Fenomena hukuman mati di Indonesia: Tinjauan dari aspek norma, moral, dan legalitas
Keywords:
death penalty, norm, morals, legalityAbstract
Background: This study discusses the phenomenon of the death penalty in Indonesia in cases of premeditated murder from the perspective of H.L.A. Hart. Moral and justice analysis on cases of premeditated murder will have different perspectives and conclusions compared to general discussions on the death penalty. Methods: This research is qualitative, which is a literature study on current issues and is descriptive-analytical. Data analysis in this research uses description, induction and deduction, holistic, internal coherence, and reflection. Finding: The findings of this study indicate that the death penalty in cases of premeditated murder in Indonesia, from a legal standpoint, does not violate or contradict Indonesian positive law. However, from a normative standpoint, the existence of the death penalty itself does not align with the norms observed in Indonesian society that respect human life. Therefore, it is necessary to uphold the judicial process undergone by the convicts so that various cases such as the phenomenon of death row and unfair trials do not occur again. Conclusion: Lastly, regarding the moral aspect, concerning moral views according to Hart, the phenomenon of the death penalty is essentially considered immoral.
References
Arba'i, Y. A. (2012). Aku Menolak Hukuman Mati. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Asmarawati, T. & Myranika, A. (2016). Aspek Disparitas Pemidanaan Dalam Kasus Pembunuhan. Deepublish.
Asmarawati, T. (2013). Hukuman Mati dan Permasalahannya di Indonesia. Deepublish.
Bakker, A. & Zubair, A. C. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Kanisius.
Budiman, A. A., Kamilah, A. G., Maya, G. A. K. S., Iftitahsari, & Rahmawati, M. (2020). Mencabut Nyawa di Masa Pandemi: Laporan Situasi Kebijakan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia 2020: Mencabut Nyawa di Masa Pandemi. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform.
Cane, P. (2012). Morality, Law and Conflicting Reasons for Action. The Cambridge Law Journal, 71(1), 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000207.
DCL, J. K. & George, R. P. (Eds.). (2013). Reason, morality, and law: the philosophy of John Finnis. OUP Oxford.
Hart, H. L. A. (1963). Law, liberty, and morality. Stanford University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (2008). Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (2011). Konsep Hukum. Terjemahan oleh M. Khozim. Nusamedia.
Hutapea, B. (2016). Kontroversi Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Percetakan Pohon Jaya.
Nurshafira, T. (2017). State, Identity, and Discourse: Analysis of Indonesia's Identity on Death Penalty in Jokowi's Era [skripsi, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. Repositori UGM. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/130115.
Setioreni, P. K. (2016). Analisis Eksekusi Hukuman Mati terhadap Seseorang yang Menderita Gangguan Jiwa Menurut Hukum Internasional Studi Kasus Rodrigo Gularte WNA Asal Brasilia. [skripsi, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. Repositori UGM. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/93250.
Soekowathy, R. A. Mth. (2004). Orientasi Filsafat Hukum: Fungsi dan relevansinya bagi rasa keadilan menurut hukum positif [tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. Repositori UGM. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/home/detail_pencarian/23761.
