State-led funding and support for education innovation programmes: Create a participatory policy to create inclusive and equitable education in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/ajcsee.v2i2.2025.1286Keywords:
education, innovation, participationAbstract
Background: The research focuses on the challenges facing education, particularly the lack of civil society involvement in policy formulation and implementation. Bureaucratic inefficiency, driven by an emphasis on quantity and inertia, hampers educational innovation. The state-funded Education Innovation Programme is designed to address these issues, promoting both educational innovation and the democratisation of education. This programme emphasizes participatory innovation, seeking solutions to the problems within the education system. Methods: This study uses a qualitative approach to analyze the stages of the Education Innovation Programme, including planning, execution, and evaluation. The involvement of innovators, review teams, observers, and government agents is explored in the context of their collaborative, professional, and non-interventionist roles. Findings: The Education Innovation Programme encourages community-driven, innovative ideas with direct state support in terms of funding and mentoring. This collaboration aims to reduce bureaucratic burdens and offer flexible, locally based solutions to education issues. The programme is designed to address the specific problems faced by poor and marginalized groups, enhancing access to education. Conclusion: The Education Innovation Programme has the potential to alleviate access issues in education for marginalized groups, fostering local solutions and empowering civil society. It could provide a more flexible, less rigid approach to solving education problems, particularly in the face of bureaucratic limitations. Novelty/Originality of this Study: This study offers a novel perspective on addressing educational challenges by advocating for a collaborative, bottom-up approach through the Education Innovation Programme. It highlights the potential of state-backed, community-driven innovation to overcome bureaucratic inertia and improve access to education for marginalized communities.
References
Abers, R., I. Brandão, R. King, and D. Votto. (2018). Porto Alegre: Participatory Budgeting and the Challenge of Sustaining Transformative Change. World Resources Report Case Study. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Amruddin, A., Arbainsyah, A., Handayani, S., & Sauri, S. (2022). Patologi Birokrasi Pendidikan. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 16(3), 1036-1048. http://dx.doi.org/10.35931/aq.v16i3.989
Breton, A., & Wintrobe, R. (1979). Bureaucracy and state intervention: Parkinson’s Law? Canadian Public Administration, 22(2), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.1979.tb01813.x
de Ree, Joppe, K. Muralidharan, M. Pradhan, H. Rogers. (2018). Double for Nothing? Experimental Evidence on an Unconditional Teacher Salary Increase in Indonesia. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(2), 993–1039. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx040
Humas. (2021). Menuju Postur Kelembagaan Pemerintah yang Ideal: Pembedaan LPNK Dan LNS. Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. https://setkab.go.id/menuju-postur-kelembagaan-pemerintah-yang-ideal-pembedaan-lpnk-dan-lns/#
Ikramatoun, S., Amin, K., Darwin, D., & Halik, H. (2021). Iron Cage Birokrasi Pendidikan: Suatu Analisis Sosiologis. Jurnal Sosiologi Pendidikan Humanis, 6(1), 18.
Kurba, M. I. H. (2023). Menyoal Anggaran Pendidikan. Kemenkeu.go.id. https://anggaran.kemenkeu.go.id/in/post/menyoal-anggaran-pendidikan
Lewis, Blane. D., & Daan Pattinasarany. (2009). Determining citizen satisfaction with local public education in Indonesia: The significance of actual service quality and governance conditions. Growth Change, 40(1), 85–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2008.00462.x
Male, Cynthia Amanda. (2018). Bagi Butet Manurung, Pendidikan Bukan Sekadar Baca Tulis. Dream.co.id. https://www.dream.co.id/stories/menggagas-konsep-pendidikan-yang-tepat-untuk-anak-pedalaman-180925l.html
Redaksi Koran Banten. (2017, April 20). Pendidikan Indonesia, Antara Infrastruktur dan Suprastruktur. Koran Banten. https://koranbanten.com/pendidikan-indonesia-antara-infrastruktur-dan-suprastruktur/
Rosser, Andrew. (2018). Beyond access: Making Indonesia ’s education system work. Lowy Institute.
Susanto, T. N. V. Y. (2024). Badan Gizi Nasional garap program makan gratis. PT. Kontan Grahanusa Mediatama. https://insight.kontan.co.id/news/badan-gizi-nasional-garap-program-makan-gratis
Usman, Syaikhu. (2018, July 30). Peduli sekolah—tanggung jawab masyarakat dan kewajiban pemerintah. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/peduli-sekolah-tanggung-jawab-masyarakat-dan-kewajiban-pemerintah-100609
Wang, C., Zhang, M., Sesunan, A., & Yolanda, L. (2023). Peran Teknologi dalam Transformasi Pendidikan di Indonesia Tinjauan Dampak Terkini Gerakan Merdeka Belajar.
Wuryanto, H., & Abduh, Moch. (2022, December 5). Mengkaji Kembali Hasil PISA sebagai Pendekatan Inovasi Pembelajaran untuk Peningkatan Kompetensi Literasi dan Numerasi. Gurudikdas.kemdikbud.go.id. https://gurudikdas.kemdikbud.go.id/news/mengkaji-kembali-hasil-pisa-sebagai-pendekatan-inovasi-pembelajaran--untuk-peningkatan-kompetensi-li
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asian Journal Collaboration of Social Environmental and Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.