Bibliometric analysis of ecocentrism: Perspective on sustainable development and addressing environmental issues
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jocae.v2i2.2025.1483Keywords:
ecocentrism, bibliometric analysis, sustainable development, VOSviewer, environmental studiesAbstract
Background: Ecocentrism, emphasizing the intrinsic value and interconnectedness of nature, has become a significant perspective in environmental and development fields. This article aims to explore research trends on ecocentrism using a science-mapping approach. Methods: A bibliometric analysis of 1,317 documents from Scopus (1982–2024) was conducted using VOSviewer and Biblioshiny to visualize research linkages. Findings: Research on ecocentrism has grown exponentially since 2010, with a peak in 2022. Key topics in this field include ecocide, ecocriticism, rights of nature, future generations, indigenous peoples, and posthumanism, providing a foundation for future studies. Conclusion: Ecocentrism plays a pivotal role in sustainable development, focusing on ecosystem restoration, responsible management, and ecological sustainability while promoting the rights of future generations and strengthening indigenous conservation efforts. Novelty/Originality of the Study: This study provides a comprehensive mapping of research on ecocentrism, revealing its growing significance and key topics that are central to advancing future ecological research and sustainable development.
References
Altun, D. (2020). Preschoolers’ pro-environmental orientations and theory of mind: ecocentrism and anthropocentrism in ecological dilemmas. Early Child Development and Care, 190(11), 1820–1832. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1542385
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Berry, T. (1999). The Great Work: Our Way into the Future. Bell Tower.
Binder, C. R., Hinkel, J., Bots, P. W. G., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05551-180426
Căpușneanu, S., Stolojescu, B. I. N., & Rakoș, I. S. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis on the Environmental Ethics Performance. Future Trends. Ovidius University Annals, Series Economic Sciences, 24(1). https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxxivy2024i1p164-174.html
Carson, R. (2017). Silent Spring (1962). The Future of Nature.
Carter, A. (2011). Towards a multidimensional, environmentalist ethic. Environmental Values, 20(3), 347–374. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327111X13077055166027
Çelik, A. A. (2023). Paradigm Shift for the Consumers on the Edge of the Environmental Crisis: Bibliometric Analysis of New Environmental Paradigm. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 21(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1101612
Coursey, D. G. (1982). Traditional Tropical Root Crop Technology: Some Interactions with Modern Science. The IDS Bulletin, 13(3), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.1982.mp13003003.x
Curry, P. (2012). Ecological Ethics: An introduction. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/meq.2012.08323caa.008
da Silva, S. S., Reis, R. P., & Amâncio, R. (2011). Environmental paradigms in sustainability reports of energy sector organizations. Revista de Administracao Mackenzie, 12(3), 146–176. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-69712011000300007
De Santis, E., Martino, A., & Rizzi, A. (2020). An Infoveillance System for Detecting and Tracking Relevant Topics From Italian Tweets During the COVID-19 Event. IEEE Access, 8, 132527–132538. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010033
Devall, B., & Sessions, G. (1985). Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered. Sage Journals.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory Toward an ecocentric approach. Taylor & Francis Group.
Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
Egri, C. P., & Herman, S. (2000). Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 571–604. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556356
Ence, A. K., Cope, S. R., Holliday, E. B., & Somerson, J. S. (2016). Publication productivity and experience: factors associated with academic rank among orthopaedic surgery faculty in the United States. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 98(10), e41. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.00757
Gursoy, D., Chi, C. G., & Dyer, P. (2010). Locals’ attitudes toward mass and alternative tourism: The case of Sunshine Coast, Australia. Journal of Travel Research, 49(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287509346853
Gursoy, D., Jurowski, C., & Uysal, M. (2002). Resident attitudes: A structural modeling approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00028-7
Gursoy, D., & Kendall, K. W. (2006). Hosting mega events. Modeling Locals’ Support. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(3), 603–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2006.01.005
Gursoy, D., & Rutherford, D. G. (2004). Host attitudes toward tourism: An improved structural model. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(3), 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2003.08.008
Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
Jurowski, C., Uysal, M., & Williams, D. R. (1997). A theoretical analysis of host community resident reactions to tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 36(2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759703600202
King, R. J. H. (2006). Playing with boundaries: Critical reflections on strategies for an environmental culture and the promise of civic environmentalism. Ethics, Place and Environment, 9(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668790600694576
Kortenkamp, K. V, & Moore, C. F. (2001). Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0205
Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press.
Lis, A., Sudolska, A., & Tomanek, M. (2020). Mapping Research on Sustainable Supply-Chain Management. Sustainability, 12(10), 3987. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12103987
Lu, H., Zhang, W., Diao, B., Liu, Y., Chen, H., Long, R., & Cai, S. (2023). The progress and trend of pro-environmental behavior research: a bibliometrics-based visualization analysis. Current Psychology, 42(8), 6912–6932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01809-1
Luke, T. W. (2002). Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered. Organization & Environment, 15(2), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/10826602015002005
Medlock, F., & White, R. (2022). Ecocide, Ecocentrism and Social Obligation. Erasmus Law Review, 15(3), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000220
Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391602237244
O’Hara, D. (2005). The Great Work: Our Way into the Future By Thomas Berry New. Spirituality and Health International, 6(4), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/shi.35
Piccolo, J. J., Taylor, B., Washington, H., Kopnina, H., Gray, J., Alberro, H., & Orlikowska, E. (2022). “Nature’s contributions to people” and peoples’ moral obligations to nature. Biological Conservation, 270, 109572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109572
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. Routledge.
Regan, T. (2023). The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press.
Sarie, F., Murthada, M., & Jusatria, J. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Eco-Friendly Practices in Contemporary Popular Culture. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 1(04), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v1i04.273
Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of environmental psychology, 19(3), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0129
Singer, P. (1977). Animal Liberation. The Philosophical Review, 86(4), 557. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184568
Taylor, P. W. (1986). Respect for Nature. Princeton University Press.
Thompson, S. C. G., & Barton, M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of environmental Psychology, 14(2), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80168-9
United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Macat Library.
Washington, H. (2021). Questioning the Assumptions, Sustainability and Ethics of Endless Economic Growth. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(10), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14100497
Washington, H., Piccolo, J. J., Kopnina, H., & O’Leary Simpson, F. (2024). Ecological and social justice should proceed hand-in-hand in conservation. Biological Conservation, 290, 110456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110456
Washington, H., Taylor, B., Kopnina, H., Cryer, P., & Piccolo, J. J. (2017). Why ecocentrism is the key pathway to sustainability. The Ecological Citizen, 1(1), 35-41. http://www.ecologicalcitizen.net/
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.
Xie, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z., & Lv, T. (2020a). A bibliometric analysis on land degradation: Current status, development, and future directions. Land, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND9010028
Xie, H., Zhang, Y., Zeng, X., & He, Y. (2020b). Sustainable land use and management research: A scientometric review. Landscape Ecology, 35, 2381-2411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01002-y
Yadav, C., & Sinha, J. (2024). Exploring the evolution of ecocriticism: A bibliometric study and literature review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(12), 10–11. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024304
Yoshida, Y., Matsuda, H., Fukushi, K., Takeuchi, K., & Watanabe, R. (2022). The missing intangibles: nature’s contributions to human wellbeing through place attachment and social capital. Sustainability Science, 17(3), 809–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01067-x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chandra Egy Setiawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
