Evaluation of child protection case in Indonesia: Exploring barriers and policy directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jgedsic.v3i2.2026.2191Keywords:
child protection, institutional fragmentation, policy designAbstract
Background: Indonesia has built a strong legal foundation for child protection, including Law No. 35 of 2014 and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which comprehensively regulates child protection. On the other hand, there is a significant gap between legal recognition and practical concretization, which the government actualizes through the Indonesian Child Protection Commission. Methods: This study employed a descriptive qualitative method with content analysis, collecting secondary data from 2016–2024. Data were organized, analyzed, and triangulated to examine child protection cases in Indonesia, providing insights to guide policy recommendations and address structural and coordination challenges. Findings: The findings reveal institutional crumble, limited coordination between central and regional governments, a lack of trained personnel, and weak data systems as the main issues in child protection cases in Indonesia. Despite policy and budgetary interventions, legal gaps, fragmented monitoring, and cultural barriers persist, highlighting the need for harmonized regulations, capacity building, integrated data, and community engagement to strengthen child protection. Conclusion: The study concludes that legal frameworks alone are insufficient; effective child protection requires coordinated institutions, stronger local capacity, cultural transformation, and a community-based approach to ensure children’s rights are fulfilled, upholding commitments and safeguarding every child consistently. Novelty/Originality of this article: The novelty of this study highlights the scientific implications of child protection cases in Indonesia by evaluating the period from 2016 to 2024 as a reflection to protect children’s rights, providing new insights to overcome barriers, and offering policy recommendations to adequately address these issues.
References
Alfandari, R., & Taylor, B. J. (2022). Community-based multi-professional child protection decision making: Systematic narrative review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 123, 105432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105432
Andow, C., Kleipoedszus, S., Dunn, R., Wake, N., Arthur, R., Shafi, A., & Gibson, D. (2024). Re- designing secure children’s homes through a child-first lens. Societies, 14(11), 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14110217
Androniceanu, A. (2021). Transparency in public administration as a challenge for a good democratic governance. Revista» Administratie si Management Public «(RAMP), (36), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2021.36-09
Angelöw, A., & Psouni, E. (2025). Participatory research with children: From child-rights based principles to practical guidelines for meaningful and ethical participation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251315391
Artisna, P., Naswa, F., & Rohmah, M. (2022). Respon generasi milenial Indonesia di tengah masuknya budaya asing. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Ilmu Sosial (SNIIS), 1, 695-705). https://proceeding.unesa.ac.id/index.php/sniis
Boatswain-Kyte, A., Trocmé, N., Esposito, T., & Fast, E. (2022). Child protection agencies collaborating with grass-root community organizations: partnership or tokenism? Journal of Public Child Welfare, 16(3), 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2021.1891184
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Ecological systems theory. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Burman, E. (2023). Child as method as an intersectional frame for conceptualising the geopolitics of child rights. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 31(3), 568–597. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-31030002
Creswell, J. W., & Báez, J. C. (2020). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Dodgson, J. E. (2017). About research: Qualitative methodologies. Journal of Human Lactation, 33(2), 355–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334417698693
Hampson, M., Goldsmith, C., & Lefevre, M. (2021). Towards a framework for ethical innovation in children’s social care. Journal of Children’s Services, 16(3), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-12-2020-0080
Han, L. (2024). Addressing Child Trafficking Adopting a Human Rights-Based Approach. In Child Trafficking in China: A Human Rights Based Perspective (pp. 25-61). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3717-8_2
Hardiyanti, K., & Indawati, Y. (2023). Perlindungan Bagi Anak Korban Cyberbullying: Studi Di Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia Daerah (KPAID) Jawa Timur. SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan, 2(4), 1179–1198. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v2i4.763
Indonesian Child Protection Commission. (2015). Renstra-Sekretariat-KPAI-2015-2019. https://www.kpai.go.id/informasi-publik/renstra/renstra-sekretariat-kpai-2015-2019
Indonesian Child Protection Commission. (2023). Rencana Strategis KPAI Tahun 2020-2024. https://www.kpai.go.id/utama/rencana-strategis-sekretariat-kpai-tahun-2020-2024
Indonesian Child Protection Commission. (2025). Trend of child protection cases in Indonesia 2016–2024. Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia. https://www.kpai.go.id/
Kjaer, A. M. (2023). Governance. John Wiley & Sons.
Lalayants, M., & Merkel‐Holguin, L. (2023). Adapting private family time in child protective services decision‐making processes. Child & Family Social Work, 28(3), 723–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12999
Laurensiusarliman. (2018). Peran pemerintah daerah di dalam melindungi hak anak di Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.1.2018.10-21
Lizano, E. L., He, A. S., & Leake, R. (2021). Caring for our child welfare workforce: A holistic framework of worker well-being. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 45(4), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2021.1932658
Mansir, F. (2022). Tantangan dan ancaman anak Indonesia: Potret pendidikan nasional era digital. Paudia, 11(1), 387-399. https://doi.org/10.26877/paudia.v11i1.9990
Masten, A. S. (2021). Resilience of children in disasters: A multisystem perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 56(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12737
Prastini, E. (2024). Kekerasan terhadap anak dan upaya perlindungan anak di Indonesia. Jurnal Citizenship Virtues, 4(2), 760–770. https://doi.org/10.37640/jcv.v4i2.2043
Pratiwi, A., Sutarsih, P., & Indrakentjana, B. (2023). Implementasi kebijakan kabupaten layak anak bidang kesejahteraan sosial di Kabupaten Karawang. Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial. Pekerjaan Sosial, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.31595/peksos.v22i2.1070
Rizky, R. N. (2018). Lembaga swadaya masyarakat, media massa dan hak anak. JURNAL SIMBOLIKA: Research and Learning in Communication Study, 3(2), 87. https://doi.org/10.31289/simbollika.v3i2.1454
Sacher, S. (2022). Risking children: The implications of predictive risk analytics across child protection and policing for vulnerable and marginalized children. Human Rights Law Review, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngab028
Sahputri, M., & As'ari, H. (2021). Implementasi kebijakan penyelenggaraan perlindungan anak di Kabupaten Rokan Hulu. PUBLIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 7(2), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.25299/jiap.2021.vol7(2).7440
Sarmadi, A. S. (2024). Perlindungan Anak dalam Konteks Pencabulan: Kajian Hukum dan Peran Lembaga Penegak Hukum di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak. Indonesian Research Journal on Education, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v4i3.592
Schoch, A., & Aeby, G. (2022). Ambivalence in child protection proceedings: Parents’ views on their interactions with child protection authorities. Social Sciences, 11(8), 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11080329
Sidauruk, A. D. B. (2023). Kedudukan komisi perlindungan anak Indonesia sebagai lembaga negara independen dalam perlindungan hak-hak anak di Indonesia: Analisa perbandingan lembaga negara anak di Tiongkok dan Britania Raya. Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues, 2(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.32734/nlr.v2i1.11386
Siregar, R. R., & Wahyudi, S. T. (2021). Problematika perlindungan hukum terhadap anak korban eksploitasi seksual. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8(3), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v8i3.2021.77-88
Toros, K., Tart, K., & Falch-Eriksen, A. (2021). Collaboration of child protective services and early childhood educators: Enhancing the well-being of children in need. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(5), 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01149-y
Tuakli-Wosornu, Y. A., Kirby, S. L., Tivas, A., & Rhind, D. (2023). The journey to reporting child protection violations in sport: Stakeholder perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.907247
UNICEF. (2019). Four principles of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/four-principles
Wessells, M. G., & Kostelny, K. (2021). Understanding and ending violence against children: A holistic approach. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 27(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000475
Wroe, L. E. (2021). Young people and “county lines”: a contextual and social account. Journal of Children’s Services, 16(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-10-2020-0063
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nicolaus Petrus Likuwatan Werang, Maria Lusiana Florentin Werang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
