The politics of law and gender-skewing: The systematic weakening of indigenous women's property rights through legal formalization
Keywords:
customary property rights, gender-skewing, legal formalization, legal pluralism, politics of lawAbstract
Background: This article analyzes the mechanisms and impacts of state legal intervention on the property rights of indigenous women in West Sumatra. Within Indonesia's legal pluralism, state-led legal formalization often collides with customary norms that protect matrilineal communal rights. While prior studies acknowledge this tension, they have not systematically linked the conservative character of macro-level politics of law with its gender-skewing impacts at the micro-level. This study fills that gap by examining how state legal formalization weakens women’s rights previously guaranteed by custom. Methods: This study employs a socio-legal approach grounded in a multi-layered theoretical framework, combining macro-level politics of law and micro-level gender-skewing analysis. Data were examined through an in-depth review of statutes, court decisions, and relevant literature. Findings: The results show that state intervention in land governance imposes a formalistic and bureaucratic validation process for customary rights. This process prioritizes written proof, certification, and individual registration, which are structurally misaligned with communal and matrilineal land tenure systems. As a result, women’s collective authority over pusako land becomes increasingly vulnerable to reinterpretation and reallocation under state law. Court decisions further reinforce individualized ownership models, indirectly legitimizing the transfer or fragmentation of communal assets. These dynamics illustrate how formalization, framed as legal certainty, systematically restructures power relations and diminishes women’s substantive control over property. Conclusion: Legal formalization transforms communal matrilineal rights into individualized property regimes, facilitating gender-skewing and marginalizing customary dispute resolution. Novelty/Originality of this Article: This research demonstrates that conservative politics of law at the macro-level directly contribute to the systematic weakening of indigenous women’s property rights at the micro-level.
References
Aprylasari, D., Azizah, S., Man, N., Siswijono, S. B., Djunaidi, I. H., Mukaromahwati, A., & Rachmawati, A. (2022). Peasant women empowerment as a conflict resolution strategy in Sidomulyo Hamlet, Baluran National Park. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 32(3), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiip.2022.032.03.15
Banakar, R. (2015). Normativity in legal sociology: Methodological reflections on law and regulation in late modernity. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09650-6
Benda-Beckmann, F. von, & Benda-Beckmann, K. von. (2006). Changing one is changing all: Dynamics in the adat–Islam–state triangle. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 38(53–54), 239–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2006.10756604
Benda-Beckmann, F. von, & Benda-Beckmann, K. von. (2007). Ambivalent identities: Decentralization and Minangkabau political communities. In G. Schlee (Ed.), Renegotiating boundaries (pp. 417–442). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004260436_019
Benda-Beckmann, K. von. (1990). Development, law and gender-skewing. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 23(30–31), 87–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1990.10756425
Bhat, P. I. (2020). Idea and methods of legal research (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199493098.001.0001
Blandino, A., Carapezza Figlia, G., Coppo, L., Dabić Nikićević, S., & Dolović Bojić, K. (2023). Gender equality in the different fields of private law. In D. Vujadinović, M. Fröhlich, & T. Giegerich (Eds.), Gender-competent legal education (pp. 505–540). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14360-1_15
Clark, J. (2020). Finding a voice: Silence and its significance for transitional justice. Social & Legal Studies, 29(3), 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663919856685
De Sousa e Brito, J. (2020). Sources, recognition and the unity of the legal system. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 33(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-019-09660-1
Dent, C. M. (2022). Neoliberal environmentalism, climate interventionism and the trade-climate nexus. Sustainability, 14(23), Article 15804. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315804
Dewi, S. F., Yulika, F., Sulaiman, N. L., Salleh, K. M., & Evelynd. (2024). Navigating resistance: The Minangkabau indigenous community’s opposition to the land certification program in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 5764–5774. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.5176
Errico, S. (2021). Women’s right to land between collective and individual dimensions: Some insights from Sub-Saharan Africa. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, Article 690321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.690321
Ganuza, N., Karlander, D., & Salö, L. (2020). A weave of symbolic violence: Dominance and complicity in sociolinguistic research on multilingualism. Multilingua, 39(4), 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2019-0033
Großmann, K. (2022). Human-environment relations and politics in Indonesia. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003176466
Halomoan, M. R., Dharmawan, A. H., & Sunito, S. (2023). Land access, exclusion, and conflict in the dynamics of agrarian changes in forest areas of Napal Putih Village, Tebo District, Sumatra. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 11(3), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.22500/11202349777
Hendra, R., Firmanda, H., Samariadi, S., & Manik, R. G. M. (2025). The importance of tenure and access right for indigenous peoples. Cepalo, 9(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v9no1.3616
Juanda, J., Untari, D. T., & Juanda, O. (2025). Implementation of ESG (environmental, social, and governance) policies in Danantara investments: Social and environmental impacts in Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(2), 152–158. https://theaspd.com/index.php/ijes/article/view/412
Larasatie, P., & Ulifah, C. N. (2023). Mother leads with her heart: A case study of women worker leaders in the men-dominated forestry sector. Merits, 3(3), 432–444. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3030025
Mahfud MD, M. (2017). Politik hukum di Indonesia (Rev. ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2013). Decision No. 35/PUU-X/2012 on the judicial review of Law No. 41 of 1999 on forestry. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. http://www.aman.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/putusan_sidang_35-PUU-2012-Kehutanan-telah-ucap-16-Mei-2013.pdf
Mangkunegara, R. M. A., Alfirdaus, L. K., & Fitriah. (2024). A human rights approach to examine Indonesia’s social forestry policies. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 8(2), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v8i2.52858
Marglin, J., & Letteney, M. (2024). Legal pluralism as a category of analysis. Law and History Review, 42, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0738248023000196
Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency. (2019). Regulation No. 18 of 2019 on the administration of ulayat land of customary law communities. Republic of Indonesia. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/128745/permen-agrariakepala-bpn-no-18-tahun-2019
Ministry of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Regulation No. 7 of 2021 on forestry planning, changes in forest area designation and functions, and the use of forest areas. Republic of Indonesia. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/235244/permen-lhk-no-7-tahun-2021
Province of West Sumatra. (2008). Regional Regulation No. 6 of 2008 on communal land (tanah ulayat) and its utilization. Province of West Sumatra. https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/perda_pempov_sumbar_no._6_tahun_2008.pdf
Republic of Indonesia. (1945). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/infoumum/regulation/pdf/uud45%20eng.pdf
Republic of Indonesia. (1960). Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning basic agrarian principles. https://peraturan.go.id/files2/uu-no-5-tahun-1960_terjemah.pdf
Republic of Indonesia. (1999). Law No. 41 of 1999 on forestry. https://www.flevin.com/id/lgso/translations/Laws/Law%20No.%2041%20of%201999%20on%20Forestry.pdf
Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Law No. 6 of 2014 on villages. https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/ins161827E.pdf
Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021 on the implementation of environmental protection and management. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/161852/pp-no-22-tahun-2021
Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Law No. 6 of 2023 on job creation. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/246523/uu-no-6-tahun-2023
Rudy, R., Yonariza, Y., Yanfika, H., Rahmat, A., Ramadhani, W. S., & Mutolib, A. (2021). Forest cover change and legal pluralism in forest management: A review and evidence from West Sumatra, Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Science & Technology, 6(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v6i2.34190
Rumpia, J. R. (2024). Marginalisation of adat communities: Intersectionality of land grabbing, human rights, climate adaptation, and human mobility in Indonesia. In S. Jolly, N. Ahmad, & M. Scott (Eds.), Climate-related human mobility in Asia and the Pacific: Interdisciplinary rights-based approaches (pp. 221–239). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3234-0_13
Rustiadi, E., & Veriasa, T. O. (2022). Towards inclusive Indonesian forestry: An overview of a spatial planning and agrarian perspective. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 28(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.28.1.60
Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Erbaugh, J. T., Intarini, D., Dharmiasih, W., Makmur, M., Faturachmat, F., Verheijen, B., & Maryudi, A. (2020). The boom of social forestry policy and the bust of social forests in Indonesia: Developing and applying an access–exclusion framework to assess policy outcomes. Forest Policy and Economics, 120, Article 102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102290
Sebastian, A. (2022). Matrilineal practices among Muslims: An ethnographic study of the Minangkabau of West Sumatra. Ethnography, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381221147137
Simarmata, R. (2024). The current updates of the progresses and the challenges of recognition of customary forests in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan, 18(2), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.22146/jik.v18i2.12660
Singirankabo, U. A., & Ertsen, M. W. (2020). Relations between land tenure security and agricultural productivity: Exploring the effect of land registration. Land, 9(5), 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050138
Smessaert, J., Missemer, A., & Levrel, H. (2020). The commodification of nature: A review in social sciences. Ecological Economics, 172, Article 106624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106624
Sufriadi, Y., Ratna, L., & Syarifudin, S. (2024). The violence in conflict of natural resources tenure rights—Companies vs traditional communities in Indonesia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 15(1), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2024.15.1.9
Swardhana, G. M., & Jenvitchuwong, S. (2023). The participation within indigenous land management: Developments and challenges of indigenous communities protection. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 3(2), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v3i1.72
Toumbourou, T. D., Dunphy, M. B., Mulyani, L., Auwalin, I., Rumayya, R., Hartoto, A. S., Aji, G. B., Utomo, M. M. B., Amin, N. A., Yaman, Y., Fakhrani, F. A., Yasmin, P. A., Afriyani, A. A., Masri, M., Arisanti, D., Tjawikrama, D., Friedman, R. S., & Rawluk, A. (2025). Social forestry for a good life? The uneven well-being benefits of Indonesia’s social forestry scheme. People and Nature, 7, 1443–1463. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70042
Wong, G. Y., Moeliono, M., Bong, I. W., Pham, T. T., Sahide, M. A. K., Naito, D., & Brockhaus, M. (2020). Social forestry in Southeast Asia: Evolving interests, discourses and the many notions of equity. Geoforum, 117, 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.10.010
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mhd. Ilham Armi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
