Potensi penurunan konsumsi energi di DKI Jakarta dengan menggunakan rumah ramah lingkungan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/enjust.v1i1.2024.623Keywords:
DKI Jakarta residents; eco-friendly homes; energy consumption.Abstract
Background: With the rapid development of DKI Jakarta, it is estimated that the energy demand will increase. With the current trend of environmentally friendly housing concepts, a decrease in energy consumption is expected if people are willing to switch to eco-friendly homes or use eco-friendly components such as LED lights, water-saving showers, or solar panels. There are several inhibiting factors for people to use eco-friendly homes, including willingness to pay, preferences regarding eco-friendly homes, reluctance towards eco-friendly homes, and environmental awareness. The aim of this research is to understand the understanding, preferences, and reluctance of the public regarding eco-friendly homes, analyze the potential of DKI Jakarta residents to move to eco-friendly homes or their components, and analyze the potential decrease in energy usage in DKI Jakarta through the use of eco-friendly homes and their components. Methods: This research was conducted using a quantitative approach with qualitative and quantitative methods. The analysis method in this study is descriptive analysis and energy consumption reduction potential calculation. Findings: The results of this study show that the majority of DKI Jakarta residents already understand eco-friendly homes and have preferences to move despite some reluctance factors. Conclusion: Moreover, the majority of DKI Jakarta residents (more than 50%) have the potential to use eco-friendly homes and switch to water, electricity, and construction material-saving components. The potential decrease in energy consumption in DKI Jakarta in the future is predicted to reach over 15% if moving to eco-friendly homes altogether and potentially reducing energy needs by more than 15% in water consumption and over 30% in electricity consumption. These results are obtained by combining the desire to move and the potential energy savings from each component.
References
Abraham, P. S., & Gundimeda, H. (2018). Greening offices: Willingness to pay for green- certified office spaces in Bengaluru, India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0265-1
Adams, W. M. (2006). Rethinking sustainability-editor’s introduction. The Future of Sustainability, (January), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4908-0
Aini, D., Farhaini, A., & Putra, B. K. (2023). Community Participation in Improving Health in Remote Areas: A Literature Review. International Journal of Education, Information Technology and Others (IJEIT), 6(2), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7798056
Berawi, M. A., Miraj, P., Windrayani, R., & Berawi, A. R. B. (2019). Stakeholders’ perspectives on green building rating: A case study in Indonesia. Heliyon, 5(3), e01328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01328
BPPT. (2018). OUTLOOK ENERGI INDONESIA 2018. In BPPT. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
ESDM. (2017). Statistik Ketenagalistrikan 2016. https://www.esdm.go.id/assets/media/content/content-statistik-ketenagalistrikan-tahun-2016-1.pdf
Farhaini, A., Putra, B. K., & Aini, D. (2022). Reformasi Birokrasi dalam Pelayanan Publik Melalui Aplikasi Halodoc di Kota Mataram. Professional: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Administrasi Publik, 9(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.37676/professional.v9i1.2416
Karyono, T. H. (2015). Permukiman Tropis Berkonsep Hijau Ramah Lingkungan. (May 2009). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280560986_Eco-settlement_Permukiman_Tropis_Berkonsep_Hijau_Ramah_Lingkungan
Kusmana, D. (2019). Jurnal bangunan hemat energi. (February), 0–17. Negara, Perusahaan Listrik, P. (Persero) P. 2019. (2019). Berapa Konsumsi Listrik Masyarakat Jakarta. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328657276_Analisis_Statistik_Konsumsi_Energi_Listrik_Pada_Bangunan_Gedung_Yayasan_Widya_Dharma_Pontianak
Ningrum, L. T., Permatasari, L., Ussarwan, M. I., Farhaini, A., Aini, D., & Putra, B. K. (2023). Review: Pemanfaatan Tanaman Jahe Sebagai Pengobatan Herbal Untuk Sakit Kepala. BENZENA Pharmaceutical Scientific Journal, 2(2), 55–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.31941/benzena.v2i02.3751
Portnov, B. A., Trop, T., Svechkina, A., Ofek, S., Akron, S., & Ghermandi, A. (2018). Factors affecting homebuyers’ willingness to pay green building price premium: Evidence from a nationwide survey in Israel. Building and Environment, 137, 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.014
Prianto, E. (2007). Rumah Tropis Hemat Energi Bentuk Kepedulian Global Warming. Riptek, 1(1), 1–10. https://bappeda.semarangkota.go.id/uploaded/publikasi/Rumah_Tropis_Hemat_Energi_Bentuk_Kepedulian_Global_Warning_-_EDDI_PRIANTO.pdf
Putra, B. K., Dewi, R. M., Fadilah, Y. H., & Roziqin, A. (2021). Reformasi Birokrasi dalam Pelayanan Publik Melalui Mobile JKN di Kota Malang. Jurnal Ilmiah Publika, 9(1), 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/publika.v9i1.5325
Sa’adawisna, D., & Putra, B. K. (2022). The Effect of the Establishment of a New Autonomous Region on Electoral District Regulations in the 2024 General Election. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(20), 484–493. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7269113
Sa’adawisna, D., & Putra, B. K. (2023). Political Education to Increase Beginner Voter Participation in the 2019 General Elections. Awang Long Law Review, 5(2), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v5i2.716
Sudarwani, M. M. (2012). PENERAPAN GREEN ARCHITECTURE DAN GREEN BUILDING SEBAGAI UPAYA PENCAPAIAN SUSTAINABLE ARCHITECTURE. Jurusan Arsitektur Fakultas Teknik Universitas Pandanaran, Vol 10. https://jurnal.unpand.ac.id/index.php/dinsain/article/view/90
Tanuwidjaja, G., Leonardo, L., Mulyono, A., & Silvanus, D. C. (2013). DESAIN RUMAH HEINZ FRICK YANG RAMAH LINGKUNGAN DAN TERJANGKAU. Journal of Architectural Discourses. https://doi.org/10.24167/tesa.v11i1.223
Wibowo, A. P. (2017). Kriteria Rumah Ramah Lingkungan (Eco-Friendly House). Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, 1(1) 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmstkik.v1i1.386
Yau, Y. (2012). Willingness To Pay and Preferences. Journal of Green Building, 7(2), 137– 152. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.7.2.137
Yeang, K., Yeang, L. D., Energy, S. G., Yeang, K., Dip, A. A., & Lit, D. (2008). Ecoskyscrapers and Ecomimesis : New tall building typologies Architectural/ Design Conference proceeding Unpublished conference paper Magazine article Publication Date : Original Publication : Paper Type : © Council on Tall Bu. https://global.ctbuh.org/resources/papers/download/447-ecoskyscrapers-and-ecomimesis-new-tall-building-typologies.pdf
Zalejska-Jonsson, A. (2014). Stated WTP and rational WTP: Willingness to pay for green apartments in Sweden. Sustainable Cities and Society, 13, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.04.007
Zhang, L., Sun, C., Liu, H., & Zheng, S. (2016). The role of public information in increasing homebuyers’ willingness-to-pay for green housing: Evidence from Beijing. Ecological Economics, 129, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.010
Wahidah, N., Isro’ullaili, I., & Putra, B. K. (2023). The School Literacy Movement (GLS) and Student’s Interest in Reading at SDN 3 Suka Makmur. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(7), 559–564. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7826963
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Energy Justice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
