The urgency of establishing a legal basis for amicus curiae in the administrative court system

Authors

  • Cindy Chairunisa Faculty of Law, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155, Indonesia
  • Adelina Mariani Sihombing Faculty of Law, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155, Indonesia
  • Herdy Ansyari Harahap Faculty of Law, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155, Indonesia

Keywords:

amicus curiae, administrative court, administrative law

Abstract

Background: In the current developments and evidentiary mechanisms, one of the interesting things is the application of amicus curiae (friend of the judiciary). The application of amicus curiae has actually been widely used in Indonesia, especially in cases of administrative disputes. Even though it is widely used, there are no regulations regarding amicus curiae that specifically regulate its use, such as the time period for filing it or who can submit an amicus curiae. This article aims to explain the urgency of establishing a legal basis related to the application of amicus curiae in the State Administrative Court system. Methods: Writing this article uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach and a comparative approach. The target comparison countries are America and France. Findings: From the research results, it was found that the application of amicus curiae has been widely used by judges in deciding disputes in the field of state administration, but to date there is no legal basis that specifically regulates amicus curiae, thus creating a legal vacuum in terms of the criteria for people who can file amicus curiae. , the standard format or form of amicus curiae, as well as the time period for submitting amicus curiae. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the necessity of establishing a legal framework to govern the use of amicus curiae in the State Administrative Court system. Clear regulations outlining eligibility, submission timelines, and formats are crucial to ensuring transparency and enhancing the judicial process in administrative disputes. It is recommended that the government draw upon the practices of other nations, such as the United States and France, to develop a comprehensive legal framework for amicus curiae in Indonesia. Novelty/Originality: By comparing the practices in the United States and France, this article offers practical insights and recommendations for enhancing the role of amicus curiae in enriching judicial decisions, a topic that has not been thoroughly addressed in the Indonesian legal context.

References

Agustinus, P., et. al. 2023. Pengaruh Peran Amicus Curiae Terhadap Proses Peradilan Dan Kepastian Hukum. UNES Law Review 6(2): 4463-68. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1283

Analisa. 2024. Sengketa Guru Honorer Langkat, Guru besar dan Akademisi Ajukan Amicus Curiae. Dapat diakses pada laman https://analisadaily.com/berita/baca/2024/09/12/1055510/sengketa-guru-honorer-langkat-guru-besar-dan-akademisi-ajukan-amicus-curiae/

Dennis Yeremia dan Arief Rachman Hakim, Urgensi Pengaturan Amicus Curiae dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Dengan Amerika Serikat), Jurnal Darma Agung, 32(4): 119–28, https://doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v32i4.4441

Edison, Johanes. 2024. The Introduction of Amicus Curiae as Formal Legal Instrument to Enhance Judicial Integrity. Judex Laguens 2(2): 237-264. https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.2.2.8.2024.237-264

Greenpeace. 2023. Krisis Iklim Telah Membuka Pintu Neraka, Mempertahankan Hutan adalah Upaya Terbaik Menahannya. Jayapura. https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-indonesia-stateless/2023/10/ab806b72-amicus-curiae-for-awyu-greenpeace.pdf

Hasanuddin, M. I., et. al. 2022. Peran Amicus Curiae Pada Putusan Gugatan Terhadap Proses Seleksi Calon Hakim Agung (Studi Putusan No. 270/G/2018/PTUN-JKT). Jurnal Yudisial 15(1): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i1.533

Hiarej, Edy OS. 2012. Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga. https://inlislite.ipdn.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=8689

HuMa Indonesia. 2019. Peninjauan Kembali Putusan No. 064/G/2015/PTUN-SMG dan Putusan No. 135/B/2015/PT.TUN-SBY. Dapat diakses pada laman https://herlambangperdana.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/amicuscuriaerembang-final.pdf

Ibad, Syahrul. 2021. Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Upaya Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Yang Baik. Jurnal Hukum Hukmy 1(1): 55-72. https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2021.v1i1.55-72

Iryna Izarova, et. al. 2019. Amicus Curiae: Origin, Worldwide Experience and Suggestions for East European Countries. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 60(1): 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2019.60103

Komang, Ni, et al. 2021. Penerapan Asas Hakim Aktif (Dominus Litis) dalam Persidangan Pegadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Studi Kasus Putusan No 1/G/2017/PTUN.DPS.). Jurnal Prefensi Hukum 2(1): 27-32. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.1.3048.27-32

Legal Information Institute. Amicus Curiae. dapat diakses pada laman https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/amicus_curiae

Lubis, Muhammad Syafari. 2021. Analisis Yuridis Peran Amicus Curiae (Sahabat Pengadilan) Dalam Sistem Pengadilan Pidana Di Indonesia Pada Pengadilan Negeri Medan (studi putusan No 1612/Pid.B/2018/PN.Mdn Jo Putusan No.784/Pid/2018/PT.Mdn). (Skripsi). Universitas Medan Area. https://repositori.uma.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/15946/1/168400113%20-%20Muhammad%20Syafari%20Lubis%20-%20Fulltext.pdf

Perkumpulan HuMa Indonesia. 2020. Amicus Brief. Jakarta. https://www.huma.or.id/isu-strategis/amicus-brief-omnibus-huma

Pralampita, Linda Ayu. 2020. Kedudukan Amicus Curiae dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. Lex Renaissance 3 (5): 558-572. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss3.art4

Pusaka Bentala Rakyat. 2022. Papua Bukan Tanah Kosong. Dapat diakses pada laman https://pusaka.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Amicus-Curiae-Perkara-577-terhadap-Putusan-Gugatan-PT-PUA-Melawan-Bupati-Sorsel-update-17112022.pdf

Puskaha Djojodigoeno. 2023. Pertimbangan Izin Sosial dan Penilaian Dampak Perubahan Iklim Suatu Keharusan. Dapat diakses pada laman https://pusaka.or.id/pertimbangan-izin-sosial-dan-penilaian-dampak-perubahan-iklim-suatu-keharusan/

Rembeth, Irene Amadhea dan Mirza Marali. 2023 Meninjau Ulang Peran Amicus Curiae dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Dapat diakses pada laman https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/meninjau-ulang-peran-amicus-curiae-dalam-sistem-peradilan-pidana-di-indonesia-lt64e34a5d244d2?page=2#

Saputra, Andi. 2019. Gagal Jadi Hakim Agung, Gugatan Hakim Pengadil Kopi Sianida Ditolak. Dapat diakses pada laman https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4506400/gagal-jadi-hakim-agung-gugatan-hakim-pengadil-kopi-sianida-ditolak

Sudarsono, et al. 2021. Kajian Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Mahkamah Agung. https://ebook.bldk.mahkamahagung.go.id/index.php/product/121-kajian-pembaruan-hukum-acara-di-peradilan-tata-usaha-negara/

Sukinta. 2021. Konsep dan Praktik Pelaksanaan Amicus Curiae Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Administrative Law & Goverment Journal 4 (2): 89-98. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v4i1.89%20-%2098

Yewen, Roberthus dan Priska Sari Pertiwi. 2022. Menang di PTUN, Bupati Sorong Selatan Cabut Izin Perkebunan 2 Perusahaan Sawit. Dapat diakses pada laman https://regional.kompas.com/read/2022/05/24/074920078/menang-di-ptun-bupati-sorong-selatan-cabut-izin-perkebunan-2-perusahaan.

Yustiana, Dewi. 2019. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Surabaya: Mitra Sumber Rejeki. https://sasanti.or.id/ojs/index.php/pm/article/view/59

Wahid, Ahmad Bil. 2019. PTUN Diminta Tolak Gugatan Hakim Binsar Si Pengadil Kopi Sianida. Dapat diakses pada laman https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4462122/ptun-diminta-tolak-gugatan-hakim-binsar-si-pengadil-kopi-sianida.

Published

2025-02-28

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check