When emotions drive the market: Behavioral and economic determinants of panic selling among poultry farmers

Authors

  • Harum Sahara Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, East Java 65144, Indonesia
  • Adi Sutanto Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, East Java 65144, Indonesia
  • Akhis Sholeh Ismail Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, East Java 65144, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61511/jane.v3i2.2026.2867

Keywords:

behavioral economics, broiler farmers, entrepreneurial decision-making, psychological buffer, sustainability outcomes

Abstract

Background: Market volatility and emotional stress strongly influence agricultural decisions. Among Indonesia’s small-scale broiler farmers, these pressures often trigger panic selling, an impulsive behavior that disrupts price stability and sustainability. Empirical studies on panic selling from a behavioral economics perspective remain limited. This study examines behavioral and economic determinants of panic selling and the mediating role of emotional stress linking production factors, market pressures, and sustainability orientation.  Methods: Data were collected from 100 broiler farmers in East Java via structured questionnaires. A PLS-SEM model with 5 constructs: internal production factors, external market pressures, emotional stress, panic selling, and sustainability orientation. The model was analyzed using reliability, validity, and bootstrapped path tests. Findings: Internal production quality (feed efficiency, chick quality, flock health, management) reduces emotional stress (β = –0.324, p < 0.001) and panic selling (β = –0.285, p < 0.001), while external market pressures (feed cost, trader dependence, market volatility, information access) increase stress (β = 0.222, p < 0.01) and panic selling (β = 0.192, p < 0.01). Emotional stress strongly mediates panic selling (β = 0.417, p < 0.001). Panic selling negatively affects sustainability orientation (β = –0.443, p < 0.001), whereas internal factors enhance it (β = 0.390, p < 0.001). The indirect effect of internal factors via stress is also significant (β = –0.135, p < 0.05). Conclusion: panic selling results from the interaction of stress and market instability, leading to short-term decisions that undermine long-term sustainability. Strengthening technical capacity, market transparency, and access to reliable information can mitigate stress, prevent panic selling, and support sustainable poultry farming. Novelty/Originality of this article: This study offers one of the first empirical insights into poultry panic selling through a behavioral economics lens, linking emotional decisions with sustainability outcomes.

 

References

Ashtiani, A. Z., Rieger, M. O., & Stutz, D. (2021). Nudging against panic selling: Making use of the IKEA effect. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100502

Bhanot, D., Kathuria, V., & Das, D. (2021). Can institutional innovations in agri-marketing channels alleviate distress selling? Evidence from India. World Development, 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105202

Boyd, N. E., Harris, J. H., & Li, B. (2018). An update on speculation and financialization in commodity markets. In Journal of Commodity Markets, 10, 91–104. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2018.05.005

Eberhardt, B. J., & Pooyan, A. (1990). Development of the farm stress survey: Factorial structure, reliability, and validity. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 11(4), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164490502018

Ezekiel, A. M., Adebayo, O. A., & Ojo, O. O. (2024). Effect of educational level on the technical efficiency of poultry farmers in Oyo State, Nigeria. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), 2296–2305. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0229

Febrianto, N., Akhiroh, P., Helmi, M., Rahmi, N. S., Masyithoh, D., & Hartono, B. (2024). Smallholder technical efficiency and farmers’ satisfaction on broiler contract farming in East Java, Indonesia. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(2), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujar.2024.120218

Gabriel, A., & Gandorfer, M. (2023). Adoption of digital technologies in agriculture—an inventory in a european small-scale farming region. Precision Agriculture, 24(1), 68–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09931-1

Han, S., & Cheng, Y. (2023). The impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on agricultural production strategy from the perspective of loss aversion. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1287814

Haruna, A. W., Salam, M., Sulaiman, A. A., Rahmadanih, R., Jamil, M. H., Pakiding, W., Tenriawaru, A. N., Akhsan, A., Mahyuddin, M., Busthanul, N., Fudjaja, L., Heliawaty, H., Muslim, A. I., Ali, H. N. B., & Ridwan, M. (2025). Examining the effect of farmer’s characteristics and production costs on the income of the layer chicken farm: on the lookout for an applicable management plan for boosting the breeder’s income. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1555709

Hatab, A. A., Liu, Z., Nasser, A., & Esmat, A. (2021). Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 impacts on small‐scale commercial broiler production systems in Egypt: Implications for mitigation strategies. Animals, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051354

He, R., Dai, Y., & Sun, G. (2023). How risk perception and loss aversion affect farmers’ willingness to withdraw from rural homesteads: Mediating role of policy identity. Heliyon, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20918

Javadi, A., Ghahremanzadeh, M., & Soumeh, E. A. (2024). Investigating the price volatility spillover effects in the poultry industry inputs market and the egg market in Iran: Using the multivariate DCC-GARCH model. Agriculture and Food Security, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-024-00472-6

Jie, Y., Wen, C., Huang, Q., Gu, S., Sun, C., Li, G., Yan, Y., Wu, G., & Yang, N. (2024). Distinct patterns of feed intake and their association with growth performance in broilers. Poultry Science, 103(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.103974

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Journal of the Ecometric Society, 47(2), 263–292. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1914185

Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131

Musyoka, J. K., Nyarindo, W. N., Alders, R., & Isaboke, H. N. (2025). Gender roles and constraints in enhancing hybrid chicken production for food security in lower Eastern Kenya. PLoS ONE, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318594

Mwakifwamba, G., Chisanza, J., & Ngalesoni, O. (2024). Use of mobile phones for market accessibility and price transparency among smallholder farmers in Tanzania: A case of Mbarali District. Journal of Policy and Development Studies, 17(1), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.4314/jpds.v17i1.20

Neza, K., Nyarko, Y., & Orozco, A. (2023). Introduction to development engineering. In T. Madon, A. J. Gadgil, R. Anderson, L. Casaburi, K. Lee, & A. Rezae (Eds.), Introduction to Development Engineering. Springer.

Nurwandi, A., & Yuslem, N. (2018). The position and role of women as heads of household according to Islamic law (study on the women's empowerment group in Asahan Regency) [in Indonesian]. Journal of Islamic Law, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.7006/attafahum.v2i1.5107

Oke, O. E., Akosile, O. A., Uyanga, V. A., Oke, F. O., Oni, A. I., Tona, K., & Onagbesan, O. M. (2024). Climate change and broiler production. In Veterinary Medicine and Science, 10(3). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1416

Paltasingh, K. R., & Goyari, P. (2018). Impact of farmer education on farm productivity under varying technologies: case of paddy growers in India. Agricultural and Food Economics, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-018-0101-9

Pramuwidyatama, M. G., Indrawan, D., Saatkamp, H. W., & Hogeveen, H. (2022). Smallholder broiler farmers’ characteristics to uptake measures against highly pathogenic avian influenza in Western Java. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.727006

Rudolphi, J. M., Cuthbertson, C., Kaur, A., & Sarol, J. (2024). A comparison between farm-related stress, mental health, and social support between men and women farmers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21060684

Saptana, N., & Ilham, N. (2020). Integrated development of chicken meat supply chains in West Java and East Java [in Indonesian]. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 18(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v18n1.2020.41-57

Suganda, A., Mujahidin Fahmid, I., Baba, S., & Salman, D. (2024). Fluctuations and disparity in broiler and carcass price before during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Heliyon, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29073

Sutanto, A., Sahara, H., Prihartini, I., Widodo, W., Rahayu, I. D., & Sutawi. (2024). Causes of panic selling in broiler farms in Malang Raya. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1341(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1341/1/012111

Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future. In American Economic Review, 106(7), 1577–1600. American Economic Association. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.106.7.1577

Vogl, S., Schmidt, E. M., & Zartler, U. (2019). Triangulating perspectives: ontology and epistemology in the analysis of qualitative multiple perspective interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(6), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1630901

Von Braun, J. (2012). Global food price volatility and spikes: An overview of costs, causes, and solutions. ZEF Discussion Paper No. 165, Center for Development Research, University of Bonn.

Widiarta, I. P. G., Aldyanti, A., Anindyasari, D., & Rizkuna, A. (2024). The impact of feed price dynamics on broiler farm productivity and farmer welfare: A case study in Kutai Kartanegara Regency. Economic and Business Management International Journal, 6(3), 2715–3681. https://doi.org/10.556442

Wuepper, D., Bukchin-Peles, S., Just, D., & Zilberman, D. (2023). Behavioral agricultural economics. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 45(4), 2094–2105. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13343

Younker, T., & Radunovich, H. L. (2022). Farmer mental health interventions: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010244

Zaman, Moh. H., Wahyuningsih, D., & Nugroho, R. Y. Y. (2024). The response of farmer welfares amidst food prices shock and inflation in the province of East Java. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 3(12). https://doi.org/10.56472/25835238/irjems-v3i12p129

Downloads

Published

2026-08-19

How to Cite

Sahara, H., Sutanto, A., & Ismail, A. S. (2026). When emotions drive the market: Behavioral and economic determinants of panic selling among poultry farmers. Journal of Entrepreneurial Economics, 3(2), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.61511/jane.v3i2.2026.2867

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check