Integrating MSMEs’ business agility into SDGs framework: A pathway toward sustainable environmental economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61511/jane.v3i1.2026.2866Keywords:
business agility, MSMEs, green economy, sustainable development, eco-innovation, dynamic capabilitiesAbstract
Background: Micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) are pivotal to Indonesia’s economy, contributing 61% to GDP and 97% to employment, yet face significant barriers in adopting sustainable practices amid environmental challenges like 216 million tons of annual CO₂ emissions. This study aims to analyze how business agility enables MSMEs to transition toward a green economy, aligning with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 8, 9, and 13. Existing literature highlights agility’s role in SME innovation but lacks a multidimensional framework for MSMEs in developing economies, particularly Indonesia, where low green adoption (<5% ISO 14001 certification) and financing gaps (IDR 2,400 trillion shortfall by 2026) persist. Methods: An integrative literature review (ILR) was conducted, synthesizing secondary qualitative data from sources like Bappenas report, peer-reviewed studies, and reports from OECD, World Bank, and UNDP. Using Whittemore and Knafl’s framework, the study employed thematic analysis within a dynamic capabilities theory lens, categorizing findings into firm-level (e.g., eco-innovation), network-level (e.g., collaborative ecosystems), and institutional-level (e.g., policy adaptability) dimensions. Findings: Results reveal that firm-level agility drives eco-innovation but is limited by low digital transformation (16% adoption). Network-level agility, through partnerships like West Java’s 38 cleantech startups, supports SDG 9, while institutional-level agility addresses financing gaps, aligning with SDG 13. Regional disparities, such as South Sulawesi’s 74% lack of green processes, highlight the need for tailored agility strategies. Triangulated data confirm agility’s role in bridging micro-level practices with macro-level SDG goals, extending dynamic capabilities theory. Conclusion: Business agility empowers MSMEs to navigate environmental and market challenges, fostering sustainable transitions critical for Indonesia’s net-zero goal by 2060. Novelty/Originality: This study offers a novel multidimensional framework linking agility across firm, network, and institutional levels to SDGs, addressing underexplored Indonesia-specific challenges and proposing actionable policy interventions for green MSME empowerment.
References
Ali, P. R., Machfud, M., Sukardi, S., Noor, E., & Purnomo, D. (2023). Indonesian agroindustry business agility: Enablers and challenges in the poultry industry based on ISM model. Heliyon, 9, e16808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16808
Al-Shaer, H., Liu, Y. S., & Albitar, K. (2023). Driving businesses towards a better climate: Macro and micro mechanisms to protect the planet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 1810–1833. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3575
Arno, P. (2025). SME business agility framework: A comprehensive review of capabilities, dimensions, and enablers. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3572526
Bappenas. (2024). Peta jalan & rencana aksi nasional ekonomi sirkular Indonesia 2025–2045. Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (Bappenas).
Bappenas. (2025a). Rencana pembangunan jangka menengah nasional (RPJMN) 2025–2029: Perekonomian hijau dan inklusif. Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (Bappenas).
Bappenas. (2025b). White paper: Unveiling the future of sustainable business through empowering green MSMEs. Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (Bappenas).
Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65(2), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
Chung, T. T. R., Liang, T. P., Peng, C. H., & Chen, D. N. (2019). Knowledge creation and organizational performance: Moderating and mediating processes from an organizational agility perspective. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 11(2), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00114
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Doz, Y. L. (2020). Fostering strategic agility: How individual executives and human resource practices contribute. Human Resource Management Review, 30(1), 100693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100693
Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43, 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.006
Hamieddine, C., & Akioud, M. (2025). Agility for resilience: A qualitative exploration of companies’ strategies in a volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous environment. Corporate & Business Strategy Review, 6(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i2art11
Institute for Development of Economics and Finance (INDEF). (2024). Peran platform digital terhadap pengembangan UMKM di Indonesia. Institute for Development of Economics and Finance.
Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia (Kemenko Perekonomian). (2025). Pemerintah dorong UMKM naik kelas, tingkatkan kontribusi terhadap ekspor Indonesia [Press release]. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia.
Kwasek, A., Kocot, M., Rodowicki, S., Kandefer, K., Szymanska, M., Sobon, D., & Trzaskowska-Dmoch, A. (2025). The impact of organizational agility on the sustainable development of the organization in the context of Economy 5.0. Sustainability, 17(15), 6907. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156907
Liu, H. M., & Yang, H. F. (2019). Network resource meets organizational agility: Creating an idiosyncratic competitive advantage for SMEs. Management Decision, 58(10), 2153–2171. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2017-1061
New Energy Nexus Indonesia. (2024). Policy guideline: Ekosistem startup cleantech di tingkat nasional dan subnasional. New Energy Nexus Indonesia. (2024).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). OECD green growth policy review of Indonesia 2019. OECD Environmental Performance Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1787/1eee39bc-en
Oermann, M. H., & Knafl, K. A. (2021). Strategies for completing a successful integrative review. Nurse Author & Editor, 31(3–4), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/nae2.30
Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000600
Rawashdeh, A., Abdallah, A. B., Alfawaeer, M., Al Dweiri, M., & Al-Jaghbeer, F. (2024). The impact of strategic agility on environmental sustainability: The mediating role of digital transformation. Sustainability, 16(3), 1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031338
Rigby, D. K., Sutherland, J., & Noble, A. (2018). Agile at scale. Harvard Business Review, 96(3), 88–96. https://hbr.org/2018/05/agile-at-scale
Sivaiah, P., & Vinodan, A. (2025). Framework for sustainable SME management: Integrating innovation, technology, and circular economy approach. Small Enterprise Research, 32(1), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2025.2513262
Spence, M., Gherib, J. B. B., & Biwole, V. M. O. (2008). A framework of SMEs’ strategic involvement in sustainable development. In Sustainable innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 49–70). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848441552.00010
Tallon, P. P., Queiroz, M., Coltman, T., & Sharma, R. (2019). Information technology and the search for organizational agility: A systematic review with future research possibilities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.12.002
Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). (2020). Micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) and their role in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2025). Annual report 2024. UNDP Indonesia.
United Nations (UN). (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals report 2021. United Nations
World Bank. (2023). Indonesia economic prospects. World Bank Group.
Yusuf, M., Surya, B., Menne, F., Ruslan, M., Suriani, S., & Iskandar, I. (2023). Business agility and competitive advantage of SMEs in Makassar City, Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(1), 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010627
Zahoor, N., Golgeci, I., Haapanen, L., Ali, I., & Arslan, A. (2022). The role of dynamic capabilities and strategic agility of B2B high-tech small and medium-sized enterprises during COVID-19 pandemic: Exploratory case studies from Finland. Industrial Marketing Management, 105, 502–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.07.006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ramli Yana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
