The mechanism for implementing judicial pardon in the criminal justice system in Indonesia: Comparative study with various countries)

Authors

  • Rafa Tabina Bakhiatushsholihat Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 1624, Indonesia

Keywords:

application of law, decision, judicial pardon, legal remedy

Abstract

Background: This study discusses the mechanism of implementing judicial pardon in the criminal justice system in Indonesia with the legal basis of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana/KUHP 2023). Although it has been regulated in the 2023 Criminal Code, this concept is not balanced with formal provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana/KUHAP). Methods: This study is through functional comparative legal with various countries regarding laws and regulations, literature, and other legal materials in analyzing the mechanism of judges in granting judicial pardon, especially regarding the form of decisions and their legal remedies against decisions containing judicial pardons that are in accordance with the regulations and application of judicial pardon in Indonesia. Findings: Although the validity of judicial pardon is only included in the 2023 Criminal Code, the existence of the application of this judicial pardon has existed in criminal justice practices in Indonesia. In addition, there are several countries that have regulated the application of judicial pardon formally in the Criminal Procedure Code, especially the form of the decision and its legal remedies. Conclusion: There is an urgency to regulate the mechanism for imposing judicial pardon in the Criminal Procedure Code which includes the form of the decision on the granting of judicial pardon which is regulated as a special decision and legal remedies against the judicial pardon decision in the form of cassation. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study comprehensively conducts a comparative study with several countries that have regulated the mechanism for applying judicial pardon to find the right formulation for applying judicial pardon to be implemented in Indonesia.

References

Abidin, A. Z., & Hamzah, A. (2010). Pengantar Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Yarsif Watampone.

Arief, B. N. (2017). RUU KUHP Baru sebuah Restrukturisasi/Rekonsentasi Sistem Hukum Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip.

Gruel, D. L. (1991). Pardons et Châtiments: Les Jurés Français Face aux Violences Criminelles. Paris: Nathan Publishing.

Hamzah, A. (2019). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Harahap, Y. M. (2010). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hartono, 20/PUU-XXI/2023 (Mahkamah Konstitusi 2023).

Hasibuan, S. M. (2021). Kebijakan Formulasi Rechterlijke Pardon Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 111-115.

Hidayat, R. (2023, September 28). Ini Daftar RUU Prolegnas Prioritas 2024. Retrieved from Hukum Online: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ini-daftar-ruu-prolegnas-prioritas-2024-lt650bd7d9ae4e2/

History. (2023, April 24). Code of Hammurabi. Retrieved from History: https://www.history.com/topics/ancient-middle-east/hammurabi

Hoecke, M. V. (2015). Methodology of Comparative Legal Research. Law and Method, 6-7.

Iramaya, L. M. (2024, Desember 18). Hasil Wawancara dengan Lalu Moh. Sandi Iramaya, S.H., M.H. (R. Tabina, Interviewer)

Keizer, N., & Schaffmeister, D. (1990). Beberapa Catatan Tentang Rancangan Permulaan 1998 Buku I KUHP Baru Indonesia. Belanda: Driebergen/Valkenburg.

King, L. W. (n.d.). The Code of Hammurabi. Retrieved from Avalon Law Yale: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/ancient/hamframe.asp

Malasai, L. (2019). Asas Culpa In Causa (Penyebab Kesalahan) Sebagai Pengecualian Terhadap Pembelaan Terpaksa Menurut Pasal 49 ayat (1) KUHP. Lex Crimen, 79.

Reform, T. P. (2022). Peluang dan Tantangan Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform.

Rolph, C. H. (1978). The Queen’s Pardon. Michigan: Cassell.

Saputro, A. A. (2016). Konsepsi Rechterlijk Pardon atau Pemaafan Hakim Dalam Rancangan KUHP. Mimbar Hukum, 67-79.

Soekanto, S. (2007). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Tait, D. (2001). Pardons in Perspective: The Role of Forgiveness in Criminal Justice. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 134.

Wahyudi, R., & Bunda, N. F. (2024, Desember 17). Hasil Wawancara dengan Ramon Wahyudi, S.H., M.H. dan Nova Flory Bunda, S.H., M.Hum. (R. Tabina, Interviewer)

Published

2025-02-28

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check