Analisis metode arkeoastronomi dalam kajian arkeologi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/arc-jcc.v1i1.2024.748Keywords:
archaeoastronomy, astroarchaeology, Panataran candis complex, chronologyAbstract
The abstract for this journal is written in a single paragraph and in a concise manner. References in abstract should be avoided. Also, non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided, but if deemed necessary they must be defined at their first mention within the abstract. The abstract should at least contain these elements. Background: Provide a clear explanation of the context of the study and state the aim of the study in 1–6 sentences. Furthermore, please provide some brief literature review of the relevant studies. Methods: This element should describe the general procedures or technique, data collection technique, and analytical methods. Likewise, if the study is literature review, then author should state the theoretical component. Finding: Summarize the main findings, including specific effect sizes and their statistical significance, if possible. Include (if relevant) the number of participants in each group, the primary outcome for each group, and any significant adverse events or side effects. Also, please explain relation between your theory and your result in your article. Conclusion: In 1–2 sentences, state the principal conclusions, emphasizing new and important aspects of the study or observations in aspect of your research.
References
Aveni, A. F. (1981). Archaeoastronomy. Dalam M. Schiffer, Advance in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press.
Hapsoro, E. L. (1986). Arah-Hadap Candi: Analisis Pendahuluan tentang Kronologi Candi Melalui Pendekatan Astroarkeologi. Fakultas Sastra Universitas Indonesia. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail.jsp?id=20156360
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Archaeology Nexus: Journal of Conservation and Culture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.