social Media+ Society, 9(2), 20563051231166443. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231166443
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Aminullah Thohir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
