Driving factors of innovation: Dimensions of open culture and conscious innovation management in the environmental context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jocae.v2i2.2025.1215Keywords:
innovation management, cultural openness, sustainable developmentAbstract
Background: Innovation is crucial for advancing businesses, organizations, and countries, especially amid rapid environmental changes and technological advancements. Universities, as key sources of innovation, must shift to include societal contributions. Despite progress, challenges in commercialization hinder the effective translation of research into marketable products. This study explores the driving factors of innovation at Universitas Indonesia, focusing on open culture and conscious innovation management in an environmental context. Methods: This study utilizes an embedded mixed-methods design, primarily focusing on quantitative research to analyze driving factors of innovation at Universitas Indonesia, employing descriptive analysis through SPSS software for data interpretation. Findings: This section analyzes the driving factors of the innovation process at the University of Indonesia, focusing on respondents' perceptions of collaboration, governance, communication, and financial motivation, highlighting areas for improvement. UI demonstrates high cooperation with the business sector but requires more dynamic regulations for effective collaboration. The Dimension of Conscious Innovation Management at UI demonstrates professionalism in innovation management; however, there are still challenges related to program regulations. Conclusion: Universitas Indonesia should enhance collaboration, establish structured remuneration, and allow flexible SOPs to foster sustainable innovation. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study uniquely investigates the interplay of cultural openness and conscious innovation management at Universitas Indonesia, offering practical recommendations to enhance commercialization and sustainability in the university's innovation processes
References
Betaraya, D. M., Nasim, S., & Mukhopadhyay, J. (2018). Subsidiary innovation in a developing economy: Towards a comprehensive model and directions for future research. FIIB Business Review, 7(2), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714518788387
Bidang Riset dan Inovasi Universitas Indonesia. (2020). Roadmap Riset dan Inovasi Universitas Indonesia tahun 2020-2024.
Cai, Y., Ma, J., & Chen, Q. (2020). Higher education in innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(11), 4376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114376
Compagnucci, L., & Spigarelli, F. (2020). The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Reseach Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. SAGE Publications.
Desai, A. (2016, April 20). Innovation and the World Bank. World Bank. https://blogs.worldbank.org/voices/innovation-and-world-bank
Ernis, D. (2023, November 13). UI Ungkap 3 Strategi untuk Pacu Lahirkan Banyak Inovasi. Tempo.co. https://tekno.tempo.co/read/1796249/ui-ungkap-3- strategi-untuk-pacu-lahirkan-banyak-inovasi
Exposito, A., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2018). Innovation and business performance for Spanish SMEs: New evidence from a multi-dimensional approach. International Small Business Journal, 36(8), 911-931. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242618782596
Farisi, M. I. (2023, April 29). Minimnya Hilirisasi Hasil Riset dan Inovasi Perguruan Tinggi. https://www.kompas.com/edu/read/2023/04/29/112534671/minimnya-hilirisasi-hasil-riset-dan-inovasi-perguruan-tinggi?page=2FEB%20UI.
FEB UI. (2020, Oktober 31). Tantangan Perguruan Tinggi di 2021 yang Penuh dengan Ketidakpastian. https://feb.ui.ac.id/2020/10/31/tantangan-perguruan-tinggi-di-2021-yang-penuh-dengan-ketidakpastian/
Hanaysha, J. R., Al-Shaikh, M. E., Joghee, S., & Alzoubi, H. M. (2022). Impact of innovation capabilities on business sustainability in small and medium enterprises. FIIB Business Review, 11(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211042232
Herlina, N. (2021, Maret 10). Inovasi Perguruan Tinggi Kunci Kemajuan Bangsa. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi. http://www.dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/kabar-dikti/kabar/inovasi-perguruan-tinggi-kunci-kemajuan-bangsa/
Lantara, F. (2023, Februari 12). Antara News. Diambil kembali dari Inovasi UI yang Terbukti Memberi Solusi Bagi Negeri. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3392457/inovasi-ui-
Lichtenthaler, U. (2016). Toward an innovation-based perspective on company performance. Management Decision, 54(1), 66-87. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2015-0161
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson.
Neuman, W. L. (2019). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson Education.
Scimago Institutions Rangkings. (2023). Scimago Institutions Rangkings. SCImago Lab.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Character and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.