Effectiveness of rehabilitation type adjustment based on CMP analysis in improving cost efficiency and success of rehabilitation program for drug abusers

Habbibul Haris; Ni Made Martini Puteri

Authors

Habbibul Haris Criminology Program, Faculty of Social Science and Political Science, University of Indonesia, Indonesia
Ni Made Martini Puteri Criminology, Faculty of Social Science and Political Science, University of Indonesia, Indonesia

Keywords:

CMP analysis, cost-efficiency of rehabilitation, outpatient rehabilitation, integrated assessment, risk level

Abstract

Background: Outpatient rehabilitation for drug abusers is often inappropriate for individual conditions, which may affect the effectiveness of rehabilitation. This study aims to evaluate the difference between the results of integrated assessment recommendations and CMP analysis in determining the type of rehabilitation appropriate to the suspect's risk level. Methods: This study used a comparative analysis approach between the results of the integrated assessment recommendations and the CMP analysis, which integrates social and economic dimensions to assess the suitability of the type of rehabilitation based on the individual's risk level. Findings: The results of the analysis showed a discrepancy between the integrated assessment recommendations and the CMP analysis, where only a small proportion of suspects were recommended for outpatient rehabilitation despite having favorable social conditions. In addition, the CMP analysis showed that adjusting the type of rehabilitation to the level of risk can reduce the rehabilitation costs borne by the state. Conclusion: Adjusting the type of rehabilitation according to the level of risk and socio-economic condition of the individual can increase the effectiveness of rehabilitation and reduce the cost burden on the state. The integrated assessment team is advised to further consider these factors in providing matched rehabilitation recommendations. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study introduces the use of CMP analysis as a tool to optimize the determination of rehabilitation type, which integrates economic dimensions in designing rehabilitation financing, and makes an important contribution to improving the efficiency of drug rehabilitation programs.

References

Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge.

Atadokht, A., Hajloo, N., Karimi, M., & Narimani, M. (2015). The role of family expressed emotion and perceived social support in predicting addiction relapse. International journal of high risk behaviors & addiction, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijhrba.21250

Badan Narkotika Nasional. (2017). Standar pelayanan rehabilitasi BNN. Jakarta: Badan Narkotika Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Badan Narkotika Nasional. (2018). Jurnal data puslitdatin tahun 2018 Indonesia: Narkoba dalam angka tahun 2017. Jakarta: Badan Narkotika Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Best, D. (2019). Pathways to recovery and desistance: The role of the social contagion of hope. Policy Press.

Carrabine, E., et al. (2009). Criminology: A sociological introduction (Second edition). Routledge.

Cartwright, W. S., & Solano, P. L. (2003). The economics of public health: financing drug abuse treatment services. Health policy, Vol. 66(3), 247-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(03)00066-6

Daley, D. C., & Marlatt, G. A. (2006). Overcoming your alcohol or drug problem: Effective recovery strategies. 2nd edition. Oxford University Press.

Darmawan, M. K. (2007). Teori kriminologi. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

De Leon, G., Melnick, G., & Cleland, C. M. (2008). Client matching: A severity-treatment intensity paradigm. Journal of addictive diseases, Vol.27(3), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10550880802122703

De Leon, G., Melnick, G., & Cleland, C. M. (2010). Matching to sufficient treatment: Some characteristics of undertreated (mismatched) clients. Journal of addictive diseases, Vol.29(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10550880903436051

Durrant, R., Fisher, S., & Thun, M. (2011). Understanding punishment responses to drug offenders: The role of social threat, individual harm, moral wrongfulness, and emotional warmth. Contemporary Drug Problems, 38(1), 147-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/009145091103800107

Fuller, J. R. (2012). Think criminology. McGraw Hill Education.

Hagan, F. E. (2013). Pengantar kriminologi: teori, metode, dan perilaku kriminal. Edisi ketujuh. Jakarta: Kencana Prenamedia Group.

Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., & Simpson, D. D. (1999). Risk factors that predict dropout from corrections-based treatment for drug abuse. The prison journal, Vol. 79(4), 411-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885599079004004

Lowenkamp, C.T., & Latessa, E.J. (2005). Increasing effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying Offenders for residential placement. Criminology & Public Policy, Vol 4 (2), 263-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00021.x

Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs?. Crime & delinquency, Vol. 52(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281747

McCarty, et. al. (2014). Substance abuse intensive outpatient programs: assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services, Vol. 65(6), 718-726. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300249

McLellan, A. T., Woody, G. E., Luborsky, L., Oʼbrien, C. P., & Druley, K. A. (1983). Increased effectiveness of substance abuse treatment: A prospective study of patient–treatment "matching." Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 171(10), 597–605. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1097/00005053-198310000-00002

Melnick, G., et. al. (2001). A client-treatment matching protocol for therapeutic communities: first report. Journal of substance abuse treatment, Vol. 21(3), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(01)00191-X

Mocan, H. N., & Tekin, E. (2003). Guns, drugs and juvenile crime: Evidence from a panel of siblings and twins (No. w9824). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w9824

Pettinati, H. M., et. al. (1993). Inpatient vs outpatient treatment for substance dependence revisited. Psychiatric quarterly, Vol. 64(2), 173-182. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/BF01065868

Reif, S., et. al. (2014). Residential treatment for individuals with substance use disorders: assessing the evidence. Psychiatric services, Vol. 65(3), 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300242

Ronel, N., & Elisha, E. (2011). A different perspective: Introducing positive criminology. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, Vol. 55 (2), 305-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X09357772

Sarker, S. K., & Faller, E. M. (2016). An exploratory framework of drug related crime in forensic sciences and criminology. Malaysian applications Biology, Vol. 45(2), 93-97.

Stahler, G. J., Mennis, J., & DuCette, J. P. (2016). Residential and outpatient treatment completion for substance use disorders in the US: Moderation analysis by demographics and drug of choice. Addictive behaviors, Vol.58, 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030

Schulte, M. T., & Hser, Y. I. (2013). Substance use and associated health conditions throughout the lifespan. Public health reviews, Vol. 35(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391702

Tanner-Smith, E. E., Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2013). The comparative effectiveness of outpatient treatment for adolescent substance abuse: a meta-analysis. Journal of substance abuse treatment, Vol. 44(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2012.05.006

Wormith, J. S., et. al. (2007). The Rehabilitation and Reintegration of Offenders: The Current Landscape and Some Future Directions for Correctional Psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol 34(7), 879-892. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0093854807301552

Yesberg, J. A., & Polaschek, D. L. L. (2019). How does offender rehabilitation actually work? exploring mechanisms of change in high-risk treated parolees. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, Vol. 63 (15-16), 2672-2692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19856221