Economic implications of implementing the bureaucratic reform roadmap in the regional medium-term development plan: A strategic effort to enhance public service quality

Rahadian Auliansyah

Authors

Rahadian Auliansyah Public Administration, University of August 17, 1945 Semarang, Semarang City, Central Java, 50133, Indonesia

Keywords:

bureaucratic reform, RPJMPD, roadmap

Abstract

Background: The implementation of the bureaucratic reform roadmap in the Semarang City Medium-Term Development Plan is a strategic effort to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of public services and achieve sustainable development goals. Method: The implementation and understanding of the bureaucratic roadmap can be carried out through the use of qualitative methods. This selection method is in line with the need for descriptive analysis in the entire Semarang City government. Descriptive understanding is needed to examine the overall scope of the strategy. Findings: The bureaucratic reform roadmap includes a number of strategies, including the development of human resource bureaucracy, strengthening governance, improving the quality of public services, and implementing information technology. To face global and local challenges, the Semarang City Government prioritizes transparency, accountability, community participation, and innovation in every step of implementation. Strengthening governance is also an important step in implementing the roadmap. Conclusion: Although there are still several challenges to be faced, such as limited budget allocation and obstacles from several parties to change, the bureaucratic reform roadmap in the Semarang City RPJMD shows the government's seriousness in improving the quality of public services and achieving sustainable development in the future. Novelty/Originality of the Study: This study provides a novel assessment of the implementation of the bureaucratic reform roadmap, emphasizing strategies for human resource development, improving governance, and enhancing public services. The study highlights the role of transparency, accountability, and innovation in addressing challenges in bureaucratic transformation.

References

Andriani, A. D., Mulyana, A., Widarnandana, I. G. D., Armunanto, A., Sumiati, I., Susanti, L., & Dewi, I. C. (2020). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. TOHAR MEDIA.

Harimurti, R. A. (2010). Dinamika Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi Pemerintahan Dan Model Connected Government Sebagai Solusi. Masyarakat Telematika Dan Informasi.

Ilyas. (2020). Revitalisasi Peran Srategis Sekretaris Daerah Dalam Mengakselerasi Reformasi Birokrasi. Kalabbirang Law Journal, 2(2), 162-181. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.kalabbirang146

Katharina, D. R. (2021). Reformasi Birokrasi-Indonesia Dan Revolusi Industri 4.0. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

PERDA Semarang. (2021). Peraturan Daerah (PERDA) Kota Semarang Nomor 6 Tahun 2021 Tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Tahun 2021-2026. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/228796/perda-kota-semarang-no-6-tahun-2021

PERWALI Semarang. (2020). Peraturan Walikota (PERWALI) Kota Semarang Nomor 66 Tahun 2020 Tentang Road Map Reformasi Birokrasi Pemerintah Kota Semarang Tahun 2020-2024. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/161331/perwali-kota-semarang-no-66-tahun-2020

Prihanto, T. (2012). Kajian Perubahan Spasial Kawasan Pinggiran Kota Semarang Ditinjau Dari Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD) Tahun 2010–2015. Sainteknol: Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/sainteknol.v10i2.5555

Radiansyah, R. R. (2020). Reformasi Birokrasi Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Kerangka Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik (Jisop), 2(1), 80-93. https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v2i1.6387

Rahman, K. (2016). Pemberdayaan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Desa. WEDANA: Jurnal Kajian Pemerintahan, Politik Dan Birokrasi, 2(2), 189-199. https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/wedana/article/view/1788

Rohayatin, T. (2017). Strategi Reformasi Birokrasi Pemerintahan Daerah: Menuju Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Transformative, 3(1), 40-52.Itle. https://transformative.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtr/article/view/22#additionalNotes

Said, A. L. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility Dalam Perspektif Governance. Deepublish.

Saputra, T., Eka, E., & Sufi, W. (2021). Preparation Of The 2020-2024 Riau Provincial Government Bureaucratic Reform Planning. Warta Pengabdian, 15(2), 82-97. https://doi.org/10.19184/wrtp.v15i2. 21979

Setyasih, E. T. (2023). Reformasi Birokrasi Dan Tantangan Implementasi Good Governance Di Indonesia. Jurnal Kelola: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 6(1), 48-62. https://doi.org/10.54783/jk.v6i1.671

Suparman, N. (2021). Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara. Indonesian Treasury Review. Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(1), 31-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.33105/itrev.v6i1.261

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The Challenge Of Reforming Big Bureaucracy In Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301

Yusriadi. (2018). Reformasi Birokrasi Indonesia: Peluang Dan Hambatan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), 8(2), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.31289/jap.v8i2.1824