Policy analysis of regional tax surtaxes and their impact on fiscal autonomy and public service quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jekop.v2i2.2025.2516Keywords:
fiscal decentralization, regional tax policy, public service deliveryAbstract
Background: This study examines the effectiveness of the Motor Vehicle Tax/Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor (PKB) surcharge (opsen) as a fiscal instrument to enhance regional financial independence and improve public service delivery in West Java Province. Introduced as part of Indonesia’s fiscal decentralization framework, the opsen aims to optimize local revenue generation while strengthening provincial autonomy in managing essential public services such as education, transportation, and environmental management. Methods: Using a qualitative descriptive approach supported by secondary data from provincial budget reports, tax realization statistics, and regulatory documents, this paper analyzes the structure of PKB and BBNKB revenues, the contribution of the opsen to Regional Own-Source Revenue/Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD), and its alignment with regional expenditure priorities. Findings: The study finds that West Java has successfully utilized the opsen to expand its fiscal capacity, evidenced by consistent growth in PAD and an improved fiscal independence ratio. Nevertheless, challenges remain, including disparities in taxpayer compliance, uneven regional revenue performance, and the need for stronger integration between tax policy and service delivery outcomes. The analysis suggests that the opsen can serve as an effective public finance strategy when supported by transparent revenue management, strengthened digital tax administration, and targeted spending on high-impact public sectors. Conclusion: The study concludes that optimizing the opsen mechanism is crucial for reinforcing fiscal resilience, promoting accountable governance, and ensuring that additional tax revenue translates into measurable improvements in public services. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study contributes to the fiscal decentralization literature by extending the analysis of subnational taxation beyond revenue generation to include administrative capacity and governance effectiveness. It develops an integrated framework linking fiscal capacity and institutional factors in evaluating the opsen tax, while also providing practical insights for optimizing regional tax policy in Indonesia.
References
Akitoby, M. B., Honda, M. J., Miyamoto, H., Primus, K., & Sy, M. (2019). Case studies in tax revenue mobilization in low-income countries. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498314565.001
Andrews, R., & Boyne, G. A. (2014). Task complexity, organizational structure, and public service performance. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12152
Asatryan, Z., Baskaran, T., & Grigoriadis, T. (2017). Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth: Theory and evidence from Germany. CESifo Economic Studies, 63(3), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifx015
Bahl, R., & Bird, R. M. (2018). Fiscal decentralization and local finance in developing countries. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Badan Pendapatan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Barat. (2025). Opsen pajak mulai berlaku, Pemprov Jabar pastikan tidak ada kenaikan PKB dan BBNKB. https://bapenda.jabarprov.go.id/2025/01/07/opsen-pajak-mulai-berlaku-pemprov-jabar-pastikan-tidak-ada-kenaikan-pkb-dan-bbnkb/
Baskaran, T., Feld, L. P., & Schnellenbach, J. (2017). Fiscal federalism, decentralization, and economic growth: A meta-analysis. Economic Inquiry, 55(3), 1445–1461. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12419
Bird, R., & Zolt, E. (2015). Fiscal contracting in developing countries. World Development, 72, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.02.002
Blöchliger, H., & King, D. (2015). Fiscal autonomy of sub-central governments and fiscal discipline: New empirical evidence (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1202). OECD. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2006/09/fiscal-autonomy-of-sub-central-governments_g17a2162/5k97b127pc0t-en.pdf
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Barat. (2022). Statistik daerah Provinsi Jawa Barat 2022. https://jabar.bps.go.id/id/publication/2022/09/26/cd2ea219e964383754090754/statistik-daerah-provinsi-jawa-barat-2022.html
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Barat. (2024). Statistik daerah Provinsi Jawa Barat 2024. https://jabar.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/09/26/00c711fd0b1ccdb85d746607/statistik-daerah-provinsi-jawa-barat-2024.html
Cagé, J., & Gadenne, L. (2022). Tax revenues and public service provision in developing countries. Economic Journal, 132(643), 417–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueab039
Cantos, P., Pastor, J., & Serrano, L. (2019). Motor vehicle taxation and its impact on transport emissions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 121, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.01.003
Castro, L., & Scartascini, C. (2021). Tax compliance in developing countries: Research and policy implications. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(4), 1250–1281. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12411
Chandra, S., & Parsad, R. (2021). Urban fiscal pressures and the financing of metropolitan transport systems. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 148, 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.010
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
D'Arcangelo, F., D'Agosto, E., & Gianfreda, A. (2022). Benefit taxation and public acceptance of vehicle-related taxes. Transport Policy, 115, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12.018
Diamond, L. (2002). Fiscal accountability and democratic governance. World Bank. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2014/09/accountability-and-democratic-governance_g1g220a4/9789264183636-en.pdf
Faguet, J. P., & Pöschl, C. (2015). Is decentralization good for development? Perspectives from academics and policy makers. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198737506.001.0001
Fenochietto, R., & Pessino, C. (2013). Understanding countries' tax effort (IMF Working Paper WP/13/244). International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/wp13244.pdf
Fjeldstad, O.-H., & Moore, M. (2019). Tax reform for low-income countries: Recommendations and lessons. Development Policy Review, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12462
Gelb, A., & Metz, A. D. (2020). Identification revolution: Can digital ID be harnessed for development? Center for Global Development. https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/identification-revolution-can-digital-id-be-harnessed-development-brief.pdf
Gupta, A., Keen, M., & Shah, A. (2021). Digitalization and tax capacity in developing economies. Journal of Public Economics, 196, 104357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104357
Hesami, K., Jenkins, G. P., & Jenkins, K. J. (2024). Digital transformation of tax administration and compliance: A systematic literature review on e-invoicing and prefilled returns. Journal of Digital Economy & Policy, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3643687
Hyman, D. N. (2020). Public finance: A contemporary application of theory to policy. Routledge.
Kamil, A. S., Setyaningrum, L., Lesmana, A. C., Putri, M. S., Negara, S., Susiati, H., & Anggoro, Y. D. (2023). Regional impact analysis of carbon tax implementation on Indonesia's coal power plant with interregional input-output method. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(3), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.14115
Kim, Y., & Lee, J. (2020). Intergovernmental fiscal coordination and administrative capacity in multi-level governance. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13262
Lewis-Faupel, S., Neggers, Y., Olken, B. A., & Pande, R. (2016). Can electronic procurement improve infrastructure provision? Evidence from field experiments in India. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(3), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140258
Liu, Z., Wang, S., Xu, H., & Qin, Y. (2020). Sustainable transport policies and their socio-economic impacts: A global evidence review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 137, 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.04.004
Mardiasmo, (2019). Perpajakan Edisi 2019 . Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Martinez-Vazquez, J., Lago-Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1095–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12182
Mas'ud, A., & Umar, M. A. (2019). Structural effects of trust in e-filing software on e-filing acceptance in services sector. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 15(2), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEIS.2019040105
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
OECD. (2019). Government at a glance 2019. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8ccf5c38-en
Peña, A., Bustos, R., & Schneider, A. (2023). Digital government and tax compliance: Evidence from emerging economies. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101761
Priyono, A. P., & Sinaga, H. D. (2022). Is administrative justice a problem-solving of tax dispute?. Journal of Tax Law and Policy, 1(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.56282/jtlp.v1i1.63
Rasul, I., & Rogger, D. (2018). Management of bureaucrats and public service delivery: Evidence from the Nigerian civil service. Journal of Public Economics, 155, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.09.004
Sá, C., Fernandes, T., & Teixeira, A. (2022). Public perceptions of taxation and compliance: A systematic review. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 99, 101873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2022.101873
Sánchez, A. (2021). Tax morale and compliance in developing economies. Journal of Public Economics, 193, 104312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104312
Shah, A. (2014). Fiscal decentralization and public services (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6962). World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/22579a03-eef7-5a03-a575-81ca531f94f7/content
Smoke, P. (2015). Rethinking decentralization: Assessing challenges to a popular public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1703
Sow, M., & Razafimahefa, I. F. (2017). Fiscal decentralization and the efficiency of public service delivery (IMF Working Paper WP/17/54). International Monetary Fund. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/238/Governing-England-devolution-funding.pdf
van Zyl, A., Ramkumar, V., & de Renzio, P. (2019). The role of social accountability in fiscal transparency: Evidence from global cases. Public Budgeting & Finance, 39(2), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12227
World Bank. (2020). Public expenditure review: Improving efficiency and fiscal sustainability. World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aditiya Rizqi Febriansah, Mohamad Rafli Dzakwan, Muhammad Solehudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
