Driving factors of innovation: Dimensions of open culture and conscious innovation management in the environmental context

Authors

  • Verens Elvira Business Administration Study Program, Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java 16424, Indonesia
  • Retno Kusumastuti Business Administration Study Program, Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java 16424, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/jocae.v2i2.2025.1215

Keywords:

innovation management, cultural openness, sustainable development

Abstract

Background: Innovation is crucial for advancing businesses, organizations, and countries, especially amid rapid environmental changes and technological advancements. Universities, as key sources of innovation, must shift to include societal contributions. Despite progress, challenges in commercialization hinder the effective translation of research into marketable products. This study explores the driving factors of innovation at Universitas Indonesia, focusing on open culture and conscious innovation management in an environmental context. Methods: This study utilizes an embedded mixed-methods design, primarily focusing on quantitative research to analyze driving factors of innovation at Universitas Indonesia, employing descriptive analysis through SPSS software for data interpretation. Findings: This section analyzes the driving factors of the innovation process at the University of Indonesia, focusing on respondents' perceptions of collaboration, governance, communication, and financial motivation, highlighting areas for improvement. UI demonstrates high cooperation with the business sector but requires more dynamic regulations for effective collaboration. The Dimension of Conscious Innovation Management at UI demonstrates professionalism in innovation management; however, there are still challenges related to program regulations. Conclusion: Universitas Indonesia should enhance collaboration, establish structured remuneration, and allow flexible SOPs to foster sustainable innovation. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study uniquely investigates the interplay of cultural openness and conscious innovation management at Universitas Indonesia, offering practical recommendations to enhance commercialization and sustainability in the university's innovation processes

References

Betaraya, D. M., Nasim, S., & Mukhopadhyay, J. (2018). Subsidiary innovation in a developing economy: Towards a comprehensive model and directions for future research. FIIB Business Review, 7(2), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714518788387

Bidang Riset dan Inovasi Universitas Indonesia. (2020). Roadmap Riset dan Inovasi Universitas Indonesia tahun 2020-2024.

Cai, Y., Ma, J., & Chen, Q. (2020). Higher education in innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(11), 4376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114376

Compagnucci, L., & Spigarelli, F. (2020). The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Reseach Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. SAGE Publications.

Desai, A. (2016, April 20). Innovation and the World Bank. World Bank. https://blogs.worldbank.org/voices/innovation-and-world-bank

Ernis, D. (2023, November 13). UI Ungkap 3 Strategi untuk Pacu Lahirkan Banyak Inovasi. Tempo.co. https://tekno.tempo.co/read/1796249/ui-ungkap-3- strategi-untuk-pacu-lahirkan-banyak-inovasi

Exposito, A., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2018). Innovation and business performance for Spanish SMEs: New evidence from a multi-dimensional approach. International Small Business Journal, 36(8), 911-931. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242618782596

Farisi, M. I. (2023, April 29). Minimnya Hilirisasi Hasil Riset dan Inovasi Perguruan Tinggi. https://www.kompas.com/edu/read/2023/04/29/112534671/minimnya-hilirisasi-hasil-riset-dan-inovasi-perguruan-tinggi?page=2FEB%20UI.

FEB UI. (2020, Oktober 31). Tantangan Perguruan Tinggi di 2021 yang Penuh dengan Ketidakpastian. https://feb.ui.ac.id/2020/10/31/tantangan-perguruan-tinggi-di-2021-yang-penuh-dengan-ketidakpastian/

Hanaysha, J. R., Al-Shaikh, M. E., Joghee, S., & Alzoubi, H. M. (2022). Impact of innovation capabilities on business sustainability in small and medium enterprises. FIIB Business Review, 11(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211042232

Herlina, N. (2021, Maret 10). Inovasi Perguruan Tinggi Kunci Kemajuan Bangsa. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi. http://www.dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/kabar-dikti/kabar/inovasi-perguruan-tinggi-kunci-kemajuan-bangsa/

Lantara, F. (2023, Februari 12). Antara News. Diambil kembali dari Inovasi UI yang Terbukti Memberi Solusi Bagi Negeri. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3392457/inovasi-ui-

Lichtenthaler, U. (2016). Toward an innovation-based perspective on company performance. Management Decision, 54(1), 66-87. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2015-0161

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson.

Neuman, W. L. (2019). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson Education.

Scimago Institutions Rangkings. (2023). Scimago Institutions Rangkings. SCImago Lab.

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Elvira, V., & Kusumastuti, R. (2025). Driving factors of innovation: Dimensions of open culture and conscious innovation management in the environmental context. Journal of Character and Environment, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.61511/jocae.v2i2.2025.1215

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check